飞机电力系统故障安全架构设计

J. Menu, M. Nicolai, M. Zeller
{"title":"飞机电力系统故障安全架构设计","authors":"J. Menu, M. Nicolai, M. Zeller","doi":"10.2514/6.2018-5032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More-electric, hybrid-electric, and all-electric aircraft have one important thing in common: they increasingly rely on electrical components and electrical power systems for fulfilling their principal functions. The increased dependency on electrical power has a drastic impact on the nature of the power generation and distribution system within the aircraft. New electrical components, often safety-critical, require completely rethinking of established electrical power system architectures. Manual (re)design, verification, and test of these complex systems becomes costly, cluttered, and often even infeasible. With a new methodology and software tool, we provide the ability to combine different aspects within the early design phases of electrical power systems. Based on a declarative component-based model, a designer can use the tool to automatically generate architectural variants. The component-based models seamlessly integrate with safety and reliability models in the form of component fault trees, which combine the traditional expressiveness of fault tree analysis for failure behavior with some notable advantages. Component fault trees enable the automatic ranking of the generated architectures in terms of safety and reliability attributes. By associating performance models with the original models, the tool also enables verifying complex functional requirements for the ranked architectures, again in a largely automated fashion. We demonstrate the developed methodology on two realistic use cases. In addition, we comment on the ability to apply the same methodology for the design of other systems (e.g., hydraulics, avionics). Indeed, the redesign of the electrical power system will often go hand in hand with rethinking other aircraft systems, because of their mutual interface(s).","PeriodicalId":276296,"journal":{"name":"2018 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Fail-Safe Architectures for Aircraft Electrical Power Systems\",\"authors\":\"J. Menu, M. Nicolai, M. Zeller\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/6.2018-5032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"More-electric, hybrid-electric, and all-electric aircraft have one important thing in common: they increasingly rely on electrical components and electrical power systems for fulfilling their principal functions. The increased dependency on electrical power has a drastic impact on the nature of the power generation and distribution system within the aircraft. New electrical components, often safety-critical, require completely rethinking of established electrical power system architectures. Manual (re)design, verification, and test of these complex systems becomes costly, cluttered, and often even infeasible. With a new methodology and software tool, we provide the ability to combine different aspects within the early design phases of electrical power systems. Based on a declarative component-based model, a designer can use the tool to automatically generate architectural variants. The component-based models seamlessly integrate with safety and reliability models in the form of component fault trees, which combine the traditional expressiveness of fault tree analysis for failure behavior with some notable advantages. Component fault trees enable the automatic ranking of the generated architectures in terms of safety and reliability attributes. By associating performance models with the original models, the tool also enables verifying complex functional requirements for the ranked architectures, again in a largely automated fashion. We demonstrate the developed methodology on two realistic use cases. In addition, we comment on the ability to apply the same methodology for the design of other systems (e.g., hydraulics, avionics). Indeed, the redesign of the electrical power system will often go hand in hand with rethinking other aircraft systems, because of their mutual interface(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":276296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS)\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-5032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-5032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

电动飞机、混合动力飞机和全电动飞机有一个重要的共同点:它们越来越依赖电子元件和电力系统来实现其主要功能。对电力依赖的增加对飞机内发电和配电系统的性质产生了巨大影响。新的电气元件通常对安全至关重要,需要完全重新考虑已建立的电力系统架构。这些复杂系统的手工(重新)设计、验证和测试变得昂贵、混乱,甚至常常是不可行的。通过新的方法和软件工具,我们提供了在电力系统的早期设计阶段结合不同方面的能力。基于声明性的基于组件的模型,设计人员可以使用该工具自动生成体系结构变体。基于组件的模型以组件故障树的形式与安全、可靠性模型无缝集成,结合了传统故障树分析故障行为的表达性和一些显著的优点。组件故障树可以根据安全可靠性属性对生成的体系结构进行自动排序。通过将性能模型与原始模型相关联,该工具还能够以很大程度上自动化的方式验证排名体系结构的复杂功能需求。我们在两个实际用例上演示开发的方法。此外,我们还评论了将相同的方法应用于其他系统(例如,液压,航空电子设备)设计的能力。事实上,电力系统的重新设计通常会与重新考虑其他飞机系统同时进行,因为它们的相互接口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing Fail-Safe Architectures for Aircraft Electrical Power Systems
More-electric, hybrid-electric, and all-electric aircraft have one important thing in common: they increasingly rely on electrical components and electrical power systems for fulfilling their principal functions. The increased dependency on electrical power has a drastic impact on the nature of the power generation and distribution system within the aircraft. New electrical components, often safety-critical, require completely rethinking of established electrical power system architectures. Manual (re)design, verification, and test of these complex systems becomes costly, cluttered, and often even infeasible. With a new methodology and software tool, we provide the ability to combine different aspects within the early design phases of electrical power systems. Based on a declarative component-based model, a designer can use the tool to automatically generate architectural variants. The component-based models seamlessly integrate with safety and reliability models in the form of component fault trees, which combine the traditional expressiveness of fault tree analysis for failure behavior with some notable advantages. Component fault trees enable the automatic ranking of the generated architectures in terms of safety and reliability attributes. By associating performance models with the original models, the tool also enables verifying complex functional requirements for the ranked architectures, again in a largely automated fashion. We demonstrate the developed methodology on two realistic use cases. In addition, we comment on the ability to apply the same methodology for the design of other systems (e.g., hydraulics, avionics). Indeed, the redesign of the electrical power system will often go hand in hand with rethinking other aircraft systems, because of their mutual interface(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信