电子商务的网页设计与评估:一个商业主页视觉设计的案例研究

Wan-li Wei, Yuan-Hsiu Chen, Li-Chieh Chen, Po-Ying Chu
{"title":"电子商务的网页设计与评估:一个商业主页视觉设计的案例研究","authors":"Wan-li Wei, Yuan-Hsiu Chen, Li-Chieh Chen, Po-Ying Chu","doi":"10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5576161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to constitute the evaluation structure and questionnaires for website visual design, with a view to assessing four visual design alternatives published on the homepage of an online shopping. This research concludes: (1) twenty evaluation criteria in relation to website visual design determined through access the relative importance of criteria set as sub-criteria within a hierarchical structure; (2) goal, criteria, and sub-criteria constitute the evaluation model for website visual design. It provides the reference for the industry and relevant researchers when evaluating the candidates of website visual design; and (3) this study adopts fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (FMCDM) with reference to the data analysis. The results can clearly show the preference ranking of decision-makers for proposed design alternatives and the optimal design solution could be selected. Therefore, this analysis method is effective and objectively reflected all of the decision-makers' subjective judgment on website visual design assessment.","PeriodicalId":329390,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Web Design and Assessment for E-Commerce: A Case Study on the Visual Design of a Commercial Homepage\",\"authors\":\"Wan-li Wei, Yuan-Hsiu Chen, Li-Chieh Chen, Po-Ying Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5576161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study is based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to constitute the evaluation structure and questionnaires for website visual design, with a view to assessing four visual design alternatives published on the homepage of an online shopping. This research concludes: (1) twenty evaluation criteria in relation to website visual design determined through access the relative importance of criteria set as sub-criteria within a hierarchical structure; (2) goal, criteria, and sub-criteria constitute the evaluation model for website visual design. It provides the reference for the industry and relevant researchers when evaluating the candidates of website visual design; and (3) this study adopts fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (FMCDM) with reference to the data analysis. The results can clearly show the preference ranking of decision-makers for proposed design alternatives and the optimal design solution could be selected. Therefore, this analysis method is effective and objectively reflected all of the decision-makers' subjective judgment on website visual design assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5576161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5576161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以层次分析法(AHP)为基础,建构网站视觉设计的评估架构及问卷,以评估某网上购物网站首页所刊登的四种视觉设计方案。本研究的结论是:(1)20个与网站视觉设计相关的评价标准,通过访问在层次结构中作为子标准设置的标准的相对重要性来确定;(2)目标、标准和子标准构成了网站视觉设计的评价模型。为行业及相关研究人员评价网站视觉设计候选人提供参考;(3)结合数据分析,采用模糊多准则决策(FMCDM)。结果可以清楚地显示决策者对所提出的设计方案的偏好排序,从而选择出最优设计方案。因此,这种分析方法是有效的,客观地反映了所有决策者对网站视觉设计评估的主观判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Web Design and Assessment for E-Commerce: A Case Study on the Visual Design of a Commercial Homepage
The study is based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to constitute the evaluation structure and questionnaires for website visual design, with a view to assessing four visual design alternatives published on the homepage of an online shopping. This research concludes: (1) twenty evaluation criteria in relation to website visual design determined through access the relative importance of criteria set as sub-criteria within a hierarchical structure; (2) goal, criteria, and sub-criteria constitute the evaluation model for website visual design. It provides the reference for the industry and relevant researchers when evaluating the candidates of website visual design; and (3) this study adopts fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (FMCDM) with reference to the data analysis. The results can clearly show the preference ranking of decision-makers for proposed design alternatives and the optimal design solution could be selected. Therefore, this analysis method is effective and objectively reflected all of the decision-makers' subjective judgment on website visual design assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信