油画反应情绪识别的艺术专长差异研究

Yu-Ting Lan, Ze-Chen Li, Dan Peng, Wei-Long Zheng, Bao-Liang Lu
{"title":"油画反应情绪识别的艺术专长差异研究","authors":"Yu-Ting Lan, Ze-Chen Li, Dan Peng, Wei-Long Zheng, Bao-Liang Lu","doi":"10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have been conducted on building emotion recognition frameworks and enhancing their performances using Electroencephalography (EEG) and eye tracking signals. However, the differences between experts in art and non-experts in emotion recognition still remain to be elucidated. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the performance of various computational models for emotion recognition in response to oil paintings and identify the differences between experts in art and non-experts. The experimental results demonstrate that Transformer neural networks achieve the highest accuracies of 65.27% in three-category emotion recognition (negative, neutral, and positive) in response to oil paintings. Although the overall emotion recognition accuracies of the two groups are similar, the mean accuracy of the non-expert group for positive emotion is higher than that of experts, and the expert group has higher recognition accuracy in neutral emotion than the non-expert group. We further investigate the neural patterns of the three emotions in the two groups. The experimental results indicate that neural pattern differences do exist in both emotions and artistic expertise. The parietal and occipital lobes are more activated for positive emotion in the artistic expert group in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands. Our proposed methods provide an understanding of underlying emotion-expertise neurological mechanisms and cognitive processes.","PeriodicalId":201841,"journal":{"name":"2023 11th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Artistic Expertise Difference in Emotion Recognition in Response to Oil Paintings\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Ting Lan, Ze-Chen Li, Dan Peng, Wei-Long Zheng, Bao-Liang Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous studies have been conducted on building emotion recognition frameworks and enhancing their performances using Electroencephalography (EEG) and eye tracking signals. However, the differences between experts in art and non-experts in emotion recognition still remain to be elucidated. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the performance of various computational models for emotion recognition in response to oil paintings and identify the differences between experts in art and non-experts. The experimental results demonstrate that Transformer neural networks achieve the highest accuracies of 65.27% in three-category emotion recognition (negative, neutral, and positive) in response to oil paintings. Although the overall emotion recognition accuracies of the two groups are similar, the mean accuracy of the non-expert group for positive emotion is higher than that of experts, and the expert group has higher recognition accuracy in neutral emotion than the non-expert group. We further investigate the neural patterns of the three emotions in the two groups. The experimental results indicate that neural pattern differences do exist in both emotions and artistic expertise. The parietal and occipital lobes are more activated for positive emotion in the artistic expert group in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands. Our proposed methods provide an understanding of underlying emotion-expertise neurological mechanisms and cognitive processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 11th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 11th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 11th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已有研究利用脑电图(EEG)和眼动追踪信号构建情绪识别框架并增强其性能。然而,艺术专家和非专家在情感识别方面的差异仍然有待阐明。在本文中,我们系统地评估了各种计算模型对油画情感识别的表现,并确定了艺术专家和非专家之间的差异。实验结果表明,Transformer神经网络对油画的消极、中性和积极三种情绪识别准确率最高,达到65.27%。虽然两组的整体情绪识别准确率相近,但非专家组对积极情绪的平均识别准确率高于专家,而专家对中性情绪的识别准确率高于非专家组。我们进一步研究了两组中三种情绪的神经模式。实验结果表明,在情绪和艺术专长方面确实存在神经模式差异。艺术专家组的顶叶和枕叶在α、β和γ波段的积极情绪中更活跃。我们提出的方法提供了对潜在的情绪-专业知识,神经机制和认知过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Artistic Expertise Difference in Emotion Recognition in Response to Oil Paintings
Previous studies have been conducted on building emotion recognition frameworks and enhancing their performances using Electroencephalography (EEG) and eye tracking signals. However, the differences between experts in art and non-experts in emotion recognition still remain to be elucidated. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the performance of various computational models for emotion recognition in response to oil paintings and identify the differences between experts in art and non-experts. The experimental results demonstrate that Transformer neural networks achieve the highest accuracies of 65.27% in three-category emotion recognition (negative, neutral, and positive) in response to oil paintings. Although the overall emotion recognition accuracies of the two groups are similar, the mean accuracy of the non-expert group for positive emotion is higher than that of experts, and the expert group has higher recognition accuracy in neutral emotion than the non-expert group. We further investigate the neural patterns of the three emotions in the two groups. The experimental results indicate that neural pattern differences do exist in both emotions and artistic expertise. The parietal and occipital lobes are more activated for positive emotion in the artistic expert group in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands. Our proposed methods provide an understanding of underlying emotion-expertise neurological mechanisms and cognitive processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信