医疗数据传输的带宽分配方案

D. Lin, F. Labeau
{"title":"医疗数据传输的带宽分配方案","authors":"D. Lin, F. Labeau","doi":"10.1109/BIOWIRELESS.2011.5724382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, two bandwidth allocation schemes for the transmission of medical data in the IEEE 802.11n based WLAN are proposed. These two schemes are based on the same idea: offline medical data are transmitted on the subcarriers for online traffic when these subcarriers are available; otherwise, these data are stored in patient devices. This is a tradeoff between the traffic load in the WLAN and the memory size of patient devices. Based on this idea, two schemes are designed to save the required number of subcarriers. The difference between these two schemes is that the first scheme only focuses on saving subcarriers, while the second scheme takes into account saving subcarriers and the security of data stored in patient devices. Next, the relationship of device memory and the probability of illegal access to data is discussed. Finally, the number of required subcarriers and the probability of illegal access to data are compared in these two proposed schemes. In addition, these two proposed schemes are also compared with a traditional scheme, which is viewed as a benchmark.","PeriodicalId":430449,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Topical Conference on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and Sensing Systems","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schemes of bandwidth allocation for the transmission of medical data\",\"authors\":\"D. Lin, F. Labeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BIOWIRELESS.2011.5724382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, two bandwidth allocation schemes for the transmission of medical data in the IEEE 802.11n based WLAN are proposed. These two schemes are based on the same idea: offline medical data are transmitted on the subcarriers for online traffic when these subcarriers are available; otherwise, these data are stored in patient devices. This is a tradeoff between the traffic load in the WLAN and the memory size of patient devices. Based on this idea, two schemes are designed to save the required number of subcarriers. The difference between these two schemes is that the first scheme only focuses on saving subcarriers, while the second scheme takes into account saving subcarriers and the security of data stored in patient devices. Next, the relationship of device memory and the probability of illegal access to data is discussed. Finally, the number of required subcarriers and the probability of illegal access to data are compared in these two proposed schemes. In addition, these two proposed schemes are also compared with a traditional scheme, which is viewed as a benchmark.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE Topical Conference on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and Sensing Systems\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE Topical Conference on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and Sensing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOWIRELESS.2011.5724382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Topical Conference on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and Sensing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOWIRELESS.2011.5724382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了在基于IEEE 802.11n的无线局域网中传输医疗数据的两种带宽分配方案。这两种方案基于相同的思想:当这些子载波可用时,将离线医疗数据传输到在线流量的子载波上;否则,这些数据将存储在患者设备中。这是在WLAN中的流量负载和患者设备的内存大小之间的权衡。在此基础上,设计了两种节省所需子载波数量的方案。这两种方案的区别在于,第一种方案只关注子载波的保存,而第二种方案则考虑了子载波的保存和存储在患者设备中的数据的安全性。其次,讨论了设备内存与非法访问数据概率的关系。最后,比较了两种方案所需的子载波数量和非法访问数据的概率。此外,还将这两种方案与传统方案进行了比较,作为基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Schemes of bandwidth allocation for the transmission of medical data
In this paper, two bandwidth allocation schemes for the transmission of medical data in the IEEE 802.11n based WLAN are proposed. These two schemes are based on the same idea: offline medical data are transmitted on the subcarriers for online traffic when these subcarriers are available; otherwise, these data are stored in patient devices. This is a tradeoff between the traffic load in the WLAN and the memory size of patient devices. Based on this idea, two schemes are designed to save the required number of subcarriers. The difference between these two schemes is that the first scheme only focuses on saving subcarriers, while the second scheme takes into account saving subcarriers and the security of data stored in patient devices. Next, the relationship of device memory and the probability of illegal access to data is discussed. Finally, the number of required subcarriers and the probability of illegal access to data are compared in these two proposed schemes. In addition, these two proposed schemes are also compared with a traditional scheme, which is viewed as a benchmark.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信