叠加,护目镜和投影,哦,我的天!探索公众对增强现实技术的看法

Alexandra Thompson, L. Potter
{"title":"叠加,护目镜和投影,哦,我的天!探索公众对增强现实技术的看法","authors":"Alexandra Thompson, L. Potter","doi":"10.1145/3369457.3369482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Augmented reality (AR) technologies have been available to the general public in varying formats for several years, but confusion remains about what AR actually is, and what it can do. This paper explores how well mental models of the general public align with the standing definitions of AR from an academic perspective. We also seek to understand whether individual experience with augmented reality technologies, or self-rated willingness to adopt new technologies, correlate with the accuracy of an individual's understanding of AR. A pilot survey asking participants to describe augmented reality revealed a variety of mental models, some of which aligned with academically defined characteristics of AR. The accuracy of the responses decreased in participants with no hands-on AR experience, and willingness to adopt new technology proved to have little to no influence on response accuracy. This paper presents some initial trends in public perceptions of augmented reality technologies, but also highlights the need for more research to establish a better understanding of mental models of AR.","PeriodicalId":258766,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overlays and Goggles and Projections, Oh My!: Exploring Public Perceptions of Augmented Reality Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Thompson, L. Potter\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3369457.3369482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Augmented reality (AR) technologies have been available to the general public in varying formats for several years, but confusion remains about what AR actually is, and what it can do. This paper explores how well mental models of the general public align with the standing definitions of AR from an academic perspective. We also seek to understand whether individual experience with augmented reality technologies, or self-rated willingness to adopt new technologies, correlate with the accuracy of an individual's understanding of AR. A pilot survey asking participants to describe augmented reality revealed a variety of mental models, some of which aligned with academically defined characteristics of AR. The accuracy of the responses decreased in participants with no hands-on AR experience, and willingness to adopt new technology proved to have little to no influence on response accuracy. This paper presents some initial trends in public perceptions of augmented reality technologies, but also highlights the need for more research to establish a better understanding of mental models of AR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

增强现实(AR)技术已经以不同的形式向公众提供了几年,但关于AR到底是什么以及它能做什么仍然存在困惑。本文从学术角度探讨了公众的心理模型与AR的长期定义的一致性。我们还试图了解个人对增强现实技术的体验,或采用新技术的自我评估意愿,是否与个人对AR理解的准确性相关。一项要求参与者描述增强现实的试点调查揭示了各种心理模型,其中一些与学术上定义的AR特征一致。没有实际AR经验的参与者的回答准确性下降。事实证明,采用新技术的意愿对反应准确性几乎没有影响。本文提出了公众对增强现实技术认知的一些初步趋势,但也强调了需要更多的研究来更好地理解增强现实的心理模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overlays and Goggles and Projections, Oh My!: Exploring Public Perceptions of Augmented Reality Technologies
Augmented reality (AR) technologies have been available to the general public in varying formats for several years, but confusion remains about what AR actually is, and what it can do. This paper explores how well mental models of the general public align with the standing definitions of AR from an academic perspective. We also seek to understand whether individual experience with augmented reality technologies, or self-rated willingness to adopt new technologies, correlate with the accuracy of an individual's understanding of AR. A pilot survey asking participants to describe augmented reality revealed a variety of mental models, some of which aligned with academically defined characteristics of AR. The accuracy of the responses decreased in participants with no hands-on AR experience, and willingness to adopt new technology proved to have little to no influence on response accuracy. This paper presents some initial trends in public perceptions of augmented reality technologies, but also highlights the need for more research to establish a better understanding of mental models of AR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信