Lyra:对区块链中重新排序攻击的快速和可扩展的弹性

Pouriya Zarbafian, V. Gramoli
{"title":"Lyra:对区块链中重新排序攻击的快速和可扩展的弹性","authors":"Pouriya Zarbafian, V. Gramoli","doi":"10.1109/IPDPS54959.2023.00097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reordering blockchain transactions to manipulate markets profited hackers by hundreds of millions of dollars. Because they rely on State Machine Replication (SMR), blockchains order transactions without preventing hackers from influencing the chosen order. Some order-fair consensus protocols, like Pompē [33], order transactions before agreeing on this order. They are insufficient because a hacker can leverage the lack of triangle inequality among network latencies to observe pending transactions before issuing their own. Other DAG-based protocols, like Fino [24], use commit-reveal to obfuscate transactions, but cannot prevent reordering by a Byzantine leader.In this paper, we present Lyra, a protocol that solves this problem. The key idea is the combination of a commit-reveal protocol to obfuscate transaction payloads, and a leaderless ordered consensus protocol that predicts the order of transactions. Lyra has optimal good-case latency, prevents reordering attacks, and is scalable. Finally, it outperforms the latency of Pompē by up to 2 times and its throughput by up to 7 times on a 100-node network over 3 continents.","PeriodicalId":343684,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lyra: Fast and Scalable Resilience to Reordering Attacks in Blockchains\",\"authors\":\"Pouriya Zarbafian, V. Gramoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPDPS54959.2023.00097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reordering blockchain transactions to manipulate markets profited hackers by hundreds of millions of dollars. Because they rely on State Machine Replication (SMR), blockchains order transactions without preventing hackers from influencing the chosen order. Some order-fair consensus protocols, like Pompē [33], order transactions before agreeing on this order. They are insufficient because a hacker can leverage the lack of triangle inequality among network latencies to observe pending transactions before issuing their own. Other DAG-based protocols, like Fino [24], use commit-reveal to obfuscate transactions, but cannot prevent reordering by a Byzantine leader.In this paper, we present Lyra, a protocol that solves this problem. The key idea is the combination of a commit-reveal protocol to obfuscate transaction payloads, and a leaderless ordered consensus protocol that predicts the order of transactions. Lyra has optimal good-case latency, prevents reordering attacks, and is scalable. Finally, it outperforms the latency of Pompē by up to 2 times and its throughput by up to 7 times on a 100-node network over 3 continents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS54959.2023.00097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS54959.2023.00097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过重新排序区块链交易来操纵市场,黑客从中获利数亿美元。由于它们依赖于状态机复制(SMR),区块链在不阻止黑客影响所选顺序的情况下对交易进行排序。一些秩序公平的共识协议,如pompku[33],在同意这个顺序之前对交易进行排序。它们是不够的,因为黑客可以利用网络延迟之间缺乏三角形不等式来观察待处理的事务,然后再发布自己的事务。其他基于dag的协议,如Fino[24],使用commit-reveal来混淆交易,但不能防止拜占庭领导的重新排序。在本文中,我们提出了Lyra,一个解决这个问题的协议。其关键思想是将用于混淆事务有效负载的提交-披露协议与用于预测事务顺序的无领导有序共识协议相结合。Lyra具有最佳的良好案例延迟,防止重新排序攻击,并且具有可扩展性。最后,在3个大洲的100个节点网络上,它的延迟比pompæ高2倍,吞吐量高7倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lyra: Fast and Scalable Resilience to Reordering Attacks in Blockchains
Reordering blockchain transactions to manipulate markets profited hackers by hundreds of millions of dollars. Because they rely on State Machine Replication (SMR), blockchains order transactions without preventing hackers from influencing the chosen order. Some order-fair consensus protocols, like Pompē [33], order transactions before agreeing on this order. They are insufficient because a hacker can leverage the lack of triangle inequality among network latencies to observe pending transactions before issuing their own. Other DAG-based protocols, like Fino [24], use commit-reveal to obfuscate transactions, but cannot prevent reordering by a Byzantine leader.In this paper, we present Lyra, a protocol that solves this problem. The key idea is the combination of a commit-reveal protocol to obfuscate transaction payloads, and a leaderless ordered consensus protocol that predicts the order of transactions. Lyra has optimal good-case latency, prevents reordering attacks, and is scalable. Finally, it outperforms the latency of Pompē by up to 2 times and its throughput by up to 7 times on a 100-node network over 3 continents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信