代理终点和应用的统计标准:综述

Shiro Tanaka, Koji Oba, K. Yoshimura, S. Teramukai
{"title":"代理终点和应用的统计标准:综述","authors":"Shiro Tanaka, Koji Oba, K. Yoshimura, S. Teramukai","doi":"10.5691/JJB.31.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surrogate endpoints, which represent a compromise in the conflict between measurability and clinical relevance of endpoints, have considerable advantage in rapid drug approvals compared to true endpoints in confirmatory clinical trials dealing with life-threatening diseases, such as cancer or AIDS. However, past experiences have shown the risk of relying too heavily on surrogate endpoints. In this paper, we review statistical criteria for evaluating surrogate endpoints and the past examples properly evaluated the surrogacy, taking into consideration relevant clinical and statistical issues.","PeriodicalId":365545,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical Criteria for Surrogate Endpoint and Applications : A Review\",\"authors\":\"Shiro Tanaka, Koji Oba, K. Yoshimura, S. Teramukai\",\"doi\":\"10.5691/JJB.31.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surrogate endpoints, which represent a compromise in the conflict between measurability and clinical relevance of endpoints, have considerable advantage in rapid drug approvals compared to true endpoints in confirmatory clinical trials dealing with life-threatening diseases, such as cancer or AIDS. However, past experiences have shown the risk of relying too heavily on surrogate endpoints. In this paper, we review statistical criteria for evaluating surrogate endpoints and the past examples properly evaluated the surrogacy, taking into consideration relevant clinical and statistical issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of biometrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of biometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.31.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.31.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

替代终点是在终点的可测量性和临床相关性之间的冲突中取得的一种妥协,在处理危及生命的疾病(如癌症或艾滋病)的确证性临床试验中,与真正终点相比,替代终点在快速药物批准方面具有相当大的优势。然而,过去的经验表明过度依赖替代终点是有风险的。在本文中,我们回顾了评估代孕终点的统计标准和过去的例子,考虑到相关的临床和统计问题,正确评估代孕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical Criteria for Surrogate Endpoint and Applications : A Review
Surrogate endpoints, which represent a compromise in the conflict between measurability and clinical relevance of endpoints, have considerable advantage in rapid drug approvals compared to true endpoints in confirmatory clinical trials dealing with life-threatening diseases, such as cancer or AIDS. However, past experiences have shown the risk of relying too heavily on surrogate endpoints. In this paper, we review statistical criteria for evaluating surrogate endpoints and the past examples properly evaluated the surrogacy, taking into consideration relevant clinical and statistical issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信