精益建筑与LEED认证:系统文献综述

Leonardo do Nascimento Melo, Andreza Kalbusch, Carla Roberta Ferreira, L. R. Leite
{"title":"精益建筑与LEED认证:系统文献综述","authors":"Leonardo do Nascimento Melo, Andreza Kalbusch, Carla Roberta Ferreira, L. R. Leite","doi":"10.29183/2596-237x.ensus2023.v11.n1.p153-161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing population directly impacts waste generation and, consequently, the environment. In this context, Lean-Green practice emerges from the connection between lean construction practices and sustainable concepts in certification programs in an attempt to implement the efficient use of available resources. Thus, this study aims to understand the relationship between Lean Construction (LC) and LEED certification. A systematic literature review was carried out on EBSCO, Scopus and Web of Science databases. In total, 30 articles were identified initially, but only 12 were selected for critical reading and analysis. As a result, the main synergy between both approaches were the existing relationships between principles of the construction system and certification categories were identified. Regarding benefits, we identified: improvements in management at the construction site and cost reduction and improvement in logistics of materials. Differences were also identified in final objective of each approach - LEED certification focuses on sustainability whilst LC on reducing costs and waste in the execution of the work; this difference is seen as a barrier to the connection between the studied approaches.","PeriodicalId":115879,"journal":{"name":"ENSUS2023 - XI Encontro de Sustentabilidade em Projeto","volume":"93 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lean Construction and LEED certification: a systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo do Nascimento Melo, Andreza Kalbusch, Carla Roberta Ferreira, L. R. Leite\",\"doi\":\"10.29183/2596-237x.ensus2023.v11.n1.p153-161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The growing population directly impacts waste generation and, consequently, the environment. In this context, Lean-Green practice emerges from the connection between lean construction practices and sustainable concepts in certification programs in an attempt to implement the efficient use of available resources. Thus, this study aims to understand the relationship between Lean Construction (LC) and LEED certification. A systematic literature review was carried out on EBSCO, Scopus and Web of Science databases. In total, 30 articles were identified initially, but only 12 were selected for critical reading and analysis. As a result, the main synergy between both approaches were the existing relationships between principles of the construction system and certification categories were identified. Regarding benefits, we identified: improvements in management at the construction site and cost reduction and improvement in logistics of materials. Differences were also identified in final objective of each approach - LEED certification focuses on sustainability whilst LC on reducing costs and waste in the execution of the work; this difference is seen as a barrier to the connection between the studied approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENSUS2023 - XI Encontro de Sustentabilidade em Projeto\",\"volume\":\"93 8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENSUS2023 - XI Encontro de Sustentabilidade em Projeto\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29183/2596-237x.ensus2023.v11.n1.p153-161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENSUS2023 - XI Encontro de Sustentabilidade em Projeto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29183/2596-237x.ensus2023.v11.n1.p153-161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不断增长的人口直接影响废物的产生,从而影响环境。在这种背景下,精益绿色实践从精益建筑实践和认证计划中的可持续概念之间的联系中出现,试图实现有效利用可用资源。因此,本研究旨在了解精益建筑(LC)与LEED认证之间的关系。对EBSCO、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行了系统的文献综述。最初总共确定了30篇文章,但只有12篇被选中进行批判性阅读和分析。因此,两种方法之间的主要协同作用是确定了建筑系统原则和认证类别之间的现有关系。在效益方面,我们发现:改善了施工现场的管理,降低了成本,改善了材料的物流。每种方法的最终目标也存在差异——LEED认证侧重于可持续性,而LC则侧重于减少工作执行中的成本和浪费;这种差异被视为研究方法之间联系的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lean Construction and LEED certification: a systematic literature review
The growing population directly impacts waste generation and, consequently, the environment. In this context, Lean-Green practice emerges from the connection between lean construction practices and sustainable concepts in certification programs in an attempt to implement the efficient use of available resources. Thus, this study aims to understand the relationship between Lean Construction (LC) and LEED certification. A systematic literature review was carried out on EBSCO, Scopus and Web of Science databases. In total, 30 articles were identified initially, but only 12 were selected for critical reading and analysis. As a result, the main synergy between both approaches were the existing relationships between principles of the construction system and certification categories were identified. Regarding benefits, we identified: improvements in management at the construction site and cost reduction and improvement in logistics of materials. Differences were also identified in final objective of each approach - LEED certification focuses on sustainability whilst LC on reducing costs and waste in the execution of the work; this difference is seen as a barrier to the connection between the studied approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信