{"title":"一种降低欺骗虹膜码误接受率的两阶段方法","authors":"Kelvin S. Bryant, G. Dozier","doi":"10.1145/1900008.1900048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we demonstrate how to reduce the chance of a spoofed iris code being falsely accepted by an iris recognition system. We simulate the system attack by taking one of the registered iris codes from a subject set and mutating it by several different rates and presenting the resultant iris codes to our system. Our approach uses the k-nearest neighbors from a training set to the known spoof to establish a critical distance. Presented iris codes from our mutant set that have a Hamming Ratio when compared to the spoof that is less than the critical distance are rejected. Those that are falsely accepted are totaled to produce a Spoof False Accept Rate (SP-FAR). The second phase of our approach uses traditional iris code recognition to reduce the SP-FAR by rejecting those spoofs that were mutated to a degree such that they will not match any of the other iris codes in the training set.","PeriodicalId":333104,"journal":{"name":"ACM SE '10","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A two-phased approach to reducing the false accept rate of spoofed iris codes\",\"authors\":\"Kelvin S. Bryant, G. Dozier\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1900008.1900048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we demonstrate how to reduce the chance of a spoofed iris code being falsely accepted by an iris recognition system. We simulate the system attack by taking one of the registered iris codes from a subject set and mutating it by several different rates and presenting the resultant iris codes to our system. Our approach uses the k-nearest neighbors from a training set to the known spoof to establish a critical distance. Presented iris codes from our mutant set that have a Hamming Ratio when compared to the spoof that is less than the critical distance are rejected. Those that are falsely accepted are totaled to produce a Spoof False Accept Rate (SP-FAR). The second phase of our approach uses traditional iris code recognition to reduce the SP-FAR by rejecting those spoofs that were mutated to a degree such that they will not match any of the other iris codes in the training set.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SE '10\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SE '10\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1900008.1900048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SE '10","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1900008.1900048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A two-phased approach to reducing the false accept rate of spoofed iris codes
In this paper, we demonstrate how to reduce the chance of a spoofed iris code being falsely accepted by an iris recognition system. We simulate the system attack by taking one of the registered iris codes from a subject set and mutating it by several different rates and presenting the resultant iris codes to our system. Our approach uses the k-nearest neighbors from a training set to the known spoof to establish a critical distance. Presented iris codes from our mutant set that have a Hamming Ratio when compared to the spoof that is less than the critical distance are rejected. Those that are falsely accepted are totaled to produce a Spoof False Accept Rate (SP-FAR). The second phase of our approach uses traditional iris code recognition to reduce the SP-FAR by rejecting those spoofs that were mutated to a degree such that they will not match any of the other iris codes in the training set.