干预措施,以减少苯二氮卓类药物和镇静催眠药物的使用在急症护理医院:范围审查。

Heather L Neville, Courtney Granter, Pegah Adibi, J. Belliveau, J. Isenor, S. Bowles
{"title":"干预措施,以减少苯二氮卓类药物和镇静催眠药物的使用在急症护理医院:范围审查。","authors":"Heather L Neville, Courtney Granter, Pegah Adibi, J. Belliveau, J. Isenor, S. Bowles","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-88543/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nBenzodiazepines and sedative-hypnotic drugs (BZD/SHD) are commonly utilized in the acute care setting for insomnia and anxiety and are associated with cognitive impairment, falls, and fractures. Interventions to reduce use of BZD/SHD in hospitals are not well characterized.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe objective was to conduct a scoping review to identify and characterize interventions to reduce the use of BZD/SHD by adults in the acute care setting.\n\n\nMETHODS\nEnglish language studies and abstracts that described an intervention to reduce BZD/SHD in adult hospital patients were included. Six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched up to July 2018 and updated to February 3, 2021. The grey literature (Opengrey, Grey Matters, Google Advanced) was searched up to July 2018. Titles and abstracts were screened and full-text articles were reviewed and charted by three independent reviewers. Stakeholders were consulted to inform the scoping review and collect perspectives on the findings.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere were 13,046 records identified and 43 studies included. The most common study designs were uncontrolled before and after (23/43, 53.5%) and randomized controlled trials (7/43, 16.3%). The majority of studies tested a single intervention (32/43, 74.4%) such as education, deprescribing, relaxation training and sleep protocols. Patients were frequently the target of relaxation training and behavior change interventions; while sleep protocols, multifaceted interventions, education and deprescribing were usually directed at healthcare providers, either alone or in combination with patients. Most studies reported positive results in decreasing BZD/SHD use (27/43, 62.8%).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe scoping review found a variety of interventions to decrease the utilization of BZD/SHD in hospitals. Multifaceted interventions aimed at patients and healthcare providers that include a combination of education, sleep protocols, and deprescribing may support reductions in BZD/SHD use. Stakeholders also recommended policy and system changes such as computer alerts due to feasibility and workload.","PeriodicalId":187352,"journal":{"name":"Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to reduce benzodiazepine and sedative-hypnotic drug use in acute care hospitals: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Heather L Neville, Courtney Granter, Pegah Adibi, J. Belliveau, J. Isenor, S. Bowles\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-88543/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nBenzodiazepines and sedative-hypnotic drugs (BZD/SHD) are commonly utilized in the acute care setting for insomnia and anxiety and are associated with cognitive impairment, falls, and fractures. Interventions to reduce use of BZD/SHD in hospitals are not well characterized.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nThe objective was to conduct a scoping review to identify and characterize interventions to reduce the use of BZD/SHD by adults in the acute care setting.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nEnglish language studies and abstracts that described an intervention to reduce BZD/SHD in adult hospital patients were included. Six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched up to July 2018 and updated to February 3, 2021. The grey literature (Opengrey, Grey Matters, Google Advanced) was searched up to July 2018. Titles and abstracts were screened and full-text articles were reviewed and charted by three independent reviewers. Stakeholders were consulted to inform the scoping review and collect perspectives on the findings.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThere were 13,046 records identified and 43 studies included. The most common study designs were uncontrolled before and after (23/43, 53.5%) and randomized controlled trials (7/43, 16.3%). The majority of studies tested a single intervention (32/43, 74.4%) such as education, deprescribing, relaxation training and sleep protocols. Patients were frequently the target of relaxation training and behavior change interventions; while sleep protocols, multifaceted interventions, education and deprescribing were usually directed at healthcare providers, either alone or in combination with patients. Most studies reported positive results in decreasing BZD/SHD use (27/43, 62.8%).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe scoping review found a variety of interventions to decrease the utilization of BZD/SHD in hospitals. Multifaceted interventions aimed at patients and healthcare providers that include a combination of education, sleep protocols, and deprescribing may support reductions in BZD/SHD use. Stakeholders also recommended policy and system changes such as computer alerts due to feasibility and workload.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-88543/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-88543/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:苯二氮卓类药物和镇静催眠药物(BZD/SHD)通常用于失眠和焦虑的急性护理环境,并与认知障碍、跌倒和骨折有关。在医院减少BZD/SHD使用的干预措施没有很好地描述。目的:目的是进行范围审查,以确定和表征干预措施,以减少急性护理环境中成人BZD/SHD的使用。方法纳入描述降低成人医院患者BZD/SHD干预措施的英文研究和摘要。六个数据库(PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus和Web of Science)被检索到2018年7月,并更新到2021年2月3日。灰色文献(Opengrey, grey Matters, Google Advanced)被搜索到2018年7月。题目和摘要经过筛选,全文文章由三名独立审稿人审阅和绘制图表。咨询了利益相关者,为范围审查提供信息,并收集了对调查结果的看法。结果共纳入13046份记录和43项研究。最常见的研究设计是前后无对照试验(23/43,53.5%)和随机对照试验(7/43,16.3%)。大多数研究测试了单一干预(32/43,74.4%),如教育、处方、放松训练和睡眠协议。患者经常成为放松训练和行为改变干预的目标;而睡眠协议、多方面干预、教育和处方处方通常是针对医疗保健提供者的,要么单独实施,要么与患者联合实施。大多数研究报告了BZD/SHD使用减少的积极结果(27/43,62.8%)。结论本研究发现多种干预措施可降低BZD/SHD在医院的使用率。针对患者和医疗保健提供者的多方面干预措施,包括教育、睡眠协议和处方处方的结合,可能有助于减少BZD/SHD的使用。由于可行性和工作量,利益相关者还建议进行政策和系统更改,例如计算机警报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions to reduce benzodiazepine and sedative-hypnotic drug use in acute care hospitals: A scoping review.
BACKGROUND Benzodiazepines and sedative-hypnotic drugs (BZD/SHD) are commonly utilized in the acute care setting for insomnia and anxiety and are associated with cognitive impairment, falls, and fractures. Interventions to reduce use of BZD/SHD in hospitals are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE The objective was to conduct a scoping review to identify and characterize interventions to reduce the use of BZD/SHD by adults in the acute care setting. METHODS English language studies and abstracts that described an intervention to reduce BZD/SHD in adult hospital patients were included. Six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched up to July 2018 and updated to February 3, 2021. The grey literature (Opengrey, Grey Matters, Google Advanced) was searched up to July 2018. Titles and abstracts were screened and full-text articles were reviewed and charted by three independent reviewers. Stakeholders were consulted to inform the scoping review and collect perspectives on the findings. RESULTS There were 13,046 records identified and 43 studies included. The most common study designs were uncontrolled before and after (23/43, 53.5%) and randomized controlled trials (7/43, 16.3%). The majority of studies tested a single intervention (32/43, 74.4%) such as education, deprescribing, relaxation training and sleep protocols. Patients were frequently the target of relaxation training and behavior change interventions; while sleep protocols, multifaceted interventions, education and deprescribing were usually directed at healthcare providers, either alone or in combination with patients. Most studies reported positive results in decreasing BZD/SHD use (27/43, 62.8%). CONCLUSIONS The scoping review found a variety of interventions to decrease the utilization of BZD/SHD in hospitals. Multifaceted interventions aimed at patients and healthcare providers that include a combination of education, sleep protocols, and deprescribing may support reductions in BZD/SHD use. Stakeholders also recommended policy and system changes such as computer alerts due to feasibility and workload.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信