最佳聚类数算法的从业者指南

M. Andrews
{"title":"最佳聚类数算法的从业者指南","authors":"M. Andrews","doi":"10.3905/jfds.2023.1.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying profitable investment strategies has been a long-standing challenge for finance practitioners. The optimal number of clusters (ONC) algorithm is a reliable tool used to evaluate backtest results affected by multiple testing. The algorithm is necessary to calculate the deflated Sharpe ratio, a popular metric that detects potential false positive investment strategies. These methods are based on the familywise error rate approach, which provides stringent control over the overall error rate, reducing the likelihood of false discoveries and increasing the reliability of findings. The ONC algorithm’s time complexity, however, poses a significant challenge for practitioners. This study proposes a practical solution to reduce the number of clusters tested by the ONC algorithm while maintaining accuracy. Results from simulated datasets demonstrate that the proposed solution significantly reduces the algorithm’s runtime. Additionally, this study addresses the impact of outliers on the ONC algorithm, showing that they can lead to nonoptimal solutions, and provides a simple solution to mitigate their effects. These findings contribute to the literature on finance by enhancing the usability of the ONC algorithm.","PeriodicalId":199045,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Practitioner’s Guide to the Optimal Number of Clusters Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"M. Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jfds.2023.1.133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identifying profitable investment strategies has been a long-standing challenge for finance practitioners. The optimal number of clusters (ONC) algorithm is a reliable tool used to evaluate backtest results affected by multiple testing. The algorithm is necessary to calculate the deflated Sharpe ratio, a popular metric that detects potential false positive investment strategies. These methods are based on the familywise error rate approach, which provides stringent control over the overall error rate, reducing the likelihood of false discoveries and increasing the reliability of findings. The ONC algorithm’s time complexity, however, poses a significant challenge for practitioners. This study proposes a practical solution to reduce the number of clusters tested by the ONC algorithm while maintaining accuracy. Results from simulated datasets demonstrate that the proposed solution significantly reduces the algorithm’s runtime. Additionally, this study addresses the impact of outliers on the ONC algorithm, showing that they can lead to nonoptimal solutions, and provides a simple solution to mitigate their effects. These findings contribute to the literature on finance by enhancing the usability of the ONC algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2023.1.133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2023.1.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定有利可图的投资策略一直是金融从业者面临的一个长期挑战。最优聚类数(ONC)算法是评估多重测试影响下回测结果的可靠工具。该算法对于计算缩水夏普比率(deflated Sharpe ratio)是必要的,后者是一种检测潜在误报投资策略的流行指标。这些方法基于家庭错误率方法,该方法严格控制了总体错误率,减少了错误发现的可能性,提高了结果的可靠性。然而,ONC算法的时间复杂度给实践者带来了巨大的挑战。本研究提出了一种实用的解决方案,以减少ONC算法测试的聚类数量,同时保持准确性。模拟数据集的结果表明,该方法显著降低了算法的运行时间。此外,本研究解决了异常值对ONC算法的影响,表明它们可能导致非最优解,并提供了一个简单的解决方案来减轻其影响。这些发现通过提高ONC算法的可用性,为金融文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Practitioner’s Guide to the Optimal Number of Clusters Algorithm
Identifying profitable investment strategies has been a long-standing challenge for finance practitioners. The optimal number of clusters (ONC) algorithm is a reliable tool used to evaluate backtest results affected by multiple testing. The algorithm is necessary to calculate the deflated Sharpe ratio, a popular metric that detects potential false positive investment strategies. These methods are based on the familywise error rate approach, which provides stringent control over the overall error rate, reducing the likelihood of false discoveries and increasing the reliability of findings. The ONC algorithm’s time complexity, however, poses a significant challenge for practitioners. This study proposes a practical solution to reduce the number of clusters tested by the ONC algorithm while maintaining accuracy. Results from simulated datasets demonstrate that the proposed solution significantly reduces the algorithm’s runtime. Additionally, this study addresses the impact of outliers on the ONC algorithm, showing that they can lead to nonoptimal solutions, and provides a simple solution to mitigate their effects. These findings contribute to the literature on finance by enhancing the usability of the ONC algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信