{"title":"网络编码性能:仿真实验","authors":"G. Lauer, D. Morris","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the performance of network coding to a baseline protocol that uses OLSR, SPF and NORM. The performance of each protocol suite is characterized in a three-hour militarily-relevant network topology using five (emulated) applications: video, voice, file transfer, situation awareness and messaging. Network coding provides comparable performance while using substantially less bandwidth. Simplified example scenarios are presented to provide insight into the reasons for network codingpsilas improved performance.","PeriodicalId":434891,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network coding performance: An emulation experiment\",\"authors\":\"G. Lauer, D. Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the performance of network coding to a baseline protocol that uses OLSR, SPF and NORM. The performance of each protocol suite is characterized in a three-hour militarily-relevant network topology using five (emulated) applications: video, voice, file transfer, situation awareness and messaging. Network coding provides comparable performance while using substantially less bandwidth. Simplified example scenarios are presented to provide insight into the reasons for network codingpsilas improved performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Network coding performance: An emulation experiment
This paper compares the performance of network coding to a baseline protocol that uses OLSR, SPF and NORM. The performance of each protocol suite is characterized in a three-hour militarily-relevant network topology using five (emulated) applications: video, voice, file transfer, situation awareness and messaging. Network coding provides comparable performance while using substantially less bandwidth. Simplified example scenarios are presented to provide insight into the reasons for network codingpsilas improved performance.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
