第38届国际心肺移植学会年会报告,法国尼斯,2018年4月11-14日

B. Levvey
{"title":"第38届国际心肺移植学会年会报告,法国尼斯,2018年4月11-14日","authors":"B. Levvey","doi":"10.33235/TJA.28.1.15-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘10 Years On: The Significant Impact of Controlled DCD Lung Donors on Lung Transplant Opportunities and Outcomes’\nPurpose Since 2006, the Alfred Hospital has increasingly utilised controlled DCD donor lungs to optimise LTx opportunities and reduced waiting list (WL) deaths. This study evaluated the impact of DCD donation on LTx WL time and mortality, and compared post-LTx outcomes of DCD and contemporaneous DBD LTx performed over the first 10 years.\nMethod This was a retrospective analysis of all LTx done at our institution between May 2006 and February 2017 (n=696, 150 DCD LTx, 546 DBD LTx) was undertaken. WL time/mortality, donor and recipient demographics, early outcome measures, survival and cause of death were compared. Our institution regularly utilises extended DCD and DBD donor lungs; however, it does not yet routinely utilise ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to evaluate these extended donor lungs, unlike many programs in the USA and Europe.\nResults The use of DCD donors has resulted in 25% more LTx annually, reduced overall WL times (245 to 135 days, p<0.001) and WL mortality (29% to 5%, p<0.01) from 2006 to 2017 respectively. Compared to DBD, DCD donors were intubated in ICU Longer (115 vs 79hrs, p<0.01), were older (45 vs 41 yrs, p<0.01) and were less commonly distant (>300 km) donors (20% vs 35%, p<0.01). DCD recipients compared to DBD had a reduced WL time (101 vs 120 days, p=0.03) and longer graft ischaemic time (323 vs 287 mins, p<0.01). There was no difference in intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital length of stay between DCD and DBD; and importantly, no significant difference in 1, 5 or 10 year survival rates comparing DCD vs DBD (96%, 69% and 53% vs 92%, 64% and 51% respectively, p=ns).\nConclusions Controlled DCD donation has significantly and safely increased overall LTx numbers, without reducing DBD LTx (Figure 1), and has also reduced WL time and mortality with excellent 1, 5 and 10 year LTx survival for both DCD and DBD LTx compared to ISHLT at our institution (Figure 2). Importantly, our results also show that EVLP is not required for a successful utilisation of DCD donor lungs for LTx.","PeriodicalId":434641,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Journal of Australasia","volume":"07 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on Australian DCD lung donation and transplant journey\\nReport from the 38th Annual Meeting — International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Nice, France: 11–14 April 2018\",\"authors\":\"B. Levvey\",\"doi\":\"10.33235/TJA.28.1.15-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘10 Years On: The Significant Impact of Controlled DCD Lung Donors on Lung Transplant Opportunities and Outcomes’\\nPurpose Since 2006, the Alfred Hospital has increasingly utilised controlled DCD donor lungs to optimise LTx opportunities and reduced waiting list (WL) deaths. This study evaluated the impact of DCD donation on LTx WL time and mortality, and compared post-LTx outcomes of DCD and contemporaneous DBD LTx performed over the first 10 years.\\nMethod This was a retrospective analysis of all LTx done at our institution between May 2006 and February 2017 (n=696, 150 DCD LTx, 546 DBD LTx) was undertaken. WL time/mortality, donor and recipient demographics, early outcome measures, survival and cause of death were compared. Our institution regularly utilises extended DCD and DBD donor lungs; however, it does not yet routinely utilise ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to evaluate these extended donor lungs, unlike many programs in the USA and Europe.\\nResults The use of DCD donors has resulted in 25% more LTx annually, reduced overall WL times (245 to 135 days, p<0.001) and WL mortality (29% to 5%, p<0.01) from 2006 to 2017 respectively. Compared to DBD, DCD donors were intubated in ICU Longer (115 vs 79hrs, p<0.01), were older (45 vs 41 yrs, p<0.01) and were less commonly distant (>300 km) donors (20% vs 35%, p<0.01). DCD recipients compared to DBD had a reduced WL time (101 vs 120 days, p=0.03) and longer graft ischaemic time (323 vs 287 mins, p<0.01). There was no difference in intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital length of stay between DCD and DBD; and importantly, no significant difference in 1, 5 or 10 year survival rates comparing DCD vs DBD (96%, 69% and 53% vs 92%, 64% and 51% respectively, p=ns).\\nConclusions Controlled DCD donation has significantly and safely increased overall LTx numbers, without reducing DBD LTx (Figure 1), and has also reduced WL time and mortality with excellent 1, 5 and 10 year LTx survival for both DCD and DBD LTx compared to ISHLT at our institution (Figure 2). Importantly, our results also show that EVLP is not required for a successful utilisation of DCD donor lungs for LTx.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Journal of Australasia\",\"volume\":\"07 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Journal of Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33235/TJA.28.1.15-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33235/TJA.28.1.15-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“10年来:受控DCD肺供体对肺移植机会和结果的重大影响”目的自2006年以来,阿尔弗雷德医院越来越多地利用受控DCD供体肺来优化LTx机会并减少等候名单(WL)死亡。本研究评估了DCD捐赠对LTx WL时间和死亡率的影响,并比较了前10年DCD和同期DBD LTx的LTx后结果。方法回顾性分析2006年5月至2017年2月在我院进行的所有LTx (n=696, 150 DCD LTx, 546 DBD LTx)。比较WL时间/死亡率、供体和受体人口统计、早期结局指标、生存率和死亡原因。我们的机构定期使用扩展DCD和DBD供体肺;然而,与美国和欧洲的许多项目不同,它还没有常规地利用离体肺灌注(EVLP)来评估这些扩展的供体肺。结果使用DCD献血者每年LTx增加25%,总WL次数(245 ~ 135天,p300 km)减少(20% vs 35%, p<0.01)。与DBD相比,DCD受体的WL时间缩短(101天vs 120天,p=0.03),移植物缺血时间延长(323分钟vs 287分钟,p<0.01)。DCD和DBD患者的重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间无差异;重要的是,DCD与DBD相比,1年、5年或10年生存率无显著差异(分别为96%、69%和53%对92%、64%和51%,p=ns)。在我们的机构,与ISHLT相比,可控的DCD捐赠显著且安全地增加了总体LTx数量,而没有降低DBD LTx(图1),并且还减少了WL时间和死亡率,DCD和DBD LTx的LTx生存率均为1年、5年和10年(图2)。重要的是,我们的结果还表明,EVLP不是成功利用DCD供体肺进行LTx的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflections on Australian DCD lung donation and transplant journey Report from the 38th Annual Meeting — International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Nice, France: 11–14 April 2018
‘10 Years On: The Significant Impact of Controlled DCD Lung Donors on Lung Transplant Opportunities and Outcomes’ Purpose Since 2006, the Alfred Hospital has increasingly utilised controlled DCD donor lungs to optimise LTx opportunities and reduced waiting list (WL) deaths. This study evaluated the impact of DCD donation on LTx WL time and mortality, and compared post-LTx outcomes of DCD and contemporaneous DBD LTx performed over the first 10 years. Method This was a retrospective analysis of all LTx done at our institution between May 2006 and February 2017 (n=696, 150 DCD LTx, 546 DBD LTx) was undertaken. WL time/mortality, donor and recipient demographics, early outcome measures, survival and cause of death were compared. Our institution regularly utilises extended DCD and DBD donor lungs; however, it does not yet routinely utilise ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to evaluate these extended donor lungs, unlike many programs in the USA and Europe. Results The use of DCD donors has resulted in 25% more LTx annually, reduced overall WL times (245 to 135 days, p<0.001) and WL mortality (29% to 5%, p<0.01) from 2006 to 2017 respectively. Compared to DBD, DCD donors were intubated in ICU Longer (115 vs 79hrs, p<0.01), were older (45 vs 41 yrs, p<0.01) and were less commonly distant (>300 km) donors (20% vs 35%, p<0.01). DCD recipients compared to DBD had a reduced WL time (101 vs 120 days, p=0.03) and longer graft ischaemic time (323 vs 287 mins, p<0.01). There was no difference in intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital length of stay between DCD and DBD; and importantly, no significant difference in 1, 5 or 10 year survival rates comparing DCD vs DBD (96%, 69% and 53% vs 92%, 64% and 51% respectively, p=ns). Conclusions Controlled DCD donation has significantly and safely increased overall LTx numbers, without reducing DBD LTx (Figure 1), and has also reduced WL time and mortality with excellent 1, 5 and 10 year LTx survival for both DCD and DBD LTx compared to ISHLT at our institution (Figure 2). Importantly, our results also show that EVLP is not required for a successful utilisation of DCD donor lungs for LTx.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信