人类父亲:多学科视角

Anna Jane Machin
{"title":"人类父亲:多学科视角","authors":"Anna Jane Machin","doi":"10.53841/bpsspr.2010.12.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term fatherhood is overlain with a complex set of cultural, psychological and historical meanings. Nevertheless, for the majority of history it has implied little more than a role as bread winner and, as such, was afforded little academic focus as compared to that of the mother. However, the increasing numbers of gay men who take up fatherhood and absent fathers who actively pursue contact with their children combined with the general acceptance amongst new fathers of the ‘new fatherhood model’ make it clear that men are both motivated to create and maintain unique bonds with their children in the absence of a relationship with the mother and to adopt, where society allows, an identity centred upon compassion for and active involvement with their children (Finn & Henwood, 2009). Despite this, while the quantity of research into fatherhood has increased in recent years much of it focuses upon the psychological and behavioural impact of absent fathers upon child development within Westernised societies rather than asking a series of key ethological and neurobiological questions aimed at understanding the behavioural, emotional and motivational aspects of this behaviour from the father’s perspective. This paper aims to rectify this imbalance by reviewing the nature of fatherhood from a multi-disciplinary perspective incorporating psychology, anthropology, ethnography and neurobiology. Further, it aims to identify why an understanding of the father’s role is important both from the perspective of academia and society and to suggest future research programmes with the aim of identifying the complex, varying and unique role that fathers play across societies.","PeriodicalId":278221,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychological Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human fatherhood: A multi-disciplinary perspective\",\"authors\":\"Anna Jane Machin\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpsspr.2010.12.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The term fatherhood is overlain with a complex set of cultural, psychological and historical meanings. Nevertheless, for the majority of history it has implied little more than a role as bread winner and, as such, was afforded little academic focus as compared to that of the mother. However, the increasing numbers of gay men who take up fatherhood and absent fathers who actively pursue contact with their children combined with the general acceptance amongst new fathers of the ‘new fatherhood model’ make it clear that men are both motivated to create and maintain unique bonds with their children in the absence of a relationship with the mother and to adopt, where society allows, an identity centred upon compassion for and active involvement with their children (Finn & Henwood, 2009). Despite this, while the quantity of research into fatherhood has increased in recent years much of it focuses upon the psychological and behavioural impact of absent fathers upon child development within Westernised societies rather than asking a series of key ethological and neurobiological questions aimed at understanding the behavioural, emotional and motivational aspects of this behaviour from the father’s perspective. This paper aims to rectify this imbalance by reviewing the nature of fatherhood from a multi-disciplinary perspective incorporating psychology, anthropology, ethnography and neurobiology. Further, it aims to identify why an understanding of the father’s role is important both from the perspective of academia and society and to suggest future research programmes with the aim of identifying the complex, varying and unique role that fathers play across societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychological Review\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2010.12.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2010.12.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“父亲”这个词被一套复杂的文化、心理和历史含义所覆盖。然而,在历史的大部分时间里,它只不过意味着养家糊口的角色,因此,与母亲相比,它很少受到学术关注。然而,越来越多的男同性恋者成为了父亲,缺席的父亲积极地寻求与孩子的接触,再加上新父亲对“新父亲模式”的普遍接受,这清楚地表明,在与母亲没有关系的情况下,男性有动力与孩子建立并保持独特的联系,并在社会允许的情况下收养孩子,一种以同情和积极参与孩子为中心的身份(Finn & Henwood, 2009)。尽管如此,尽管近年来关于父亲的研究数量有所增加,但其中大部分都集中在西方社会中缺席父亲对儿童发展的心理和行为影响上,而不是提出一系列关键的行为学和神经生物学问题,旨在从父亲的角度理解这种行为的行为,情感和动机方面。本文旨在通过从心理学、人类学、民族志和神经生物学等多学科的角度来审视父权的本质,从而纠正这种不平衡。此外,它旨在从学术界和社会的角度确定为什么理解父亲的角色很重要,并为未来的研究方案提出建议,目的是确定父亲在整个社会中发挥的复杂、多样和独特的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human fatherhood: A multi-disciplinary perspective
The term fatherhood is overlain with a complex set of cultural, psychological and historical meanings. Nevertheless, for the majority of history it has implied little more than a role as bread winner and, as such, was afforded little academic focus as compared to that of the mother. However, the increasing numbers of gay men who take up fatherhood and absent fathers who actively pursue contact with their children combined with the general acceptance amongst new fathers of the ‘new fatherhood model’ make it clear that men are both motivated to create and maintain unique bonds with their children in the absence of a relationship with the mother and to adopt, where society allows, an identity centred upon compassion for and active involvement with their children (Finn & Henwood, 2009). Despite this, while the quantity of research into fatherhood has increased in recent years much of it focuses upon the psychological and behavioural impact of absent fathers upon child development within Westernised societies rather than asking a series of key ethological and neurobiological questions aimed at understanding the behavioural, emotional and motivational aspects of this behaviour from the father’s perspective. This paper aims to rectify this imbalance by reviewing the nature of fatherhood from a multi-disciplinary perspective incorporating psychology, anthropology, ethnography and neurobiology. Further, it aims to identify why an understanding of the father’s role is important both from the perspective of academia and society and to suggest future research programmes with the aim of identifying the complex, varying and unique role that fathers play across societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信