缺血性心脏病的干细胞治疗:临床试验结果和未来

G. I. Gallicano, Nina Kishore, Gino DiNicola, A. Molotkova, Jessica Hsueh
{"title":"缺血性心脏病的干细胞治疗:临床试验结果和未来","authors":"G. I. Gallicano, Nina Kishore, Gino DiNicola, A. Molotkova, Jessica Hsueh","doi":"10.15406/jsrt.2022.07.00154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ischemic heart disease carries high morbidity and mortality despite modern pharmaceutical treatment and revascularization procedures. Biologic stem cell therapy offers the potential to revolutionize clinical outcomes for ischemic heart disease by reducing scarring and improving cardiac function. Several small randomized clinical trials have been done utilizing various methodologies, different types of stem cells and doses, and measuring different clinical outcomes. The findings of these individual studies, as well as larger meta-analyses, have been inconsistent likely due to the significant heterogeneity within the methods used. In this review, we provide a more structured approach by comparing the recent studies by type of disease, stem cells, dose, delivery method, and outcome in an effort to draw attention to the similarities and differences in these studies and the need for a standardized approach in larger trials. We show that out of all the current stem cell therapies that have been tried, Adult stem cells, primarily mesenchymal stem cells are currently the most promising for post-myocardial infarction and heart failure while granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and bone marrow mononuclear treatment show efficacy in treating ischemic cardiomyopathy. Lastly, we discuss the potential future directions of stem cell therapy for clinical application in ischemic heart disease.","PeriodicalId":172569,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapeutics","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stem cell therapies for ischemic heart disease: clinical trial outcomes and futures\",\"authors\":\"G. I. Gallicano, Nina Kishore, Gino DiNicola, A. Molotkova, Jessica Hsueh\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/jsrt.2022.07.00154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ischemic heart disease carries high morbidity and mortality despite modern pharmaceutical treatment and revascularization procedures. Biologic stem cell therapy offers the potential to revolutionize clinical outcomes for ischemic heart disease by reducing scarring and improving cardiac function. Several small randomized clinical trials have been done utilizing various methodologies, different types of stem cells and doses, and measuring different clinical outcomes. The findings of these individual studies, as well as larger meta-analyses, have been inconsistent likely due to the significant heterogeneity within the methods used. In this review, we provide a more structured approach by comparing the recent studies by type of disease, stem cells, dose, delivery method, and outcome in an effort to draw attention to the similarities and differences in these studies and the need for a standardized approach in larger trials. We show that out of all the current stem cell therapies that have been tried, Adult stem cells, primarily mesenchymal stem cells are currently the most promising for post-myocardial infarction and heart failure while granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and bone marrow mononuclear treatment show efficacy in treating ischemic cardiomyopathy. Lastly, we discuss the potential future directions of stem cell therapy for clinical application in ischemic heart disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/jsrt.2022.07.00154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jsrt.2022.07.00154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有现代药物治疗和血运重建术,缺血性心脏病仍有很高的发病率和死亡率。生物干细胞疗法通过减少疤痕和改善心脏功能,为缺血性心脏病的临床结果提供了革命性的潜力。一些小型的随机临床试验使用了不同的方法,不同类型的干细胞和剂量,并测量了不同的临床结果。这些单独研究的结果,以及更大的荟萃分析,可能由于所使用的方法存在显著的异质性而不一致。在这篇综述中,我们通过比较最近的疾病类型、干细胞、剂量、给药方法和结果的研究,提供了一种更结构化的方法,以引起人们对这些研究的异同的注意,并在更大规模的试验中需要一种标准化的方法。我们表明,在目前所有已经尝试的干细胞疗法中,成体干细胞,主要是间充质干细胞是目前治疗心肌梗死和心力衰竭最有希望的,而粒细胞集落刺激因子和骨髓单核细胞治疗在治疗缺血性心肌病方面显示出疗效。最后,我们讨论了干细胞治疗在缺血性心脏病临床应用的潜在未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stem cell therapies for ischemic heart disease: clinical trial outcomes and futures
Ischemic heart disease carries high morbidity and mortality despite modern pharmaceutical treatment and revascularization procedures. Biologic stem cell therapy offers the potential to revolutionize clinical outcomes for ischemic heart disease by reducing scarring and improving cardiac function. Several small randomized clinical trials have been done utilizing various methodologies, different types of stem cells and doses, and measuring different clinical outcomes. The findings of these individual studies, as well as larger meta-analyses, have been inconsistent likely due to the significant heterogeneity within the methods used. In this review, we provide a more structured approach by comparing the recent studies by type of disease, stem cells, dose, delivery method, and outcome in an effort to draw attention to the similarities and differences in these studies and the need for a standardized approach in larger trials. We show that out of all the current stem cell therapies that have been tried, Adult stem cells, primarily mesenchymal stem cells are currently the most promising for post-myocardial infarction and heart failure while granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and bone marrow mononuclear treatment show efficacy in treating ischemic cardiomyopathy. Lastly, we discuss the potential future directions of stem cell therapy for clinical application in ischemic heart disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信