调节隶属度以获得临床决策支持系统中模糊集不确定性值的一致性

S. Hegazy, C. Buckingham
{"title":"调节隶属度以获得临床决策支持系统中模糊集不确定性值的一致性","authors":"S. Hegazy, C. Buckingham","doi":"10.1109/CENTRIC.2010.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with a very important issue in any knowledge engineering discipline: the accurate representation and modelling of real life data and its processing by human experts. The work is applied to the GRiST Mental Health Risk Screening Tool for assessing risks associated with mental-health problems. The complexity of risk data and the wide variations in clinicians’ expert opinions make it difficult to elicit representations of uncertainty that are an accurate and meaningful consensus. It requires integrating each expert’s estimation of a continuous distribution of uncertainty across a range of values. This paper describes an algorithm that generates a consensual distribution at the same time as measuring the consistency of inputs. Hence it provides a measure of the confidence in the particular data item’s risk contribution at the input stage and can help give an indication of the quality of subsequent risk predictions.","PeriodicalId":142806,"journal":{"name":"2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Human-Oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modulating Membership Grades to Gain Consensus for Fuzzy Set Uncertainty Values in a Clinical Decision Support System\",\"authors\":\"S. Hegazy, C. Buckingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CENTRIC.2010.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with a very important issue in any knowledge engineering discipline: the accurate representation and modelling of real life data and its processing by human experts. The work is applied to the GRiST Mental Health Risk Screening Tool for assessing risks associated with mental-health problems. The complexity of risk data and the wide variations in clinicians’ expert opinions make it difficult to elicit representations of uncertainty that are an accurate and meaningful consensus. It requires integrating each expert’s estimation of a continuous distribution of uncertainty across a range of values. This paper describes an algorithm that generates a consensual distribution at the same time as measuring the consistency of inputs. Hence it provides a measure of the confidence in the particular data item’s risk contribution at the input stage and can help give an indication of the quality of subsequent risk predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Human-Oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Human-Oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CENTRIC.2010.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Human-Oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CENTRIC.2010.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文讨论了任何知识工程学科中的一个非常重要的问题:真实生活数据的准确表示和建模以及人类专家对其进行处理。这项工作应用于GRiST心理健康风险筛选工具,用于评估与心理健康问题相关的风险。风险数据的复杂性和临床医生专家意见的广泛差异使得很难得出准确和有意义的共识的不确定性表示。它需要将每个专家对不确定性在一定范围内的连续分布的估计进行整合。本文描述了一种在测量输入一致性的同时生成共识分布的算法。因此,它提供了在输入阶段对特定数据项的风险贡献的信心度量,并且可以帮助指示后续风险预测的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modulating Membership Grades to Gain Consensus for Fuzzy Set Uncertainty Values in a Clinical Decision Support System
This paper deals with a very important issue in any knowledge engineering discipline: the accurate representation and modelling of real life data and its processing by human experts. The work is applied to the GRiST Mental Health Risk Screening Tool for assessing risks associated with mental-health problems. The complexity of risk data and the wide variations in clinicians’ expert opinions make it difficult to elicit representations of uncertainty that are an accurate and meaningful consensus. It requires integrating each expert’s estimation of a continuous distribution of uncertainty across a range of values. This paper describes an algorithm that generates a consensual distribution at the same time as measuring the consistency of inputs. Hence it provides a measure of the confidence in the particular data item’s risk contribution at the input stage and can help give an indication of the quality of subsequent risk predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信