加权积法与理想解法相似度排序方法的比较:复杂性与准确性

N. S. Fitriasari, Syifa Afifah Fitriani, R. A. Sukamto
{"title":"加权积法与理想解法相似度排序方法的比较:复杂性与准确性","authors":"N. S. Fitriasari, Syifa Afifah Fitriani, R. A. Sukamto","doi":"10.1109/ICSITECH.2017.8257155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weighted Product (WP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are two methods widely used to assist in making decision. As research on the comparison of both methods seems to have not been extensive, this study aims to compare the two methods by looking at their complexity and accuracy. The measurement of their complexity was carried out by using Cyclomatic Complexity and their accuracy was calculated based on the error rate obtained. The results show that although TOPSIS method has a higher level of complexity, which is 8 compared to 5 of WP method, TOPSIS has a higher accuracy rate of 73% compared to WP's 67%. Hence, TOPSIS method is better.","PeriodicalId":165045,"journal":{"name":"2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of weighted product method and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method: Complexity and accuracy\",\"authors\":\"N. S. Fitriasari, Syifa Afifah Fitriani, R. A. Sukamto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSITECH.2017.8257155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Weighted Product (WP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are two methods widely used to assist in making decision. As research on the comparison of both methods seems to have not been extensive, this study aims to compare the two methods by looking at their complexity and accuracy. The measurement of their complexity was carried out by using Cyclomatic Complexity and their accuracy was calculated based on the error rate obtained. The results show that although TOPSIS method has a higher level of complexity, which is 8 compared to 5 of WP method, TOPSIS has a higher accuracy rate of 73% compared to WP's 67%. Hence, TOPSIS method is better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITECH.2017.8257155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITECH.2017.8257155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

加权积法(WP)和TOPSIS法(TOPSIS)是目前广泛用于辅助决策的两种方法。由于两种方法的比较研究似乎并不广泛,因此本研究旨在从其复杂性和准确性两个方面对两种方法进行比较。采用圈复杂度法对其复杂度进行测量,并根据得到的错误率计算其精度。结果表明,虽然TOPSIS方法的复杂度为8,而WP方法的复杂度为5,但TOPSIS的准确率为73%,而WP方法的准确率为67%。因此,TOPSIS方法比较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of weighted product method and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method: Complexity and accuracy
Weighted Product (WP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are two methods widely used to assist in making decision. As research on the comparison of both methods seems to have not been extensive, this study aims to compare the two methods by looking at their complexity and accuracy. The measurement of their complexity was carried out by using Cyclomatic Complexity and their accuracy was calculated based on the error rate obtained. The results show that although TOPSIS method has a higher level of complexity, which is 8 compared to 5 of WP method, TOPSIS has a higher accuracy rate of 73% compared to WP's 67%. Hence, TOPSIS method is better.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信