削弱课堂:作为人文学科教学方法的残疾

C. McKinney
{"title":"削弱课堂:作为人文学科教学方法的残疾","authors":"C. McKinney","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2014.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disability pedagogy is a growing and vibrant topic for educators and for scholars of disability studies. Debates range at the K-12 level from reshaping classes to include students with all types of disabilities, instead of marginalizing them in special education classes (Liasidou 171-174, Ware 108), to debates at all levels over the importance and limits of identity politics and disability embodiment (Linton 152-156). Disability in the classroom, both literally and conceptually, is transforming how we think about the normative goals of education and the requirements of an accessible classroom. These debates are important to understand, and they succeed in pushing disability pedagogy. This essay, however, considers disability as a method for approaching texts and facilitating engagement in the classroom. I will focus on methods of “cripping the classroom” in a humanities and humanistic social sciences college setting when the class is not explicitly oriented around issues of disability. Cripping the classroom entails developing a political understanding of disability as a socially constructed category that focuses attention on questions of accessibility as central normative concerns for interpersonal, intellectual, and social relations. Cripping the classroom can enrich the use of disability pedagogy to spur thinking about disability and about the world. “Disability“ here refers to the complex of embodied difference rendered pathological by discursive and material practices. “Impairment“ marks particular embodied differences, such as being hard of hearing or paralyzed or autistic, but disability refers to the social life of those embodied differences—how people and the world interpret, react to, integrate, and exclude those impairments and the people who have them. Disability as an identity becomes a pressing concern for anyone interested in creating social justice in the humanities classroom because ableism, or the norms and structures of society that work to exclude or diminish the life chances of people with disability, is written into the canons of philosophy, European and American history, political science, and literature. People with disabilities are excluded from the college classroom because of admission requirements that foreclose interacting with students with various intellectual disabilities, or campuses with buildings grandfathered in under the Americans with Disabilities Act that make dorms and classrooms only minimally accessible to people with mobility impairments. Beyond these exclusions, the formative nature of disability oppression in how we think CLAIRE McKINNEY","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cripping the Classroom: Disability as a Teaching Method in the Humanities\",\"authors\":\"C. McKinney\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/TNF.2014.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disability pedagogy is a growing and vibrant topic for educators and for scholars of disability studies. Debates range at the K-12 level from reshaping classes to include students with all types of disabilities, instead of marginalizing them in special education classes (Liasidou 171-174, Ware 108), to debates at all levels over the importance and limits of identity politics and disability embodiment (Linton 152-156). Disability in the classroom, both literally and conceptually, is transforming how we think about the normative goals of education and the requirements of an accessible classroom. These debates are important to understand, and they succeed in pushing disability pedagogy. This essay, however, considers disability as a method for approaching texts and facilitating engagement in the classroom. I will focus on methods of “cripping the classroom” in a humanities and humanistic social sciences college setting when the class is not explicitly oriented around issues of disability. Cripping the classroom entails developing a political understanding of disability as a socially constructed category that focuses attention on questions of accessibility as central normative concerns for interpersonal, intellectual, and social relations. Cripping the classroom can enrich the use of disability pedagogy to spur thinking about disability and about the world. “Disability“ here refers to the complex of embodied difference rendered pathological by discursive and material practices. “Impairment“ marks particular embodied differences, such as being hard of hearing or paralyzed or autistic, but disability refers to the social life of those embodied differences—how people and the world interpret, react to, integrate, and exclude those impairments and the people who have them. Disability as an identity becomes a pressing concern for anyone interested in creating social justice in the humanities classroom because ableism, or the norms and structures of society that work to exclude or diminish the life chances of people with disability, is written into the canons of philosophy, European and American history, political science, and literature. People with disabilities are excluded from the college classroom because of admission requirements that foreclose interacting with students with various intellectual disabilities, or campuses with buildings grandfathered in under the Americans with Disabilities Act that make dorms and classrooms only minimally accessible to people with mobility impairments. Beyond these exclusions, the formative nature of disability oppression in how we think CLAIRE McKINNEY\",\"PeriodicalId\":138207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2014.0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2014.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

残疾教育学对于教育工作者和残疾研究学者来说是一个不断发展和充满活力的话题。在K-12阶段,争论的范围从重塑班级,包括所有类型的残疾学生,而不是在特殊教育班级中将他们边缘化(Liasidou 171-174, Ware 108),到各级关于身份政治和残疾体现的重要性和局限性的辩论(Linton 152-156)。课堂上的残疾,无论是字面上还是概念上,都在改变我们对教育规范目标和无障碍课堂要求的看法。理解这些争论是很重要的,它们成功地推动了残疾教育。然而,这篇文章认为残疾是一种接近文本和促进课堂参与的方法。我将重点讨论在人文和人文社会科学学院的课堂设置中,当课堂没有明确地以残疾问题为导向时,“剪辑课堂”的方法。课堂教学需要发展对残疾的政治理解,将其作为一个社会建构的范畴,将注意力集中在可达性问题上,作为人际关系、智力和社会关系的核心规范性问题。课堂教学可以丰富残疾教育的运用,激发人们对残疾和世界的思考。这里的“残疾”是指被话语实践和物质实践所病态化的体现差异的复合体。“缺陷”标志着特定的具体差异,如听力障碍、瘫痪或自闭症,但残疾指的是这些具体差异的社会生活——人们和世界如何解释、反应、整合和排斥这些缺陷和患有这些缺陷的人。残疾作为一种身份,对任何有兴趣在人文学科课堂上创造社会正义的人来说,都是一个紧迫的问题,因为残疾歧视,或排斥或减少残疾人生活机会的社会规范和结构,已经被写进了哲学、欧美历史、政治学和文学的经典中。残疾人被排除在大学教室之外,因为入学要求禁止与各种智力残疾的学生互动,或者校园里的建筑根据《美国残疾人法案》(Americans with disabilities Act)的规定,对行动不便的人来说,宿舍和教室只有最低限度的出入。除了这些排斥,残疾压迫的形成本质是我们如何看待克莱尔·麦金尼
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cripping the Classroom: Disability as a Teaching Method in the Humanities
Disability pedagogy is a growing and vibrant topic for educators and for scholars of disability studies. Debates range at the K-12 level from reshaping classes to include students with all types of disabilities, instead of marginalizing them in special education classes (Liasidou 171-174, Ware 108), to debates at all levels over the importance and limits of identity politics and disability embodiment (Linton 152-156). Disability in the classroom, both literally and conceptually, is transforming how we think about the normative goals of education and the requirements of an accessible classroom. These debates are important to understand, and they succeed in pushing disability pedagogy. This essay, however, considers disability as a method for approaching texts and facilitating engagement in the classroom. I will focus on methods of “cripping the classroom” in a humanities and humanistic social sciences college setting when the class is not explicitly oriented around issues of disability. Cripping the classroom entails developing a political understanding of disability as a socially constructed category that focuses attention on questions of accessibility as central normative concerns for interpersonal, intellectual, and social relations. Cripping the classroom can enrich the use of disability pedagogy to spur thinking about disability and about the world. “Disability“ here refers to the complex of embodied difference rendered pathological by discursive and material practices. “Impairment“ marks particular embodied differences, such as being hard of hearing or paralyzed or autistic, but disability refers to the social life of those embodied differences—how people and the world interpret, react to, integrate, and exclude those impairments and the people who have them. Disability as an identity becomes a pressing concern for anyone interested in creating social justice in the humanities classroom because ableism, or the norms and structures of society that work to exclude or diminish the life chances of people with disability, is written into the canons of philosophy, European and American history, political science, and literature. People with disabilities are excluded from the college classroom because of admission requirements that foreclose interacting with students with various intellectual disabilities, or campuses with buildings grandfathered in under the Americans with Disabilities Act that make dorms and classrooms only minimally accessible to people with mobility impairments. Beyond these exclusions, the formative nature of disability oppression in how we think CLAIRE McKINNEY
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信