为租赁物品提供保险和提供租赁本身原则上是不同的和独立的服务供应:对案例C-224/11 BGŻ租赁的评论

Marta Papis
{"title":"为租赁物品提供保险和提供租赁本身原则上是不同的和独立的服务供应:对案例C-224/11 BGŻ租赁的评论","authors":"Marta Papis","doi":"10.5235/20488432.2.2.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A long-running dispute between Polish leasing companies and the tax authorities as to whether leasing services supplied together with insurance for the leased item are to be treated as separate services or as one single composite leasing service seems to have been definitely settled by the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in BGŻ Leasing delivered on 17 January 2013. Indeed, the Court of Justice, in its long awaited judgment, clearly and firmly rejected the arguments of the tax authorities that insurance is always ancillary to leasing, as being linked to the leased item, and must not be considered an independent and separate service. To the contrary, the Court ruled that:","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A supply of insurance for a leased item and a supply of leasing itself are in principle distinct and independent supplies of services: a commentary on Case C-224/11 BGŻ Leasing\",\"authors\":\"Marta Papis\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/20488432.2.2.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A long-running dispute between Polish leasing companies and the tax authorities as to whether leasing services supplied together with insurance for the leased item are to be treated as separate services or as one single composite leasing service seems to have been definitely settled by the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in BGŻ Leasing delivered on 17 January 2013. Indeed, the Court of Justice, in its long awaited judgment, clearly and firmly rejected the arguments of the tax authorities that insurance is always ancillary to leasing, as being linked to the leased item, and must not be considered an independent and separate service. To the contrary, the Court ruled that:\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.2.2.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.2.2.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2013年1月17日,欧盟法院在BGŻ租赁案中作出裁决,解决了波兰租赁公司与税务机关之间长期存在的争议,即租赁服务与租赁物品的保险是否应被视为单独的服务,还是作为一个单一的综合租赁服务。事实上,法院在其期待已久的判决中明确而坚决地驳斥了税务当局的论点,即保险总是附属于租赁的,因为它与租赁物品相联系,不应被视为一种独立和单独的服务。相反,法院裁定:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A supply of insurance for a leased item and a supply of leasing itself are in principle distinct and independent supplies of services: a commentary on Case C-224/11 BGŻ Leasing
A long-running dispute between Polish leasing companies and the tax authorities as to whether leasing services supplied together with insurance for the leased item are to be treated as separate services or as one single composite leasing service seems to have been definitely settled by the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in BGŻ Leasing delivered on 17 January 2013. Indeed, the Court of Justice, in its long awaited judgment, clearly and firmly rejected the arguments of the tax authorities that insurance is always ancillary to leasing, as being linked to the leased item, and must not be considered an independent and separate service. To the contrary, the Court ruled that:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信