回顾OpenStack开发人员的职业道路

Perry van Wesel, B. Lin, G. Robles, Alexander Serebrenik
{"title":"回顾OpenStack开发人员的职业道路","authors":"Perry van Wesel, B. Lin, G. Robles, Alexander Serebrenik","doi":"10.1109/ICSME.2017.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Career perspectives are known to motivate software engineers. However, so far, career perspectives have been mostly studied within traditional software development companies. In our work we take a complementary approach and study career paths of open source developers, focusing on their advancement through the code review hierarchy, from developers to reviewers and further to core reviewers.To gain understanding of code review career paths we conduct an exploratory case study of the OpenStack community. Based on the case study we have publicized anonymized research data and formulated four hypotheses pertaining to career paths of contributors in modern multi-company open source projects. We conjecture that(i) developers and reviewers are separate subpopulations with little movement between them, (ii-a) the turnover of the core reviewers is high and rapid, (ii-b) companies are interested in having core reviewers among their staff, and (iii) being a core reviewer is beneficial for career.Validity of those hypotheses in other multi-company open source projects should be investigated in the follow-up studies.","PeriodicalId":147888,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing Career Paths of the OpenStack Developers\",\"authors\":\"Perry van Wesel, B. Lin, G. Robles, Alexander Serebrenik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSME.2017.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Career perspectives are known to motivate software engineers. However, so far, career perspectives have been mostly studied within traditional software development companies. In our work we take a complementary approach and study career paths of open source developers, focusing on their advancement through the code review hierarchy, from developers to reviewers and further to core reviewers.To gain understanding of code review career paths we conduct an exploratory case study of the OpenStack community. Based on the case study we have publicized anonymized research data and formulated four hypotheses pertaining to career paths of contributors in modern multi-company open source projects. We conjecture that(i) developers and reviewers are separate subpopulations with little movement between them, (ii-a) the turnover of the core reviewers is high and rapid, (ii-b) companies are interested in having core reviewers among their staff, and (iii) being a core reviewer is beneficial for career.Validity of those hypotheses in other multi-company open source projects should be investigated in the follow-up studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2017.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2017.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

众所周知,职业前景能够激励软件工程师。然而,到目前为止,职业前景的研究主要集中在传统的软件开发公司。在我们的工作中,我们采用一种互补的方法,研究开源开发人员的职业道路,关注他们在代码审查层次结构中的进步,从开发人员到审查人员,再到核心审查人员。为了了解代码审查的职业道路,我们对OpenStack社区进行了一个探索性的案例研究。在案例研究的基础上,我们公开了匿名的研究数据,并提出了四个关于现代多公司开源项目贡献者职业道路的假设。我们推测:(1)开发者和审稿人是独立的子群体,他们之间几乎没有移动,(2 -a)核心审稿人的流动率高且快,(2 -b)公司对员工中有核心审稿人感兴趣,(3)成为核心审稿人对职业生涯有益。这些假设在其他多公司开源项目中的有效性需要在后续研究中进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reviewing Career Paths of the OpenStack Developers
Career perspectives are known to motivate software engineers. However, so far, career perspectives have been mostly studied within traditional software development companies. In our work we take a complementary approach and study career paths of open source developers, focusing on their advancement through the code review hierarchy, from developers to reviewers and further to core reviewers.To gain understanding of code review career paths we conduct an exploratory case study of the OpenStack community. Based on the case study we have publicized anonymized research data and formulated four hypotheses pertaining to career paths of contributors in modern multi-company open source projects. We conjecture that(i) developers and reviewers are separate subpopulations with little movement between them, (ii-a) the turnover of the core reviewers is high and rapid, (ii-b) companies are interested in having core reviewers among their staff, and (iii) being a core reviewer is beneficial for career.Validity of those hypotheses in other multi-company open source projects should be investigated in the follow-up studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信