货币财政对印尼经济的影响

Rio Kartika Supriyatna, Dedi Junaedi, Evinovita Evinovita
{"title":"货币财政对印尼经济的影响","authors":"Rio Kartika Supriyatna, Dedi Junaedi, Evinovita Evinovita","doi":"10.47467/alkharaj.v2i2.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study aims to: analyze whether monetary fiscal policy affects the economy (GDP) of Indonesia and examine whether differences in the budget regime affect the fiscal fiscal governance in supporting the achievement of Indonesia's GDP. Research using quantitative analysis methods; The data used are time series 1990-2010, the analysis technique used is multiple regression with dummy variables. The results show that monetary stability - represented by the variable APBN, financing, investment, BI-rate, exports, imports, inflation, exchange rates and budget regime differences - simultaneously significantly influences GDP development. The level of correlation between the independent variables and the variable variable is quite strong with R-squared 0.9969%. This means that the research variables can explain the dynamics of GDP around 99.69%, the effect is influenced by other variables not examined. Partially, from the results of the statistical analysis, it was found that the APBN, investment, BI-Rate, Imports and the exchange rate had an effect and the difference in the budget system regime had a significant effect on the development of GDP. While the variable financing, exports and inflation have no significant effect on GDP. Cost variables can have a real impact if the standard error is raised to 19%. Exports can significantly affect GDP if the standard error is raised to 24%. APBN, investment, BI-Rate and budget regime differences are positively correlated to GDP. While imports and the exchange rate are negatively correlated to GDP. The econometric model of the influence of oneter stability with GDP is as follows: GDP $ = 0.3131 * APBN + 1.8437 * INVEST $ + 7.8384 * BI_RATE - 0.00037 * IMPORT - 0.01226 * EXCHANGE $ + 167.02356 * REZIM1 + 181.1681 * REZIM2 + 197.6315. Relatively, the use of an integrated and performance-based budgeting system is better than a balanced budget system. Likewise the performance-based budgeting system is also relatively better than the integrated budgeting system. This means that the budget system reform in Indonesia has been on the right track so far.Keywords: Indonesia, economy, GDP, budget system, monetary stability","PeriodicalId":286012,"journal":{"name":"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENGARUH FISKAL MONETER TERHADAP PEREKONOMIAN INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Rio Kartika Supriyatna, Dedi Junaedi, Evinovita Evinovita\",\"doi\":\"10.47467/alkharaj.v2i2.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis study aims to: analyze whether monetary fiscal policy affects the economy (GDP) of Indonesia and examine whether differences in the budget regime affect the fiscal fiscal governance in supporting the achievement of Indonesia's GDP. Research using quantitative analysis methods; The data used are time series 1990-2010, the analysis technique used is multiple regression with dummy variables. The results show that monetary stability - represented by the variable APBN, financing, investment, BI-rate, exports, imports, inflation, exchange rates and budget regime differences - simultaneously significantly influences GDP development. The level of correlation between the independent variables and the variable variable is quite strong with R-squared 0.9969%. This means that the research variables can explain the dynamics of GDP around 99.69%, the effect is influenced by other variables not examined. Partially, from the results of the statistical analysis, it was found that the APBN, investment, BI-Rate, Imports and the exchange rate had an effect and the difference in the budget system regime had a significant effect on the development of GDP. While the variable financing, exports and inflation have no significant effect on GDP. Cost variables can have a real impact if the standard error is raised to 19%. Exports can significantly affect GDP if the standard error is raised to 24%. APBN, investment, BI-Rate and budget regime differences are positively correlated to GDP. While imports and the exchange rate are negatively correlated to GDP. The econometric model of the influence of oneter stability with GDP is as follows: GDP $ = 0.3131 * APBN + 1.8437 * INVEST $ + 7.8384 * BI_RATE - 0.00037 * IMPORT - 0.01226 * EXCHANGE $ + 167.02356 * REZIM1 + 181.1681 * REZIM2 + 197.6315. Relatively, the use of an integrated and performance-based budgeting system is better than a balanced budget system. Likewise the performance-based budgeting system is also relatively better than the integrated budgeting system. This means that the budget system reform in Indonesia has been on the right track so far.Keywords: Indonesia, economy, GDP, budget system, monetary stability\",\"PeriodicalId\":286012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v2i2.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v2i2.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在:分析货币财政政策是否会影响印尼的经济(GDP),以及预算制度的差异是否会影响财政治理对印尼GDP实现的支持。运用定量分析方法进行研究;使用的数据是1990-2010年的时间序列,使用的分析技术是带虚拟变量的多元回归。结果表明,货币稳定性——以可变的APBN、融资、投资、BI-rate、出口、进口、通货膨胀、汇率和预算制度差异为代表——同时显著影响GDP的发展。自变量与变量变量之间的相关程度相当强,r²为0.9969%。这意味着研究变量可以解释GDP动态的99.69%左右,效果受到其他未检查变量的影响。部分地,从统计分析的结果来看,APBN、投资、BI-Rate、进口和汇率对GDP的发展有影响,预算制度制度的差异对GDP的发展有显著影响。而变量融资、出口和通货膨胀对GDP的影响不显著。如果标准误差提高到19%,成本变量就会产生真正的影响。当标准误差提高到24%时,出口对GDP的影响显著。APBN、投资、BI-Rate和预算制度差异与GDP正相关。而进口和汇率与GDP呈负相关。货币稳定性对GDP影响的计量模型如下:GDP $ = 0.3131 * APBN + 1.8437 * INVEST $ + 7.8384 * BI_RATE - 0.00037 * IMPORT - 0.01226 * EXCHANGE $ + 167.02356 * REZIM1 + 181.1681 * REZIM2 + 197.6315。相对而言,采用综合的、基于绩效的预算制度比采用平衡的预算制度要好。同样,绩效预算制度也相对优于综合预算制度。这意味着印尼的预算制度改革到目前为止已经走上了正确的轨道。关键词:印尼,经济,GDP,预算制度,货币稳定
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PENGARUH FISKAL MONETER TERHADAP PEREKONOMIAN INDONESIA
ABSTRACTThis study aims to: analyze whether monetary fiscal policy affects the economy (GDP) of Indonesia and examine whether differences in the budget regime affect the fiscal fiscal governance in supporting the achievement of Indonesia's GDP. Research using quantitative analysis methods; The data used are time series 1990-2010, the analysis technique used is multiple regression with dummy variables. The results show that monetary stability - represented by the variable APBN, financing, investment, BI-rate, exports, imports, inflation, exchange rates and budget regime differences - simultaneously significantly influences GDP development. The level of correlation between the independent variables and the variable variable is quite strong with R-squared 0.9969%. This means that the research variables can explain the dynamics of GDP around 99.69%, the effect is influenced by other variables not examined. Partially, from the results of the statistical analysis, it was found that the APBN, investment, BI-Rate, Imports and the exchange rate had an effect and the difference in the budget system regime had a significant effect on the development of GDP. While the variable financing, exports and inflation have no significant effect on GDP. Cost variables can have a real impact if the standard error is raised to 19%. Exports can significantly affect GDP if the standard error is raised to 24%. APBN, investment, BI-Rate and budget regime differences are positively correlated to GDP. While imports and the exchange rate are negatively correlated to GDP. The econometric model of the influence of oneter stability with GDP is as follows: GDP $ = 0.3131 * APBN + 1.8437 * INVEST $ + 7.8384 * BI_RATE - 0.00037 * IMPORT - 0.01226 * EXCHANGE $ + 167.02356 * REZIM1 + 181.1681 * REZIM2 + 197.6315. Relatively, the use of an integrated and performance-based budgeting system is better than a balanced budget system. Likewise the performance-based budgeting system is also relatively better than the integrated budgeting system. This means that the budget system reform in Indonesia has been on the right track so far.Keywords: Indonesia, economy, GDP, budget system, monetary stability
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信