第一种设计用于减少产水的支撑剂

J. Green, Andreina Dewendt, J. Terracina, B. Abrams, Adam Harper
{"title":"第一种设计用于减少产水的支撑剂","authors":"J. Green, Andreina Dewendt, J. Terracina, B. Abrams, Adam Harper","doi":"10.2118/191394-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper discusses research on how proppant selection affects fracturing treatment results in shale formations that produce high water volumes. Fracturing treatments, formation characteristics, proppant types, and post fracture treatment production results are examined in detail. A production case study that focuses on the impact of proppant selection in wells completed in formations that produce hydrocarbons with a high water cut will also be presented.\n This paper analyzes laboratory tests that were performed to measure the water and oil flow rates of various commonly used proppants. A case study on how Decreased Water Flow Proppant (DWFP) performed in the Granite Wash in the Texas panhandle is also highlighted. Post fracture treatment production results are compared to traditional proppants used in direct offset wells.\n Laboratory testing showed DWFP had much lower water flow and higher oil flow through the proppant pack compared to traditional proppants. The results of the laboratory tests will be used to explain and support the production case study. The field case study proves that DWFP reduced formation water production, while increasing hydrocarbon production compared to traditional proppants used in offset wells. This innovative proppant appears to decrease the relative permeability to water in the proppant pack, resulting in lower water production and higher hydrocarbon production compared to conventional proppants.\n This paper introduces the first proppant specifically designed for fracturing treatments in high water cut reservoirs. A new laboratory test method of measuring water flow rate through a proppant pack was specifically developed for this type of proppant. The proppant’s wettability is introduced as a new proppant selection factor for fracturing treatments in high water cut reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":441169,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Proppant Designed to Decrease Water Production\",\"authors\":\"J. Green, Andreina Dewendt, J. Terracina, B. Abrams, Adam Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191394-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper discusses research on how proppant selection affects fracturing treatment results in shale formations that produce high water volumes. Fracturing treatments, formation characteristics, proppant types, and post fracture treatment production results are examined in detail. A production case study that focuses on the impact of proppant selection in wells completed in formations that produce hydrocarbons with a high water cut will also be presented.\\n This paper analyzes laboratory tests that were performed to measure the water and oil flow rates of various commonly used proppants. A case study on how Decreased Water Flow Proppant (DWFP) performed in the Granite Wash in the Texas panhandle is also highlighted. Post fracture treatment production results are compared to traditional proppants used in direct offset wells.\\n Laboratory testing showed DWFP had much lower water flow and higher oil flow through the proppant pack compared to traditional proppants. The results of the laboratory tests will be used to explain and support the production case study. The field case study proves that DWFP reduced formation water production, while increasing hydrocarbon production compared to traditional proppants used in offset wells. This innovative proppant appears to decrease the relative permeability to water in the proppant pack, resulting in lower water production and higher hydrocarbon production compared to conventional proppants.\\n This paper introduces the first proppant specifically designed for fracturing treatments in high water cut reservoirs. A new laboratory test method of measuring water flow rate through a proppant pack was specifically developed for this type of proppant. The proppant’s wettability is introduced as a new proppant selection factor for fracturing treatments in high water cut reservoirs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191394-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191394-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文讨论了支撑剂的选择如何影响产水量较大的页岩地层的压裂效果。详细分析了压裂措施、地层特征、支撑剂类型以及压裂后的产量结果。还将介绍一个生产案例研究,重点关注在高含水地层中完井时支撑剂选择的影响。本文分析了为测量各种常用支撑剂的水流量和油流量而进行的实验室测试。本文还重点介绍了德克萨斯州狭长地带Granite Wash的减水流量支撑剂(DWFP)应用情况。将压裂后的产量与直接邻井中使用的传统支撑剂进行了比较。实验室测试表明,与传统支撑剂相比,DWFP通过支撑剂充填层的水流量更低,油流量更高。实验室测试的结果将用于解释和支持生产案例研究。现场案例研究证明,与邻井中使用的传统支撑剂相比,DWFP降低了地层产水,同时提高了油气产量。与传统支撑剂相比,这种创新的支撑剂降低了支撑剂充填层对水的相对渗透率,从而降低了产水量,提高了油气产量。本文介绍了第一种专门用于高含水油藏压裂的支撑剂。针对这种类型的支撑剂,开发了一种新的实验室测试方法来测量通过支撑剂充填的水流量。在高含水油藏中,支撑剂的润湿性是一种新的支撑剂选择因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First Proppant Designed to Decrease Water Production
This paper discusses research on how proppant selection affects fracturing treatment results in shale formations that produce high water volumes. Fracturing treatments, formation characteristics, proppant types, and post fracture treatment production results are examined in detail. A production case study that focuses on the impact of proppant selection in wells completed in formations that produce hydrocarbons with a high water cut will also be presented. This paper analyzes laboratory tests that were performed to measure the water and oil flow rates of various commonly used proppants. A case study on how Decreased Water Flow Proppant (DWFP) performed in the Granite Wash in the Texas panhandle is also highlighted. Post fracture treatment production results are compared to traditional proppants used in direct offset wells. Laboratory testing showed DWFP had much lower water flow and higher oil flow through the proppant pack compared to traditional proppants. The results of the laboratory tests will be used to explain and support the production case study. The field case study proves that DWFP reduced formation water production, while increasing hydrocarbon production compared to traditional proppants used in offset wells. This innovative proppant appears to decrease the relative permeability to water in the proppant pack, resulting in lower water production and higher hydrocarbon production compared to conventional proppants. This paper introduces the first proppant specifically designed for fracturing treatments in high water cut reservoirs. A new laboratory test method of measuring water flow rate through a proppant pack was specifically developed for this type of proppant. The proppant’s wettability is introduced as a new proppant selection factor for fracturing treatments in high water cut reservoirs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信