Christoph Breitschopf, Günther Blaschek, T. Scheidl
{"title":"进化优化中算子选择策略的比较","authors":"Christoph Breitschopf, Günther Blaschek, T. Scheidl","doi":"10.1109/IRI.2006.252402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are an effective paradigm for solving many types of optimization problems. They are flexible and can be adapted to new problem classes with little effort. EAs apply operators on the elements of a population. When multiple operators are involved, their distribution is based on fixed probabilities. EAs therefore can not react on changes during an optimization which often leads to premature convergence. In this paper, we present a variation of our approach described in (C. Breitschopf et. al, 2005) for a self-adapting operator selection that is able to monitor the success of the operators over time and gives priority to currently successful operators. We compare the results with another approach we implemented as first strategy for considering operator success as well as analyze under which circumstances which approach should be preferred","PeriodicalId":402255,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Operator Selection Strategies in Evolutionary Optimization\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Breitschopf, Günther Blaschek, T. Scheidl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IRI.2006.252402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are an effective paradigm for solving many types of optimization problems. They are flexible and can be adapted to new problem classes with little effort. EAs apply operators on the elements of a population. When multiple operators are involved, their distribution is based on fixed probabilities. EAs therefore can not react on changes during an optimization which often leads to premature convergence. In this paper, we present a variation of our approach described in (C. Breitschopf et. al, 2005) for a self-adapting operator selection that is able to monitor the success of the operators over time and gives priority to currently successful operators. We compare the results with another approach we implemented as first strategy for considering operator success as well as analyze under which circumstances which approach should be preferred\",\"PeriodicalId\":402255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI.2006.252402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI.2006.252402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
进化算法(EAs)是解决许多类型优化问题的有效范例。它们很灵活,可以毫不费力地适应新的问题类。ea对种群的元素应用运算符。当涉及多个算子时,它们的分布基于固定的概率。因此,ea不能对优化过程中的变化做出反应,这通常会导致过早收敛。在本文中,我们提出了(C. Breitschopf et. al ., 2005)中描述的方法的一种变体,用于自适应运营商选择,能够随着时间的推移监测运营商的成功,并优先考虑当前成功的运营商。我们将结果与我们实施的另一种方法进行比较,以考虑操作人员的成功,并分析在哪种情况下应该优先采用哪种方法
A Comparison of Operator Selection Strategies in Evolutionary Optimization
Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are an effective paradigm for solving many types of optimization problems. They are flexible and can be adapted to new problem classes with little effort. EAs apply operators on the elements of a population. When multiple operators are involved, their distribution is based on fixed probabilities. EAs therefore can not react on changes during an optimization which often leads to premature convergence. In this paper, we present a variation of our approach described in (C. Breitschopf et. al, 2005) for a self-adapting operator selection that is able to monitor the success of the operators over time and gives priority to currently successful operators. We compare the results with another approach we implemented as first strategy for considering operator success as well as analyze under which circumstances which approach should be preferred