{"title":"“人们有理由怀疑”——在《博利波斯历史》中惊叹道","authors":"L. Hau","doi":"10.1515/9783110563559-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the use of θαῦμα (thauma) and its cognate verbs and adjectives in Polybios' Histories. It argues that this word group is used in four basic ways: 1. The expression 'I wonder at so-and-so's stupidity/absurdity/other undesirable quality' is used very frequently as a rhetorical opening of speeches, both the ones orginally delivered in Greek and those originally delivered in Latin. 2. Thauma and its adjectives are used to designate natural and ethnographical marvels, but only occasionally, and Polybios generally seems to associate these with a less serious and investigative type of historiography than his own since an investigation into causes will most often dispel the wonder. 3. In methodolog-ical passages Polybios posits his own historiographical project and its topic as a marvel, placing him in the tradition of historiographers who stress the greatness of their topic and achievement. 4. The most frequent use of thauma-words in the Histories is to designate human qualities – moral and intellectual – as marvels. The article concludes that Polybios redefines thauma and its cognates in order to further his own historiographical agenda: partly to demonstrate that it is human beings who make history happen, not supernatural powers, and partly to exhort the reader didactically to imitate marvellous human beings of the past in order to become marvellous himself. Polybios could only do this because the category of the marvellous had considerably inbuilt flexibility, but it was only worth doing because the marvellous was a powerful conceptual category which immediately signalled that its content was not just interesting, but also important, and worth remembering.","PeriodicalId":301830,"journal":{"name":"Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘One might rightly wonder’ – marvelling in Polybios Histories\",\"authors\":\"L. Hau\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110563559-006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the use of θαῦμα (thauma) and its cognate verbs and adjectives in Polybios' Histories. It argues that this word group is used in four basic ways: 1. The expression 'I wonder at so-and-so's stupidity/absurdity/other undesirable quality' is used very frequently as a rhetorical opening of speeches, both the ones orginally delivered in Greek and those originally delivered in Latin. 2. Thauma and its adjectives are used to designate natural and ethnographical marvels, but only occasionally, and Polybios generally seems to associate these with a less serious and investigative type of historiography than his own since an investigation into causes will most often dispel the wonder. 3. In methodolog-ical passages Polybios posits his own historiographical project and its topic as a marvel, placing him in the tradition of historiographers who stress the greatness of their topic and achievement. 4. The most frequent use of thauma-words in the Histories is to designate human qualities – moral and intellectual – as marvels. The article concludes that Polybios redefines thauma and its cognates in order to further his own historiographical agenda: partly to demonstrate that it is human beings who make history happen, not supernatural powers, and partly to exhort the reader didactically to imitate marvellous human beings of the past in order to become marvellous himself. Polybios could only do this because the category of the marvellous had considerably inbuilt flexibility, but it was only worth doing because the marvellous was a powerful conceptual category which immediately signalled that its content was not just interesting, but also important, and worth remembering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110563559-006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110563559-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文研究了《波利毕斯史》中θα ο μα (thauma)及其同源动词和形容词的用法。它认为这个词组有四种基本用法:1。“我对某某人的愚蠢/荒谬/其他不受欢迎的品质感到惊讶”这句话经常被用作演讲的修辞开场白,无论是最初用希腊语发表的演讲还是最初用拉丁语发表的演讲。Thauma和它的形容词被用来指自然和人种学上的奇迹,但只是偶尔,波利bios通常似乎把这些与一种不那么严肃和调查的史学类型联系在一起,而不是他自己的,因为对原因的调查通常会消除奇迹。3.在方法论的段落中,波利bios把他自己的史学计划和它的主题作为一个奇迹,把他置于历史学家的传统中,他们强调他们的主题和成就的伟大。4. 历史中最常使用的词汇是将人类的品质——道德和智力——称为奇迹。文章的结论是,波利bios重新定义了thauma及其同源词,以进一步推进他自己的历史编纂议程:一方面是为了证明是人类而不是超自然力量创造了历史,另一方面是为了教导读者模仿过去的杰出人物,以使自己变得杰出。波利bios之所以能这么做,是因为“奇妙”这个类别具有相当大的内在灵活性,但之所以值得这么做,只是因为“奇妙”是一个强大的概念类别,它立即表明,它的内容不仅有趣,而且重要,值得记住。
‘One might rightly wonder’ – marvelling in Polybios Histories
This paper investigates the use of θαῦμα (thauma) and its cognate verbs and adjectives in Polybios' Histories. It argues that this word group is used in four basic ways: 1. The expression 'I wonder at so-and-so's stupidity/absurdity/other undesirable quality' is used very frequently as a rhetorical opening of speeches, both the ones orginally delivered in Greek and those originally delivered in Latin. 2. Thauma and its adjectives are used to designate natural and ethnographical marvels, but only occasionally, and Polybios generally seems to associate these with a less serious and investigative type of historiography than his own since an investigation into causes will most often dispel the wonder. 3. In methodolog-ical passages Polybios posits his own historiographical project and its topic as a marvel, placing him in the tradition of historiographers who stress the greatness of their topic and achievement. 4. The most frequent use of thauma-words in the Histories is to designate human qualities – moral and intellectual – as marvels. The article concludes that Polybios redefines thauma and its cognates in order to further his own historiographical agenda: partly to demonstrate that it is human beings who make history happen, not supernatural powers, and partly to exhort the reader didactically to imitate marvellous human beings of the past in order to become marvellous himself. Polybios could only do this because the category of the marvellous had considerably inbuilt flexibility, but it was only worth doing because the marvellous was a powerful conceptual category which immediately signalled that its content was not just interesting, but also important, and worth remembering.