{"title":"统一定价作为进入壁垒","authors":"Hong Feng, Youping Li, Jie Shuai","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3070750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers an entry game in which an incumbent firm operates in a number of markets and a potential entrant seeks to enter some or all of the markets. While price discrimination has usually been thought of as a barrier to entry, in our model it is not and, on the contrary, we find that charging a uniform price across the markets actually discourages entry. Partial entry occurs when the two firms’ products are highly substitutable. In this case, a ban on price discrimination raises the profits of both the incumbent and the entrant but reduces consumer and total welfare.","PeriodicalId":169574,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uniform Pricing as a Barrier to Entry\",\"authors\":\"Hong Feng, Youping Li, Jie Shuai\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3070750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers an entry game in which an incumbent firm operates in a number of markets and a potential entrant seeks to enter some or all of the markets. While price discrimination has usually been thought of as a barrier to entry, in our model it is not and, on the contrary, we find that charging a uniform price across the markets actually discourages entry. Partial entry occurs when the two firms’ products are highly substitutable. In this case, a ban on price discrimination raises the profits of both the incumbent and the entrant but reduces consumer and total welfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper considers an entry game in which an incumbent firm operates in a number of markets and a potential entrant seeks to enter some or all of the markets. While price discrimination has usually been thought of as a barrier to entry, in our model it is not and, on the contrary, we find that charging a uniform price across the markets actually discourages entry. Partial entry occurs when the two firms’ products are highly substitutable. In this case, a ban on price discrimination raises the profits of both the incumbent and the entrant but reduces consumer and total welfare.