诚实与逆向选择

Michael T. Rauh, Giulio Seccia
{"title":"诚实与逆向选择","authors":"Michael T. Rauh, Giulio Seccia","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2426214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is substantial evidence that generalized trust improves economic outcomes at both the individual and aggregate levels. Furthermore, certain institutions such as educational and religious institutions foster trust, trade, and economic growth. A specific mechanism through which trust might operate is honest communication. We consider the problem of a parent who can enroll her child in an institution which can make her child honest with probability less than one. We assume that whether the child is honest or not is the private information of the child but that institutional membership is observable so that institutions can serve as both imperfect socialization technologies and potentially informative signals of honesty. We consider the two main benchmark adverse selection models in the literature: the screening model and a game-theoretic version of the market for lemons. We provide conditions under which market institutions provide explicit monetary incentives for socialization. When socialization occurs in equilibrium it improves allocative efficiency in the screening model and reduces adverse selection in the market for lemons.","PeriodicalId":412480,"journal":{"name":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Honesty and Adverse Selection\",\"authors\":\"Michael T. Rauh, Giulio Seccia\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2426214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is substantial evidence that generalized trust improves economic outcomes at both the individual and aggregate levels. Furthermore, certain institutions such as educational and religious institutions foster trust, trade, and economic growth. A specific mechanism through which trust might operate is honest communication. We consider the problem of a parent who can enroll her child in an institution which can make her child honest with probability less than one. We assume that whether the child is honest or not is the private information of the child but that institutional membership is observable so that institutions can serve as both imperfect socialization technologies and potentially informative signals of honesty. We consider the two main benchmark adverse selection models in the literature: the screening model and a game-theoretic version of the market for lemons. We provide conditions under which market institutions provide explicit monetary incentives for socialization. When socialization occurs in equilibrium it improves allocative efficiency in the screening model and reduces adverse selection in the market for lemons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2426214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2426214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有大量证据表明,广义信任在个人和总体水平上都能改善经济结果。此外,某些机构,如教育和宗教机构,促进信任、贸易和经济增长。信任运作的一个具体机制是诚实的沟通。我们考虑这样一个问题:一位家长可以让她的孩子进入一个使她的孩子诚实的概率小于1的机构。我们假设孩子是否诚实是孩子的私人信息,但机构成员是可以观察到的,因此机构既可以作为不完善的社会化技术,也可以作为诚实的潜在信息信号。我们考虑了文献中两个主要的基准逆向选择模型:筛选模型和柠檬市场的博弈论版本。我们提供条件,让市场机构为社会化提供明确的货币激励。当社会化发生在均衡状态时,它提高了筛选模型的配置效率,减少了柠檬市场的逆向选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Honesty and Adverse Selection
There is substantial evidence that generalized trust improves economic outcomes at both the individual and aggregate levels. Furthermore, certain institutions such as educational and religious institutions foster trust, trade, and economic growth. A specific mechanism through which trust might operate is honest communication. We consider the problem of a parent who can enroll her child in an institution which can make her child honest with probability less than one. We assume that whether the child is honest or not is the private information of the child but that institutional membership is observable so that institutions can serve as both imperfect socialization technologies and potentially informative signals of honesty. We consider the two main benchmark adverse selection models in the literature: the screening model and a game-theoretic version of the market for lemons. We provide conditions under which market institutions provide explicit monetary incentives for socialization. When socialization occurs in equilibrium it improves allocative efficiency in the screening model and reduces adverse selection in the market for lemons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信