{"title":"Hétérotopies佣人","authors":"Nella Arambašin","doi":"10.38003/ccsr.3.5-6.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In applying the notion of heterotopia to domesticity this paper aims to historicize, from the 19th century to today, the vanishing points imagined by those who maintain the interiors where they are assigned to those “good to do everything,” such as nannies and housewives. The inner frame then opens like an Alberti’s window to narrative perspectives which, according to historical configurations, articulate private and public spaces, as well as urban and rural, bourgeois and popular, and national and foreign, to designate counter-spaces of domesticity: the café, ball, square, multimedia installation, beach, and flight. To access the paradoxical nature of these “located utopias,” both hindered and half-open to freedom, it is necessary to use the writers (Octave Mirbeau, Marguerite Duras, Léïla Slimani, Aldous Huxley), artists (Edouard Manet, Lucien Simon, Richard Hamilton, Birgit Jürgenssen), as well as filmmakers (Benoît Jacquot, Alfonso Cuarón). They lay the groundwork for a deconstruction of the matrimonial norm, from which feminine vanishing points radiate, produced by the stereotypes of the servant-whore, the good Bécassine or the housewife, in order to try to thwart them and free themselves from them.","PeriodicalId":233649,"journal":{"name":"Cross-cultural studies review","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hétérotopies domestiques\",\"authors\":\"Nella Arambašin\",\"doi\":\"10.38003/ccsr.3.5-6.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In applying the notion of heterotopia to domesticity this paper aims to historicize, from the 19th century to today, the vanishing points imagined by those who maintain the interiors where they are assigned to those “good to do everything,” such as nannies and housewives. The inner frame then opens like an Alberti’s window to narrative perspectives which, according to historical configurations, articulate private and public spaces, as well as urban and rural, bourgeois and popular, and national and foreign, to designate counter-spaces of domesticity: the café, ball, square, multimedia installation, beach, and flight. To access the paradoxical nature of these “located utopias,” both hindered and half-open to freedom, it is necessary to use the writers (Octave Mirbeau, Marguerite Duras, Léïla Slimani, Aldous Huxley), artists (Edouard Manet, Lucien Simon, Richard Hamilton, Birgit Jürgenssen), as well as filmmakers (Benoît Jacquot, Alfonso Cuarón). They lay the groundwork for a deconstruction of the matrimonial norm, from which feminine vanishing points radiate, produced by the stereotypes of the servant-whore, the good Bécassine or the housewife, in order to try to thwart them and free themselves from them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cross-cultural studies review\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cross-cultural studies review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38003/ccsr.3.5-6.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross-cultural studies review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38003/ccsr.3.5-6.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在将异托邦的概念应用于家庭生活中,本文旨在将从19世纪到今天,那些维持内心世界的人所想象的消失点历史化,在那里他们被分配给那些“做任何事都很好”的人,比如保姆和家庭主妇。然后,内部框架像阿尔伯蒂的窗户一样打开,叙事视角根据历史配置,清晰地表达私人和公共空间,城市和农村,资产阶级和大众,民族和外国,指定家庭生活的对抗空间:咖啡馆,舞会,广场,多媒体装置,海滩和飞行。为了接近这些“定位乌托邦”的矛盾本质,既阻碍又半开放的自由,有必要使用作家(Octave Mirbeau, Marguerite Duras, Léïla Slimani, Aldous Huxley),艺术家(Edouard Manet, Lucien Simon, Richard Hamilton, Birgit jrgenssen),以及电影制作人(benot Jacquot, Alfonso Cuarón)。她们为解构婚姻规范奠定了基础,从婚姻规范中散发出女性消失点,这些消失点是由男妓、优秀的bassacassine或家庭主妇的刻板印象产生的,目的是试图挫败它们,使自己摆脱它们。
In applying the notion of heterotopia to domesticity this paper aims to historicize, from the 19th century to today, the vanishing points imagined by those who maintain the interiors where they are assigned to those “good to do everything,” such as nannies and housewives. The inner frame then opens like an Alberti’s window to narrative perspectives which, according to historical configurations, articulate private and public spaces, as well as urban and rural, bourgeois and popular, and national and foreign, to designate counter-spaces of domesticity: the café, ball, square, multimedia installation, beach, and flight. To access the paradoxical nature of these “located utopias,” both hindered and half-open to freedom, it is necessary to use the writers (Octave Mirbeau, Marguerite Duras, Léïla Slimani, Aldous Huxley), artists (Edouard Manet, Lucien Simon, Richard Hamilton, Birgit Jürgenssen), as well as filmmakers (Benoît Jacquot, Alfonso Cuarón). They lay the groundwork for a deconstruction of the matrimonial norm, from which feminine vanishing points radiate, produced by the stereotypes of the servant-whore, the good Bécassine or the housewife, in order to try to thwart them and free themselves from them.