多分量易损性曲线中地震相关系数的组合方法

Jung Han 김정한Kim, Si Young 김시영Kim, In-Kil 최인길Choi
{"title":"多分量易损性曲线中地震相关系数的组合方法","authors":"Jung Han 김정한Kim, Si Young 김시영Kim, In-Kil 최인길Choi","doi":"10.5000/eesk.2020.24.3.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the important safety system, two or more units of identical equipment or redundant components with similar function were installed to prevent abnormal failure. If the failure probability of such equipment is independent, this redundancy could increase the system safety remarkably. However, if the failure of each component is highly correlated by installing in a structure or experiencing an earthquake event, the expected redundancy effect will decrease. Therefore, the seismic correlation of the equipment should be evaluated quantitatively for the seismic probabilistic safety assessment. The correlation effect can be explained in the procedure of constructing fragility curves. In this study, several methodologies to quantify the seismic correlation in the failure probability calculation for multiple components were reviewed and two possible ways considering the realistic situation were selected. Simple examples were tested to check the applicability of these methods. The conversion method between these two methods was suggested to render the evaluation using the advantages of each method possible.","PeriodicalId":372168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination Procedure for Seismic Correlation Coefficient in Fragility Curves of Multiple Components\",\"authors\":\"Jung Han 김정한Kim, Si Young 김시영Kim, In-Kil 최인길Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.5000/eesk.2020.24.3.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the important safety system, two or more units of identical equipment or redundant components with similar function were installed to prevent abnormal failure. If the failure probability of such equipment is independent, this redundancy could increase the system safety remarkably. However, if the failure of each component is highly correlated by installing in a structure or experiencing an earthquake event, the expected redundancy effect will decrease. Therefore, the seismic correlation of the equipment should be evaluated quantitatively for the seismic probabilistic safety assessment. The correlation effect can be explained in the procedure of constructing fragility curves. In this study, several methodologies to quantify the seismic correlation in the failure probability calculation for multiple components were reviewed and two possible ways considering the realistic situation were selected. Simple examples were tested to check the applicability of these methods. The conversion method between these two methods was suggested to render the evaluation using the advantages of each method possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5000/eesk.2020.24.3.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5000/eesk.2020.24.3.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

对于重要的安全系统,安装两个或两个以上的相同设备或功能相似的冗余部件,以防止异常故障。如果这些设备的故障概率是独立的,这种冗余可以显著提高系统的安全性。然而,如果每个部件的失效与安装在结构中或经历地震事件高度相关,则预期的冗余效应将降低。因此,在进行地震概率安全评价时,应定量评价设备的地震相关性。相关效应可以在构造脆性曲线的过程中加以解释。本文综述了在多构件失效概率计算中量化地震相关性的几种方法,并根据实际情况选择了两种可能的方法。通过简单的算例验证了这些方法的适用性。提出了两种方法之间的转换方法,使评价能够充分利用每种方法的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination Procedure for Seismic Correlation Coefficient in Fragility Curves of Multiple Components
For the important safety system, two or more units of identical equipment or redundant components with similar function were installed to prevent abnormal failure. If the failure probability of such equipment is independent, this redundancy could increase the system safety remarkably. However, if the failure of each component is highly correlated by installing in a structure or experiencing an earthquake event, the expected redundancy effect will decrease. Therefore, the seismic correlation of the equipment should be evaluated quantitatively for the seismic probabilistic safety assessment. The correlation effect can be explained in the procedure of constructing fragility curves. In this study, several methodologies to quantify the seismic correlation in the failure probability calculation for multiple components were reviewed and two possible ways considering the realistic situation were selected. Simple examples were tested to check the applicability of these methods. The conversion method between these two methods was suggested to render the evaluation using the advantages of each method possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信