SoK:加密货币中的洗钱

Kartick Kolachala, Ecem Simsek, Mohammed Ababneh, Roopa Vishwanathan
{"title":"SoK:加密货币中的洗钱","authors":"Kartick Kolachala, Ecem Simsek, Mohammed Ababneh, Roopa Vishwanathan","doi":"10.1145/3465481.3465774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Money laundering using cryptocurrencies has become increasingly prevalent, and global and national regulatory authorities have announced plans to implement stringent anti-money laundering regulations. In this paper, we examine current anti-money laundering (AML) mechanisms in cryptocurrencies and payment networks from a technical and policy perspective, and point out practical challenges in implementing and enforcing them. We first discuss blacklisting, a recently proposed technique to combat money laundering, which seems appealing, but leaves several unanswered questions and challenges with regard to its enforcement. We then discuss payment networks and find that there are unique problems in the payment network domain that might require custom-designed AML solutions, as opposed to general cryptocurrency AML techniques. Finally, we examine the regulatory guidelines and recommendations as laid out by the global Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the U.S. based Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), and find that there are several ambiguities in their interpretation and implementation. To quantify the effects of money laundering, we conduct experiments on real-world transaction datasets. Our goal in this paper is to survey the landscape of existing AML mechanisms, and focus the attention of the research community on this issue. Our findings indicate the community must endeavor to treat AML regulations and technical methods as an integral part of the systems they build and must strive to design solutions from the ground up that respect AML regulatory frameworks. We hope that this paper will serve as a point of reference for researchers that wish to build systems with AML mechanisms, and will help them understand the challenges that lie ahead.","PeriodicalId":417395,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SoK: Money Laundering in Cryptocurrencies\",\"authors\":\"Kartick Kolachala, Ecem Simsek, Mohammed Ababneh, Roopa Vishwanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3465481.3465774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Money laundering using cryptocurrencies has become increasingly prevalent, and global and national regulatory authorities have announced plans to implement stringent anti-money laundering regulations. In this paper, we examine current anti-money laundering (AML) mechanisms in cryptocurrencies and payment networks from a technical and policy perspective, and point out practical challenges in implementing and enforcing them. We first discuss blacklisting, a recently proposed technique to combat money laundering, which seems appealing, but leaves several unanswered questions and challenges with regard to its enforcement. We then discuss payment networks and find that there are unique problems in the payment network domain that might require custom-designed AML solutions, as opposed to general cryptocurrency AML techniques. Finally, we examine the regulatory guidelines and recommendations as laid out by the global Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the U.S. based Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), and find that there are several ambiguities in their interpretation and implementation. To quantify the effects of money laundering, we conduct experiments on real-world transaction datasets. Our goal in this paper is to survey the landscape of existing AML mechanisms, and focus the attention of the research community on this issue. Our findings indicate the community must endeavor to treat AML regulations and technical methods as an integral part of the systems they build and must strive to design solutions from the ground up that respect AML regulatory frameworks. We hope that this paper will serve as a point of reference for researchers that wish to build systems with AML mechanisms, and will help them understand the challenges that lie ahead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465481.3465774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465481.3465774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

使用加密货币洗钱变得越来越普遍,全球和国家监管机构已经宣布计划实施严格的反洗钱法规。在本文中,我们从技术和政策的角度研究了加密货币和支付网络中当前的反洗钱(AML)机制,并指出了实施和执行这些机制的实际挑战。我们首先讨论黑名单,这是最近提出的一项打击洗钱的技术,看起来很有吸引力,但在执行方面留下了几个悬而未决的问题和挑战。然后,我们讨论了支付网络,并发现支付网络领域存在独特的问题,可能需要定制设计的反洗钱解决方案,而不是一般的加密货币反洗钱技术。最后,我们研究了全球金融行动特别工作组(FATF)和美国金融犯罪执法网络(FinCEN)制定的监管指南和建议,并发现在其解释和实施中存在一些含糊之处。为了量化洗钱的影响,我们在现实世界的交易数据集上进行了实验。我们在本文中的目标是调查现有AML机制的景观,并将研究社区的注意力集中在这个问题上。我们的研究结果表明,社区必须努力将“反洗钱”法规和技术方法视为其构建的系统的组成部分,并且必须努力从头开始设计尊重“反洗钱”监管框架的解决方案。我们希望这篇论文能够成为希望构建具有反洗钱机制的系统的研究人员的参考点,并将帮助他们了解未来的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SoK: Money Laundering in Cryptocurrencies
Money laundering using cryptocurrencies has become increasingly prevalent, and global and national regulatory authorities have announced plans to implement stringent anti-money laundering regulations. In this paper, we examine current anti-money laundering (AML) mechanisms in cryptocurrencies and payment networks from a technical and policy perspective, and point out practical challenges in implementing and enforcing them. We first discuss blacklisting, a recently proposed technique to combat money laundering, which seems appealing, but leaves several unanswered questions and challenges with regard to its enforcement. We then discuss payment networks and find that there are unique problems in the payment network domain that might require custom-designed AML solutions, as opposed to general cryptocurrency AML techniques. Finally, we examine the regulatory guidelines and recommendations as laid out by the global Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the U.S. based Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), and find that there are several ambiguities in their interpretation and implementation. To quantify the effects of money laundering, we conduct experiments on real-world transaction datasets. Our goal in this paper is to survey the landscape of existing AML mechanisms, and focus the attention of the research community on this issue. Our findings indicate the community must endeavor to treat AML regulations and technical methods as an integral part of the systems they build and must strive to design solutions from the ground up that respect AML regulatory frameworks. We hope that this paper will serve as a point of reference for researchers that wish to build systems with AML mechanisms, and will help them understand the challenges that lie ahead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信