Michael Stilkerich, D. Lohmann, Wolfgang Schröder-Preikschat
{"title":"存储器保护选项","authors":"Michael Stilkerich, D. Lohmann, Wolfgang Schröder-Preikschat","doi":"10.1145/1772643.1772649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is hardware- and software-based memory protection that can improve the dependability of software systems. The two variants vary in the degree of protection and the amount and sites of overhead. The decision for a particular mechanism therefore highly depends on the application and deployment scenario.\n We propose a system suited for deeply embedded systems that allows to choose among no protection, software-based protection, hardware-based protection or a combination of the two without the need to change the application. In this paper, we present the current state of this work and support our claim that the best-suited memory protection type depends on the application by a preliminary evaluation.","PeriodicalId":221742,"journal":{"name":"EDCC-CARS","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memory protection at option\",\"authors\":\"Michael Stilkerich, D. Lohmann, Wolfgang Schröder-Preikschat\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1772643.1772649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is hardware- and software-based memory protection that can improve the dependability of software systems. The two variants vary in the degree of protection and the amount and sites of overhead. The decision for a particular mechanism therefore highly depends on the application and deployment scenario.\\n We propose a system suited for deeply embedded systems that allows to choose among no protection, software-based protection, hardware-based protection or a combination of the two without the need to change the application. In this paper, we present the current state of this work and support our claim that the best-suited memory protection type depends on the application by a preliminary evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDCC-CARS\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDCC-CARS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1772643.1772649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDCC-CARS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1772643.1772649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
There is hardware- and software-based memory protection that can improve the dependability of software systems. The two variants vary in the degree of protection and the amount and sites of overhead. The decision for a particular mechanism therefore highly depends on the application and deployment scenario.
We propose a system suited for deeply embedded systems that allows to choose among no protection, software-based protection, hardware-based protection or a combination of the two without the need to change the application. In this paper, we present the current state of this work and support our claim that the best-suited memory protection type depends on the application by a preliminary evaluation.