字体粗细和呈现系统对基于浏览的文本易读性的影响

Jonathan Dobres, B. Reimer, N. Chahine
{"title":"字体粗细和呈现系统对基于浏览的文本易读性的影响","authors":"Jonathan Dobres, B. Reimer, N. Chahine","doi":"10.1145/3003715.3005454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In-vehicle user interfaces increasingly rely on digital text to display information to the driver. Led by Apple's iOS, thin, lightweight typography has become increasingly popular in cutting-edge HMI designs. The legibility trade-offs of lightweight typography are sparsely studied, particularly in the glance-like reading scenarios necessitated by driving. Previous research has shown that even relatively subtle differences in the design of the on-screen typeface can influence to-device glance time in a measurable and meaningful way. Here we investigate the relative legibility of four different weights (line thicknesses) of type under two different rendering systems (suboptimal rendering and optimal rendering). Results indicate that under suboptimal rendering, the lightest weight typeface renders poorly and is associated with markedly degraded legibility. Under optimal rendering, lighter weight typefaces show enhanced legibility compared to heavier typefaces. The reasons for this pattern of results, and its implications for design considerations in modern HMIs, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":448266,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Font Weight and Rendering System on Glance-Based Text Legibility\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Dobres, B. Reimer, N. Chahine\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3003715.3005454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In-vehicle user interfaces increasingly rely on digital text to display information to the driver. Led by Apple's iOS, thin, lightweight typography has become increasingly popular in cutting-edge HMI designs. The legibility trade-offs of lightweight typography are sparsely studied, particularly in the glance-like reading scenarios necessitated by driving. Previous research has shown that even relatively subtle differences in the design of the on-screen typeface can influence to-device glance time in a measurable and meaningful way. Here we investigate the relative legibility of four different weights (line thicknesses) of type under two different rendering systems (suboptimal rendering and optimal rendering). Results indicate that under suboptimal rendering, the lightest weight typeface renders poorly and is associated with markedly degraded legibility. Under optimal rendering, lighter weight typefaces show enhanced legibility compared to heavier typefaces. The reasons for this pattern of results, and its implications for design considerations in modern HMIs, are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

车载用户界面越来越依赖于数字文本向驾驶员显示信息。在苹果iOS的引领下,轻薄的字体在尖端的人机界面设计中越来越受欢迎。对于轻量排版的易读性权衡的研究很少,特别是在开车时需要快速阅读的情况下。先前的研究表明,即使是屏幕字体设计上相对细微的差异,也会以一种可测量且有意义的方式影响到设备的浏览时间。在这里,我们研究了在两种不同的渲染系统(次优渲染和最佳渲染)下,四种不同的字体权重(线粗)的相对易读性。结果表明,在次优渲染下,最轻的字体呈现效果不佳,易读性明显下降。在最佳渲染下,较轻的字体比较重的字体具有更好的易读性。本文讨论了产生这种结果模式的原因,以及它对现代人机界面设计考虑的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Font Weight and Rendering System on Glance-Based Text Legibility
In-vehicle user interfaces increasingly rely on digital text to display information to the driver. Led by Apple's iOS, thin, lightweight typography has become increasingly popular in cutting-edge HMI designs. The legibility trade-offs of lightweight typography are sparsely studied, particularly in the glance-like reading scenarios necessitated by driving. Previous research has shown that even relatively subtle differences in the design of the on-screen typeface can influence to-device glance time in a measurable and meaningful way. Here we investigate the relative legibility of four different weights (line thicknesses) of type under two different rendering systems (suboptimal rendering and optimal rendering). Results indicate that under suboptimal rendering, the lightest weight typeface renders poorly and is associated with markedly degraded legibility. Under optimal rendering, lighter weight typefaces show enhanced legibility compared to heavier typefaces. The reasons for this pattern of results, and its implications for design considerations in modern HMIs, are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信