投资仲裁中的环境追踪:世界与印度

Shouvik Bhattacharya, Alex Koshy, Kaira Mariah Pinheiro
{"title":"投资仲裁中的环境追踪:世界与印度","authors":"Shouvik Bhattacharya, Alex Koshy, Kaira Mariah Pinheiro","doi":"10.3366/gels.2022.0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ongoing global energy crisis and wave of climate-related disasters have prompted renewed attention to States’ powers of enacting regulations for environmental protection and sustainable development. The language used in international investment agreements and treaties informs and determines the extent to which States can introduce progressive environmental policies, while simultaneously ensuring the protection of investors’ rights and interests. The following article critically analyzes such treaty language by discussing the various approaches to and developments in incorporating environmental concerns, and studies how tribunals have interpreted such clauses. In so doing, the article traces a gradual but distinct shift in the approach of investment arbitration tribunals to environmental protection over the past few decades. The article also explores the recent global trend of States unilaterally terminating investment treaties, with a particular focus on India. India's response to its contentious relationship with investor-State disputes may prove instructive for States looking to attract investment while also balancing the protection of the environment.","PeriodicalId":229000,"journal":{"name":"Global Energy Law and Sustainability","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracking the Environment in Investment Arbitration: The World and India\",\"authors\":\"Shouvik Bhattacharya, Alex Koshy, Kaira Mariah Pinheiro\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/gels.2022.0079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ongoing global energy crisis and wave of climate-related disasters have prompted renewed attention to States’ powers of enacting regulations for environmental protection and sustainable development. The language used in international investment agreements and treaties informs and determines the extent to which States can introduce progressive environmental policies, while simultaneously ensuring the protection of investors’ rights and interests. The following article critically analyzes such treaty language by discussing the various approaches to and developments in incorporating environmental concerns, and studies how tribunals have interpreted such clauses. In so doing, the article traces a gradual but distinct shift in the approach of investment arbitration tribunals to environmental protection over the past few decades. The article also explores the recent global trend of States unilaterally terminating investment treaties, with a particular focus on India. India's response to its contentious relationship with investor-State disputes may prove instructive for States looking to attract investment while also balancing the protection of the environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Energy Law and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Energy Law and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/gels.2022.0079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Energy Law and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/gels.2022.0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前的全球能源危机和一波又一波与气候有关的灾害促使人们重新注意国家颁布环境保护和可持续发展条例的权力。国际投资协定和条约中使用的语言为各国在确保保护投资者的权利和利益的同时可以采取进步的环境政策提供信息并决定其程度。下面的文章通过讨论处理环境问题的各种方法和在纳入环境问题方面的发展,批判性地分析了这些条约语言,并研究了法庭如何解释这些条款。在此过程中,文章追溯了过去几十年来投资仲裁法庭在环境保护方面的一个渐进但明显的转变。本文还探讨了最近各国单方面终止投资条约的全球趋势,并特别关注印度。印度对其与投资者-国家争端之间有争议的关系所作的反应可能对那些希望吸引投资同时又要平衡保护环境的国家具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracking the Environment in Investment Arbitration: The World and India
The ongoing global energy crisis and wave of climate-related disasters have prompted renewed attention to States’ powers of enacting regulations for environmental protection and sustainable development. The language used in international investment agreements and treaties informs and determines the extent to which States can introduce progressive environmental policies, while simultaneously ensuring the protection of investors’ rights and interests. The following article critically analyzes such treaty language by discussing the various approaches to and developments in incorporating environmental concerns, and studies how tribunals have interpreted such clauses. In so doing, the article traces a gradual but distinct shift in the approach of investment arbitration tribunals to environmental protection over the past few decades. The article also explores the recent global trend of States unilaterally terminating investment treaties, with a particular focus on India. India's response to its contentious relationship with investor-State disputes may prove instructive for States looking to attract investment while also balancing the protection of the environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信