探讨学习障碍识别问卷的构建

R. Reuter, Florian Hauser, Carolin Gold-Veerkamp, T. Stark, Juliane Kis, J. Mottok, J. Abke, Dany Meyer
{"title":"探讨学习障碍识别问卷的构建","authors":"R. Reuter, Florian Hauser, Carolin Gold-Veerkamp, T. Stark, Juliane Kis, J. Mottok, J. Abke, Dany Meyer","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the identification of learning obstacles using the questionnaire method. Therefore, two iterations were proceeded: The first one was part of a survey that was carried out at four locations at universities of applied sciences. We asked students about obstructive facts in general providing items for five learning obstacle dimensions that were set up before; emotional/motivational, epistemological/cognitive, didactical, resource-related and meta-cognitive learning obstacle dimensions. After the general part, we asked them to answer the same question, but in relation to the — in their opinion — most difficult learning content. With this question, we aim to get indications regarding to epistemological obstacles. In a second step, we used the \"Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire\", which was developed by Pintrich [1] as a basis to develop a questionnaire that extracts learning obstacles. In its original version, the \"Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire\" was intended to measure students' learning strategies, but, as the obstacle dimensions were partly derived from learning strategy classification, we chose this already validated questionnaire [2]. Within this iteration, we could confirm a five-factor structure of the questionnaire that could be mapped to the five before set learning obstacle dimensions.","PeriodicalId":102826,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the construction of a questionnaire for the identification of learning obstacles\",\"authors\":\"R. Reuter, Florian Hauser, Carolin Gold-Veerkamp, T. Stark, Juliane Kis, J. Mottok, J. Abke, Dany Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with the identification of learning obstacles using the questionnaire method. Therefore, two iterations were proceeded: The first one was part of a survey that was carried out at four locations at universities of applied sciences. We asked students about obstructive facts in general providing items for five learning obstacle dimensions that were set up before; emotional/motivational, epistemological/cognitive, didactical, resource-related and meta-cognitive learning obstacle dimensions. After the general part, we asked them to answer the same question, but in relation to the — in their opinion — most difficult learning content. With this question, we aim to get indications regarding to epistemological obstacles. In a second step, we used the \\\"Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire\\\", which was developed by Pintrich [1] as a basis to develop a questionnaire that extracts learning obstacles. In its original version, the \\\"Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire\\\" was intended to measure students' learning strategies, but, as the obstacle dimensions were partly derived from learning strategy classification, we chose this already validated questionnaire [2]. Within this iteration, we could confirm a five-factor structure of the questionnaire that could be mapped to the five before set learning obstacle dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用问卷调查法研究学习障碍的识别问题。因此,进行了两次迭代:第一次是在应用科学大学的四个地点进行的调查的一部分。我们通常询问学生关于阻碍性事实的问题,并为之前设置的五个学习障碍维度提供项目;情感/动机、认识论/认知、教学、资源相关和元认知学习障碍维度。在一般部分之后,我们让他们回答了同样的问题,但与他们认为最难的学习内容有关。有了这个问题,我们的目标是得到关于认识论障碍的指示。第二步,我们使用Pintrich[1]开发的“动机学习策略问卷”作为基础,开发了一份提取学习障碍的问卷。在最初的版本中,“动机学习策略问卷”是为了测量学生的学习策略,但由于障碍维度部分来源于学习策略分类,我们选择了这个已经被验证过的问卷[2]。在这个迭代中,我们可以确定问卷的五因素结构,可以映射到设置学习障碍之前的五个维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards the construction of a questionnaire for the identification of learning obstacles
This paper deals with the identification of learning obstacles using the questionnaire method. Therefore, two iterations were proceeded: The first one was part of a survey that was carried out at four locations at universities of applied sciences. We asked students about obstructive facts in general providing items for five learning obstacle dimensions that were set up before; emotional/motivational, epistemological/cognitive, didactical, resource-related and meta-cognitive learning obstacle dimensions. After the general part, we asked them to answer the same question, but in relation to the — in their opinion — most difficult learning content. With this question, we aim to get indications regarding to epistemological obstacles. In a second step, we used the "Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire", which was developed by Pintrich [1] as a basis to develop a questionnaire that extracts learning obstacles. In its original version, the "Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire" was intended to measure students' learning strategies, but, as the obstacle dimensions were partly derived from learning strategy classification, we chose this already validated questionnaire [2]. Within this iteration, we could confirm a five-factor structure of the questionnaire that could be mapped to the five before set learning obstacle dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信