统一定价作为进入壁垒

Hong Feng, Youping Li, Jie Shuai
{"title":"统一定价作为进入壁垒","authors":"Hong Feng, Youping Li, Jie Shuai","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3070750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers an entry game in which an incumbent firm operates in a number of markets and a potential entrant seeks to enter some or all of the markets. While price discrimination has usually been thought of as a barrier to entry, in our model it is not and, on the contrary, we find that charging a uniform price across the markets actually discourages entry. Partial entry occurs when the two firms’ products are highly substitutable. In this case, a ban on price discrimination raises the profits of both the incumbent and the entrant but reduces consumer and total welfare.","PeriodicalId":169574,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uniform Pricing as a Barrier to Entry\",\"authors\":\"Hong Feng, Youping Li, Jie Shuai\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3070750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers an entry game in which an incumbent firm operates in a number of markets and a potential entrant seeks to enter some or all of the markets. While price discrimination has usually been thought of as a barrier to entry, in our model it is not and, on the contrary, we find that charging a uniform price across the markets actually discourages entry. Partial entry occurs when the two firms’ products are highly substitutable. In this case, a ban on price discrimination raises the profits of both the incumbent and the entrant but reduces consumer and total welfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了一个进入博弈,在这个博弈中,既有企业在多个市场中运营,而潜在的进入者试图进入部分或全部市场。虽然价格歧视通常被认为是进入的障碍,但在我们的模型中并非如此,相反,我们发现在整个市场收取统一价格实际上阻碍了进入。当两家公司的产品具有高度可替代性时,就会出现部分进入。在这种情况下,禁止价格歧视提高了在位者和进入者的利润,但减少了消费者和总福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uniform Pricing as a Barrier to Entry
This paper considers an entry game in which an incumbent firm operates in a number of markets and a potential entrant seeks to enter some or all of the markets. While price discrimination has usually been thought of as a barrier to entry, in our model it is not and, on the contrary, we find that charging a uniform price across the markets actually discourages entry. Partial entry occurs when the two firms’ products are highly substitutable. In this case, a ban on price discrimination raises the profits of both the incumbent and the entrant but reduces consumer and total welfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信