在低收入和中等收入国家推行私人医疗保险的挑战:来自南非的经验教训

D. Mcintyre, H. McLeod
{"title":"在低收入和中等收入国家推行私人医疗保险的挑战:来自南非的经验教训","authors":"D. Mcintyre, H. McLeod","doi":"10.1017/9781139026468.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Africa’s apartheid history of legislated discrimination on the basis of race has left a legacy of massive income inequalities – with, at 0.63 in 2011, one of the highest Gini coefficients in the world (World Bank, 2017) – and inequalities in access to social services. It has also left an indelible imprint on the health sector, where private health insurance was developed to serve white workers, whereas the public health sector served the majority black population and lower-income whites.1 Since the first democratic elections in 1994, there has been considerable commitment to addressing these inequalities. However, progress has been limited: income inequalities have in fact been growing and inequalities within the health sector are increasingly related to class rather than race. The development of private health insurance, and policy related to it, has been heavily influenced by the social and political context. Medical schemes (the name given to private health insurance organizations in South Africa) were introduced at the turn of the 20th century, under British rule, for white mineworkers, and restricted to white South Africans until the 1970s. The number of schemes grew rapidly from the 1940s, alongside the growth of private providers. The apartheid government actively promoted privatization of health care financing and provision during the 1980s, deregulating medical schemes in 1988. Following transition to a democratic government in 1994, there were concerted efforts to re-regulate medical schemes, but in spite of","PeriodicalId":187387,"journal":{"name":"Private Health Insurance","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenges of pursuing private health insurance in low- and middle-income countries: lessons from South Africa\",\"authors\":\"D. Mcintyre, H. McLeod\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781139026468.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"South Africa’s apartheid history of legislated discrimination on the basis of race has left a legacy of massive income inequalities – with, at 0.63 in 2011, one of the highest Gini coefficients in the world (World Bank, 2017) – and inequalities in access to social services. It has also left an indelible imprint on the health sector, where private health insurance was developed to serve white workers, whereas the public health sector served the majority black population and lower-income whites.1 Since the first democratic elections in 1994, there has been considerable commitment to addressing these inequalities. However, progress has been limited: income inequalities have in fact been growing and inequalities within the health sector are increasingly related to class rather than race. The development of private health insurance, and policy related to it, has been heavily influenced by the social and political context. Medical schemes (the name given to private health insurance organizations in South Africa) were introduced at the turn of the 20th century, under British rule, for white mineworkers, and restricted to white South Africans until the 1970s. The number of schemes grew rapidly from the 1940s, alongside the growth of private providers. The apartheid government actively promoted privatization of health care financing and provision during the 1980s, deregulating medical schemes in 1988. Following transition to a democratic government in 1994, there were concerted efforts to re-regulate medical schemes, but in spite of\",\"PeriodicalId\":187387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Private Health Insurance\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Private Health Insurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139026468.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Private Health Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139026468.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

南非立法歧视种族的种族隔离历史留下了严重的收入不平等——2011年的基尼系数为0.63,是世界上基尼系数最高的国家之一(世界银行,2017年)——以及获得社会服务的不平等。它也给卫生部门留下了不可磨灭的印记,私营医疗保险是为白人工人服务的,而公共卫生部门是为大多数黑人和低收入白人服务的自1994年第一次民主选举以来,对解决这些不平等问题作出了相当大的承诺。然而,进展是有限的:收入不平等实际上一直在扩大,卫生部门内部的不平等越来越多地与阶级而非种族有关。私人医疗保险的发展及其相关政策深受社会和政治环境的影响。医疗计划(南非私人健康保险组织的名称)是在20世纪初英国统治下为白人矿工引入的,直到20世纪70年代才仅限于南非白人。自20世纪40年代以来,随着私人医疗服务提供者的增长,医疗计划的数量迅速增长。种族隔离政府在20世纪80年代积极推动医疗保健融资和提供的私有化,1988年解除了对医疗计划的管制。1994年向民主政府过渡后,各方齐心协力重新规范医疗计划,但尽管如此
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The challenges of pursuing private health insurance in low- and middle-income countries: lessons from South Africa
South Africa’s apartheid history of legislated discrimination on the basis of race has left a legacy of massive income inequalities – with, at 0.63 in 2011, one of the highest Gini coefficients in the world (World Bank, 2017) – and inequalities in access to social services. It has also left an indelible imprint on the health sector, where private health insurance was developed to serve white workers, whereas the public health sector served the majority black population and lower-income whites.1 Since the first democratic elections in 1994, there has been considerable commitment to addressing these inequalities. However, progress has been limited: income inequalities have in fact been growing and inequalities within the health sector are increasingly related to class rather than race. The development of private health insurance, and policy related to it, has been heavily influenced by the social and political context. Medical schemes (the name given to private health insurance organizations in South Africa) were introduced at the turn of the 20th century, under British rule, for white mineworkers, and restricted to white South Africans until the 1970s. The number of schemes grew rapidly from the 1940s, alongside the growth of private providers. The apartheid government actively promoted privatization of health care financing and provision during the 1980s, deregulating medical schemes in 1988. Following transition to a democratic government in 1994, there were concerted efforts to re-regulate medical schemes, but in spite of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信