x -连锁和常染色体隐性双球蛋白血症的人口学和临床特征比较

Parham Mardi, M. Jamee, Mohammad Hossein Eslamian
{"title":"x -连锁和常染色体隐性双球蛋白血症的人口学和临床特征比较","authors":"Parham Mardi, M. Jamee, Mohammad Hossein Eslamian","doi":"10.18502/igj.v4i1.8394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Congenital agammaglobulinemia is an inborn error of immunity, resulting in the impairment of effective antibody production. Agammaglobulinemia may be due to X-linked or autosomal genetic abnormalities. The primary defect in X-Linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) and autosomal recessive agammaglobulinemia (ARAG) is the B cell precursors’ failure to mature B-lymphocytes and, ultimately, plasma cells. This study aims to evaluate the differences in clinical and paraclinical characteristics of XLA and ARAG patients. \nMethod: A total of 58 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. The data were extracted from the Iranian primary immunodeficiency registry (IPIDR). Forty-eight of the patients were diagnosed with XLA, while the other ten were diagnosed with ARAG. Measures including demographic data, clinical manifestations, and laboratory data of the patients were compared between the groups. \nResults: Patients with ARAG, presented manifestations at an earlier age and had a lower diagnosis delay compared to XLA patients. However, the mortality rate was not significantly affected. The pattern of organ involvement also differed between the two groups, as patients with ARAG showed manifestations that are more chronic in nature (e.g., autoimmunity, lymphoproliferation, and allergy). In contrast, XLA patients were more prone to infections and other associated complications (e.g., meningitis, sinusitis, diarrhea, and bronchiectasis). Meningitis was exclusively observed in the XLA group. The number of CD19+ B cells was significantly higher in the ARAG group (P=0.002), While the level of IgM was significantly higher in the XLA group (P=0.045). \nConclusion: Identifying the clinical presentations of XLA and ARAG, may assist clinicians in early diagnosis in the setting of limited available genetic studies.","PeriodicalId":406184,"journal":{"name":"Immunology and Genetics Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Among X-Linked and Autosomal Recessive Agammaglobulinemia\",\"authors\":\"Parham Mardi, M. Jamee, Mohammad Hossein Eslamian\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/igj.v4i1.8394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Congenital agammaglobulinemia is an inborn error of immunity, resulting in the impairment of effective antibody production. Agammaglobulinemia may be due to X-linked or autosomal genetic abnormalities. The primary defect in X-Linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) and autosomal recessive agammaglobulinemia (ARAG) is the B cell precursors’ failure to mature B-lymphocytes and, ultimately, plasma cells. This study aims to evaluate the differences in clinical and paraclinical characteristics of XLA and ARAG patients. \\nMethod: A total of 58 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. The data were extracted from the Iranian primary immunodeficiency registry (IPIDR). Forty-eight of the patients were diagnosed with XLA, while the other ten were diagnosed with ARAG. Measures including demographic data, clinical manifestations, and laboratory data of the patients were compared between the groups. \\nResults: Patients with ARAG, presented manifestations at an earlier age and had a lower diagnosis delay compared to XLA patients. However, the mortality rate was not significantly affected. The pattern of organ involvement also differed between the two groups, as patients with ARAG showed manifestations that are more chronic in nature (e.g., autoimmunity, lymphoproliferation, and allergy). In contrast, XLA patients were more prone to infections and other associated complications (e.g., meningitis, sinusitis, diarrhea, and bronchiectasis). Meningitis was exclusively observed in the XLA group. The number of CD19+ B cells was significantly higher in the ARAG group (P=0.002), While the level of IgM was significantly higher in the XLA group (P=0.045). \\nConclusion: Identifying the clinical presentations of XLA and ARAG, may assist clinicians in early diagnosis in the setting of limited available genetic studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunology and Genetics Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunology and Genetics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/igj.v4i1.8394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunology and Genetics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/igj.v4i1.8394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先天性无球蛋白血症是一种先天性免疫错误,导致有效抗体产生受损。无球蛋白血症可能是由于x连锁或常染色体遗传异常。x连锁无球蛋白血症(XLA)和常染色体隐性无球蛋白血症(ARAG)的主要缺陷是B细胞前体不能成熟B淋巴细胞,最终不能成熟浆细胞。本研究旨在评价XLA和ARAG患者临床和临床旁特征的差异。方法:对58例患者进行回顾性研究。数据来自伊朗原发性免疫缺陷登记处(IPIDR)。48例患者被诊断为XLA, 10例被诊断为ARAG。比较两组患者的人口学资料、临床表现和实验室资料。结果:与XLA患者相比,ARAG患者表现较早,诊断延迟较短。然而,死亡率没有受到显著影响。器官受累的模式在两组之间也有所不同,因为ARAG患者表现出更慢性的表现(例如,自身免疫、淋巴细胞增殖和过敏)。相比之下,XLA患者更容易发生感染和其他相关并发症(如脑膜炎、鼻窦炎、腹泻和支气管扩张)。仅在XLA组观察到脑膜炎。ARAG组CD19+ B细胞数量显著增高(P=0.002), XLA组IgM细胞水平显著增高(P=0.045)。结论:确定XLA和ARAG的临床表现,可以帮助临床医生在有限的遗传研究背景下进行早期诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Among X-Linked and Autosomal Recessive Agammaglobulinemia
Background: Congenital agammaglobulinemia is an inborn error of immunity, resulting in the impairment of effective antibody production. Agammaglobulinemia may be due to X-linked or autosomal genetic abnormalities. The primary defect in X-Linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) and autosomal recessive agammaglobulinemia (ARAG) is the B cell precursors’ failure to mature B-lymphocytes and, ultimately, plasma cells. This study aims to evaluate the differences in clinical and paraclinical characteristics of XLA and ARAG patients. Method: A total of 58 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. The data were extracted from the Iranian primary immunodeficiency registry (IPIDR). Forty-eight of the patients were diagnosed with XLA, while the other ten were diagnosed with ARAG. Measures including demographic data, clinical manifestations, and laboratory data of the patients were compared between the groups. Results: Patients with ARAG, presented manifestations at an earlier age and had a lower diagnosis delay compared to XLA patients. However, the mortality rate was not significantly affected. The pattern of organ involvement also differed between the two groups, as patients with ARAG showed manifestations that are more chronic in nature (e.g., autoimmunity, lymphoproliferation, and allergy). In contrast, XLA patients were more prone to infections and other associated complications (e.g., meningitis, sinusitis, diarrhea, and bronchiectasis). Meningitis was exclusively observed in the XLA group. The number of CD19+ B cells was significantly higher in the ARAG group (P=0.002), While the level of IgM was significantly higher in the XLA group (P=0.045). Conclusion: Identifying the clinical presentations of XLA and ARAG, may assist clinicians in early diagnosis in the setting of limited available genetic studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信