弥合差距2021-总结报告

I. Chakravorty, S. Daga, Shivani Sharma, Martin Fischer, S. Chakravorty, R. Mehta
{"title":"弥合差距2021-总结报告","authors":"I. Chakravorty, S. Daga, Shivani Sharma, Martin Fischer, S. Chakravorty, R. Mehta","doi":"10.38192/btg21.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential Attainment \n \nHealthcare professionals are among the most respected, valued members in any society- and also the most regulated. It attracts some of the most talented, innovative and resilient individuals who are keen to do good. Respect, job satisfaction and autonomy are fundamental to the experience of any professional, and often valued above financial or material reward. Doctors are no different. \nEducation and training of the healthcare workforce is a lengthy and resource intense process. No nation-state can be truly self-sufficient. Hence workforce migration is a reality where various pull and push factors lead to professionals moving across countries and continents, in the service of populations. \nSociety is divided along many lines and steeped with structural inequalities. Many of these are the result of thousands of years of history, legacy and societal wrongs. Healthcare services and professionals reflect similar patterns of the 'big society'. \nThe phenomenon of differential attainment (DA), which is the subject of this report is simply a manifestation of such structural inequalities. DA or differential outcomes for doctors due to their age, race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, disability, socio-economic deprivation or influenced by migrant status - rather than motivation, ability, effort or enterprise. \nDA is fundamentally unfair. Those affected by DA are either unaware or unable to counteract the influence on their careers. DA leads to demoralisation, disengagement and poor outcomes for professionals and their patients. It takes its toll not only on careers but on lives and livelihoods. DA leads to a huge under-utlisation of human resources- a true waste of talent and enterprise. \nThis report- BTG21 focuses on DA in the medical profession exploring the career cycle through the themes of recruitment, assessments, career progression, research & academia, leadership roles, awards and professionalism. \nBTG21 is people-centred and in tackling inequalities offers solutions on career fulfillment and wellbeing- by an ideological shift of hearts and minds. \n \nThematic Synthesis \n \nBTG21 summary report is the culmination of a thematic synthesis of evidence covering the full spectrum of medical careers. It presents lived experiences (collected through mixed method approaches) capturing patterns in peoples experiences through an online survey, and in-depth qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of professionals from across the career cycle, range of ethnic heritage, medical specialism and country of origin. \nFollowed by consensus developed through workshops by a triumvirate of experts, stakeholders and grassroots professionals. \nThere are 5 primary causes of DA- bias, social class & deprivation, immigration status, geographical and individual factors and impacts every stage of medical professional careers. \nThe thematic synthesis reviews are published in the Sushruta Journal of Health Policy. \n \nRecommendations \n \nThe Workshop discussions, recommendations (the 10-point plan) include policy enablers, immediate actions and research questions in the following areas; \n \n \n \nTackling bias \nEmbracing diversity & inclusion \nCelebrating the contribution of migrants \nLeveling the playing field \nInclusive leadership & accountability \nRemoving structural barriers \nReview-Reform-Rethink assessments \nRedefining professionalism \nDisaggregation-intersectionality-benchmarking of data \nSupport-flexibility & Wellbeing \n \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":365463,"journal":{"name":"Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinion","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Gap 2021- Summary Report\",\"authors\":\"I. Chakravorty, S. Daga, Shivani Sharma, Martin Fischer, S. Chakravorty, R. Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.38192/btg21.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Differential Attainment \\n \\nHealthcare professionals are among the most respected, valued members in any society- and also the most regulated. It attracts some of the most talented, innovative and resilient individuals who are keen to do good. Respect, job satisfaction and autonomy are fundamental to the experience of any professional, and often valued above financial or material reward. Doctors are no different. \\nEducation and training of the healthcare workforce is a lengthy and resource intense process. No nation-state can be truly self-sufficient. Hence workforce migration is a reality where various pull and push factors lead to professionals moving across countries and continents, in the service of populations. \\nSociety is divided along many lines and steeped with structural inequalities. Many of these are the result of thousands of years of history, legacy and societal wrongs. Healthcare services and professionals reflect similar patterns of the 'big society'. \\nThe phenomenon of differential attainment (DA), which is the subject of this report is simply a manifestation of such structural inequalities. DA or differential outcomes for doctors due to their age, race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, disability, socio-economic deprivation or influenced by migrant status - rather than motivation, ability, effort or enterprise. \\nDA is fundamentally unfair. Those affected by DA are either unaware or unable to counteract the influence on their careers. DA leads to demoralisation, disengagement and poor outcomes for professionals and their patients. It takes its toll not only on careers but on lives and livelihoods. DA leads to a huge under-utlisation of human resources- a true waste of talent and enterprise. \\nThis report- BTG21 focuses on DA in the medical profession exploring the career cycle through the themes of recruitment, assessments, career progression, research & academia, leadership roles, awards and professionalism. \\nBTG21 is people-centred and in tackling inequalities offers solutions on career fulfillment and wellbeing- by an ideological shift of hearts and minds. \\n \\nThematic Synthesis \\n \\nBTG21 summary report is the culmination of a thematic synthesis of evidence covering the full spectrum of medical careers. It presents lived experiences (collected through mixed method approaches) capturing patterns in peoples experiences through an online survey, and in-depth qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of professionals from across the career cycle, range of ethnic heritage, medical specialism and country of origin. \\nFollowed by consensus developed through workshops by a triumvirate of experts, stakeholders and grassroots professionals. \\nThere are 5 primary causes of DA- bias, social class & deprivation, immigration status, geographical and individual factors and impacts every stage of medical professional careers. \\nThe thematic synthesis reviews are published in the Sushruta Journal of Health Policy. \\n \\nRecommendations \\n \\nThe Workshop discussions, recommendations (the 10-point plan) include policy enablers, immediate actions and research questions in the following areas; \\n \\n \\n \\nTackling bias \\nEmbracing diversity & inclusion \\nCelebrating the contribution of migrants \\nLeveling the playing field \\nInclusive leadership & accountability \\nRemoving structural barriers \\nReview-Reform-Rethink assessments \\nRedefining professionalism \\nDisaggregation-intersectionality-benchmarking of data \\nSupport-flexibility & Wellbeing \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":365463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinion\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38192/btg21.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38192/btg21.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在任何社会中,医疗保健专业人员都是最受尊重、最受重视的成员之一,也是最受监管的。它吸引了一些最有才华、最具创新精神、最具韧性的人,他们热衷于做好事。尊重、工作满意度和自主权是任何专业人士经历的基础,往往比经济或物质奖励更有价值。医生也不例外。医疗保健工作人员的教育和培训是一个漫长而资源紧张的过程。没有一个民族国家能够真正做到自给自足。因此,劳动力迁移是一个现实,各种拉动和推动因素导致专业人员跨越国家和大陆,为人口服务。社会在许多方面是分裂的,充满了结构性的不平等。其中许多是数千年历史、遗产和社会错误的结果。保健服务和专业人员反映了“大社会”的类似模式。作为本报告主题的差异成就现象只是这种结构性不平等的一种表现。由于医生的年龄、种族、性别、性取向、种族、残疾、社会经济剥夺或受移民身份的影响,而不是动机、能力、努力或进取心,医生的DA或差异结果。DA从根本上来说是不公平的。那些受DA影响的人要么没有意识到,要么无法抵消对他们职业生涯的影响。DA会导致专业人员和他们的病人士气低落,脱离工作,结果不佳。它不仅会影响职业生涯,还会影响生活和生计。DA导致人力资源的严重利用不足——这是人才和企业的真正浪费。本报告- BTG21重点关注医疗行业的数据分析,通过招聘、评估、职业发展、研究与学术、领导角色、奖励和专业精神等主题探索职业周期。BTG21以人为本,通过心灵和思想的意识形态转变,解决不平等问题,为职业实现和福祉提供解决方案。专题综合BTG21摘要报告是对涵盖所有医疗职业的证据进行专题综合的结果。它展示了生活经验(通过混合方法收集),通过在线调查捕捉人们经验中的模式,并对来自整个职业周期、种族遗产范围、医学专业和原籍国的专业人员进行了深入的定性访谈。随后,由专家、利益相关者和基层专业人士组成的三人小组通过研讨会达成共识。产生DA偏差的主要原因有5个,分别是社会阶层和剥夺、移民身份、地理和个人因素,影响着医学职业生涯的各个阶段。专题综合评论发表在《Sushruta卫生政策杂志》上。研讨会的讨论、建议(10点计划)包括以下领域的政策推动因素、立即行动和研究问题;消除偏见拥抱多样性和包容性颂扬移民的贡献创造公平的竞争环境包容性领导和问责制消除结构性障碍审查-改革-重新思考评估重新定义专业精神分解-交叉-数据基准支持-灵活性和福祉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the Gap 2021- Summary Report
Differential Attainment Healthcare professionals are among the most respected, valued members in any society- and also the most regulated. It attracts some of the most talented, innovative and resilient individuals who are keen to do good. Respect, job satisfaction and autonomy are fundamental to the experience of any professional, and often valued above financial or material reward. Doctors are no different. Education and training of the healthcare workforce is a lengthy and resource intense process. No nation-state can be truly self-sufficient. Hence workforce migration is a reality where various pull and push factors lead to professionals moving across countries and continents, in the service of populations. Society is divided along many lines and steeped with structural inequalities. Many of these are the result of thousands of years of history, legacy and societal wrongs. Healthcare services and professionals reflect similar patterns of the 'big society'. The phenomenon of differential attainment (DA), which is the subject of this report is simply a manifestation of such structural inequalities. DA or differential outcomes for doctors due to their age, race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, disability, socio-economic deprivation or influenced by migrant status - rather than motivation, ability, effort or enterprise. DA is fundamentally unfair. Those affected by DA are either unaware or unable to counteract the influence on their careers. DA leads to demoralisation, disengagement and poor outcomes for professionals and their patients. It takes its toll not only on careers but on lives and livelihoods. DA leads to a huge under-utlisation of human resources- a true waste of talent and enterprise. This report- BTG21 focuses on DA in the medical profession exploring the career cycle through the themes of recruitment, assessments, career progression, research & academia, leadership roles, awards and professionalism. BTG21 is people-centred and in tackling inequalities offers solutions on career fulfillment and wellbeing- by an ideological shift of hearts and minds. Thematic Synthesis BTG21 summary report is the culmination of a thematic synthesis of evidence covering the full spectrum of medical careers. It presents lived experiences (collected through mixed method approaches) capturing patterns in peoples experiences through an online survey, and in-depth qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of professionals from across the career cycle, range of ethnic heritage, medical specialism and country of origin. Followed by consensus developed through workshops by a triumvirate of experts, stakeholders and grassroots professionals. There are 5 primary causes of DA- bias, social class & deprivation, immigration status, geographical and individual factors and impacts every stage of medical professional careers. The thematic synthesis reviews are published in the Sushruta Journal of Health Policy. Recommendations The Workshop discussions, recommendations (the 10-point plan) include policy enablers, immediate actions and research questions in the following areas; Tackling bias Embracing diversity & inclusion Celebrating the contribution of migrants Leveling the playing field Inclusive leadership & accountability Removing structural barriers Review-Reform-Rethink assessments Redefining professionalism Disaggregation-intersectionality-benchmarking of data Support-flexibility & Wellbeing
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信