分散投资是否会导致“分散投资折扣”?

Belén Villalonga
{"title":"分散投资是否会导致“分散投资折扣”?","authors":"Belén Villalonga","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.227828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using recent econometric developments about causal inference, I examine whether diversification destroys value. I estimate the value effect of diversification by matching diversifying and single-segment firms on their propensity score––the predicted values from a probit model of the propensity to diversify. I also use Heckman’s (1979) two-stage estimator for comparison purposes. I find that on average, diversification does not destroy value. This finding is robust to the choice of estimator, sample, measures of excess value, and specification.","PeriodicalId":272257,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"835","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Diversification Cause the 'Diversification Discount'?\",\"authors\":\"Belén Villalonga\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.227828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using recent econometric developments about causal inference, I examine whether diversification destroys value. I estimate the value effect of diversification by matching diversifying and single-segment firms on their propensity score––the predicted values from a probit model of the propensity to diversify. I also use Heckman’s (1979) two-stage estimator for comparison purposes. I find that on average, diversification does not destroy value. This finding is robust to the choice of estimator, sample, measures of excess value, and specification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"835\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.227828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance and Organizations eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.227828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 835

摘要

利用最近关于因果推理的计量经济学发展,我研究了多元化是否会破坏价值。我通过匹配多元化公司和单部门公司的倾向得分来估计多元化的价值效应——倾向得分是多元化倾向的probit模型的预测值。我还使用Heckman(1979)的两阶段估计器进行比较。我发现,平均而言,多元化并不会破坏价值。这一发现对于估计量、样本、超额值度量和规格的选择是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Diversification Cause the 'Diversification Discount'?
Using recent econometric developments about causal inference, I examine whether diversification destroys value. I estimate the value effect of diversification by matching diversifying and single-segment firms on their propensity score––the predicted values from a probit model of the propensity to diversify. I also use Heckman’s (1979) two-stage estimator for comparison purposes. I find that on average, diversification does not destroy value. This finding is robust to the choice of estimator, sample, measures of excess value, and specification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信