践踏敌人:隐喻、文化和国家安全的大数据黑箱

R. Albro
{"title":"践踏敌人:隐喻、文化和国家安全的大数据黑箱","authors":"R. Albro","doi":"10.31979/2377-6188.2018.020103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers how cultural understanding is being brought into the work of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), through an analysis of its Metaphor program. It examines the type of social science underwriting this program, unpacks implications of the agency’s conception of metaphor for understanding so-called cultures of interest, and compares IARPA’s to competing accounts of how metaphor works to create cultural meaning. The article highlights some risks posed by key deficits in the Intelligence Community's (IC) approach to culture, which relies on the cognitive linguistic theories of George Lakoff and colleagues. It also explores the problem of the opacity of these risks for analysts, even as such predictive cultural analytics are becoming a part of intelligence forecasting. This article examines the problem of information secrecy in two ways, by unpacking the opacity of “black box,” algorithm-based social science of culture for end users with little appreciation of their potential biases, and by evaluating the IC's nontransparent approach to foreign cultures, as it underwrites national security assessments.","PeriodicalId":115408,"journal":{"name":"Secrecy and Society","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Troping the Enemy: Metaphor, Culture, and the Big Data Black Boxes of National Security\",\"authors\":\"R. Albro\",\"doi\":\"10.31979/2377-6188.2018.020103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers how cultural understanding is being brought into the work of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), through an analysis of its Metaphor program. It examines the type of social science underwriting this program, unpacks implications of the agency’s conception of metaphor for understanding so-called cultures of interest, and compares IARPA’s to competing accounts of how metaphor works to create cultural meaning. The article highlights some risks posed by key deficits in the Intelligence Community's (IC) approach to culture, which relies on the cognitive linguistic theories of George Lakoff and colleagues. It also explores the problem of the opacity of these risks for analysts, even as such predictive cultural analytics are becoming a part of intelligence forecasting. This article examines the problem of information secrecy in two ways, by unpacking the opacity of “black box,” algorithm-based social science of culture for end users with little appreciation of their potential biases, and by evaluating the IC's nontransparent approach to foreign cultures, as it underwrites national security assessments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Secrecy and Society\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Secrecy and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31979/2377-6188.2018.020103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secrecy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31979/2377-6188.2018.020103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文通过对IARPA的隐喻项目的分析,探讨了文化理解是如何被引入到IARPA的工作中的。它考察了支持该项目的社会科学类型,揭示了该机构对理解所谓的兴趣文化的隐喻概念的含义,并将IARPA的隐喻如何创造文化意义的竞争账户进行了比较。这篇文章强调了情报界(IC)文化研究方法的关键缺陷所带来的一些风险,这种方法依赖于乔治·拉科夫(George Lakoff)及其同事的认知语言学理论。它还探讨了分析师对这些风险不透明的问题,即使这种预测性文化分析正在成为情报预测的一部分。本文从两方面考察了信息保密问题,通过揭示“黑箱”的不透明性,即为终端用户提供的基于算法的社会文化科学,对其潜在的偏见几乎没有认识,以及通过评估IC对外国文化的不透明方法,因为它承担了国家安全评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Troping the Enemy: Metaphor, Culture, and the Big Data Black Boxes of National Security
This article considers how cultural understanding is being brought into the work of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), through an analysis of its Metaphor program. It examines the type of social science underwriting this program, unpacks implications of the agency’s conception of metaphor for understanding so-called cultures of interest, and compares IARPA’s to competing accounts of how metaphor works to create cultural meaning. The article highlights some risks posed by key deficits in the Intelligence Community's (IC) approach to culture, which relies on the cognitive linguistic theories of George Lakoff and colleagues. It also explores the problem of the opacity of these risks for analysts, even as such predictive cultural analytics are becoming a part of intelligence forecasting. This article examines the problem of information secrecy in two ways, by unpacking the opacity of “black box,” algorithm-based social science of culture for end users with little appreciation of their potential biases, and by evaluating the IC's nontransparent approach to foreign cultures, as it underwrites national security assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信