欧盟新反倾销方法与非市场经济争端的终结?

S. Noël, Weihuan Zhou
{"title":"欧盟新反倾销方法与非市场经济争端的终结?","authors":"S. Noël, Weihuan Zhou","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The EU’s New Anti-Dumping (‘AD’) Methodology effectively maintains the long-standing distinction between market economies and non-market economies (‘NMEs’) and continues the entrenched practice of treating China discriminatively in AD actions. China challenged this discriminatory treatment immediately after the expiry of the relevant parts of section 15 of its World Trade Organization (WTO) Accession Protocol which permits such practices purportedly for fifteen years only. For unknown reasons, China decided to suspend the panel proceedings before the panel report was about to be released. While the suspension means that WTO Members including the EU may continue their existing AD practices against China, it would not stop China from retaliating against such discriminatory treatment. More significantly, the suspension does not mean the end of the dispute as China is likely to pursue it once the appellate function of the WTO is revived.","PeriodicalId":426783,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EU’s New Anti-dumping Methodology and The End of The Non-Market Economy Dispute?\",\"authors\":\"S. Noël, Weihuan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gtcj2019048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The EU’s New Anti-Dumping (‘AD’) Methodology effectively maintains the long-standing distinction between market economies and non-market economies (‘NMEs’) and continues the entrenched practice of treating China discriminatively in AD actions. China challenged this discriminatory treatment immediately after the expiry of the relevant parts of section 15 of its World Trade Organization (WTO) Accession Protocol which permits such practices purportedly for fifteen years only. For unknown reasons, China decided to suspend the panel proceedings before the panel report was about to be released. While the suspension means that WTO Members including the EU may continue their existing AD practices against China, it would not stop China from retaliating against such discriminatory treatment. More significantly, the suspension does not mean the end of the dispute as China is likely to pursue it once the appellate function of the WTO is revived.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2019048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2019048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

欧盟的新反倾销(“AD”)方法有效地维持了市场经济与非市场经济(“NMEs”)之间长期存在的区别,并继续在反倾销行动中歧视中国的根深蒂固的做法。中国在其《加入世界贸易组织议定书》第15条有关部分期满后立即对这种歧视性待遇提出质疑,该条款据称只允许这种做法15年。由于不明原因,中国在专家组报告即将发布前决定暂停专家组程序。虽然这意味着包括欧盟在内的世贸组织成员可以继续对中国实施现有的反倾销措施,但这不会阻止中国对这种歧视性待遇进行报复。更重要的是,一旦WTO上诉功能恢复,中国很有可能继续进行上诉,因此,这并不意味着争端的结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EU’s New Anti-dumping Methodology and The End of The Non-Market Economy Dispute?
The EU’s New Anti-Dumping (‘AD’) Methodology effectively maintains the long-standing distinction between market economies and non-market economies (‘NMEs’) and continues the entrenched practice of treating China discriminatively in AD actions. China challenged this discriminatory treatment immediately after the expiry of the relevant parts of section 15 of its World Trade Organization (WTO) Accession Protocol which permits such practices purportedly for fifteen years only. For unknown reasons, China decided to suspend the panel proceedings before the panel report was about to be released. While the suspension means that WTO Members including the EU may continue their existing AD practices against China, it would not stop China from retaliating against such discriminatory treatment. More significantly, the suspension does not mean the end of the dispute as China is likely to pursue it once the appellate function of the WTO is revived.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信