尼日利亚的土地所有制、土地产权和采用生物强化木薯:政策影响

Kolapo Adetomiwa, Abimbola Esther Iseoluwa, Omilaju Samuel Babatunde
{"title":"尼日利亚的土地所有制、土地产权和采用生物强化木薯:政策影响","authors":"Kolapo Adetomiwa, Abimbola Esther Iseoluwa, Omilaju Samuel Babatunde","doi":"10.1177/23210249211001988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated land tenure, land right and rental system, as it relates to adoption of bio-fortified cassava in Nigeria. The study was conducted in three states in Nigeria where bio-fortified cassava technology was first released in Nigeria including Oyo, Benue and Akwa Ibom. Multistage sampling techniques were used to select 360 bio-fortified cassava farmers. Descriptive statistics, t-test and Cragg’s double hurdle model were used to analyse the data collected. The land tenure system practised in the bio-fortified cassava-producing areas in Nigeria is governed by inheritance (23%), purchasing (19.7), gifting (31.7) and temporary arrangements through rentals (25.6%). The tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers pay about ₦31,000 per acre per year in land for cash agreement or 4%–7% of the actual yield of the bio-fortified cassava in land for cassava outputs agreements. However, this agreement between the landlords and tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers is verbal where both parties try as much as possible to honour the agreements. Variables such as access to credit, landownership status, access to bio-fortified cassava stems and extension contacts influenced the decision to adopt bio-fortified cassava technology, while age, perception and training influenced the intensity of adoption of bio-fortified cassava technology. The result of the t-test analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the farm sizes (34739.467 at 1%) and yields (0.593 at 1%) of the landlords and tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers. The findings of the study indicated that tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers were being faced with the problem of insecure land access, thus the need to implement policies that will increase access to land resources among the tenant farmers in Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":118277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Land and Rural Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Land Tenure, Land Property Rights and Adoption of Bio-fortified Cassava in Nigeria: Policy Implications\",\"authors\":\"Kolapo Adetomiwa, Abimbola Esther Iseoluwa, Omilaju Samuel Babatunde\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23210249211001988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated land tenure, land right and rental system, as it relates to adoption of bio-fortified cassava in Nigeria. The study was conducted in three states in Nigeria where bio-fortified cassava technology was first released in Nigeria including Oyo, Benue and Akwa Ibom. Multistage sampling techniques were used to select 360 bio-fortified cassava farmers. Descriptive statistics, t-test and Cragg’s double hurdle model were used to analyse the data collected. The land tenure system practised in the bio-fortified cassava-producing areas in Nigeria is governed by inheritance (23%), purchasing (19.7), gifting (31.7) and temporary arrangements through rentals (25.6%). The tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers pay about ₦31,000 per acre per year in land for cash agreement or 4%–7% of the actual yield of the bio-fortified cassava in land for cassava outputs agreements. However, this agreement between the landlords and tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers is verbal where both parties try as much as possible to honour the agreements. Variables such as access to credit, landownership status, access to bio-fortified cassava stems and extension contacts influenced the decision to adopt bio-fortified cassava technology, while age, perception and training influenced the intensity of adoption of bio-fortified cassava technology. The result of the t-test analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the farm sizes (34739.467 at 1%) and yields (0.593 at 1%) of the landlords and tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers. The findings of the study indicated that tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers were being faced with the problem of insecure land access, thus the need to implement policies that will increase access to land resources among the tenant farmers in Nigeria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Land and Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Land and Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249211001988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Land and Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249211001988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究调查了与尼日利亚采用生物强化木薯有关的土地权属、土地权利和租赁制度。这项研究是在尼日利亚的三个州进行的,其中包括Oyo、Benue和Akwa Ibom,生物强化木薯技术首次在尼日利亚发布。采用多阶段抽样技术选取360名生物强化木薯农户。采用描述性统计、t检验和Cragg双栏模型对收集到的数据进行分析。尼日利亚生物强化木薯产区实行的土地权属制度包括继承(23%)、购买(19.7%)、赠与(31.7%)和通过租赁进行的临时安排(25.6%)。使用生物强化木薯的农民每年为每英亩土地支付约3.1万奈拉的现金协议,或为木薯产量协议支付生物强化木薯实际产量的4%-7%。然而,房东和生物强化木薯佃农之间的协议是口头的,双方都尽可能地遵守协议。获得信贷、土地所有权状况、获得生物强化木薯茎和推广联系等变量影响采用生物强化木薯技术的决定,而年龄、认知和培训影响采用生物强化木薯技术的强度。t检验分析结果显示,房东和佃农在种植规模(34739.467,1%)和产量(0.593,1%)上存在显著差异。研究结果表明,种植生物强化木薯的佃农正面临着土地获取不安全的问题,因此有必要实施政策,增加尼日利亚佃农获得土地资源的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Land Tenure, Land Property Rights and Adoption of Bio-fortified Cassava in Nigeria: Policy Implications
This study investigated land tenure, land right and rental system, as it relates to adoption of bio-fortified cassava in Nigeria. The study was conducted in three states in Nigeria where bio-fortified cassava technology was first released in Nigeria including Oyo, Benue and Akwa Ibom. Multistage sampling techniques were used to select 360 bio-fortified cassava farmers. Descriptive statistics, t-test and Cragg’s double hurdle model were used to analyse the data collected. The land tenure system practised in the bio-fortified cassava-producing areas in Nigeria is governed by inheritance (23%), purchasing (19.7), gifting (31.7) and temporary arrangements through rentals (25.6%). The tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers pay about ₦31,000 per acre per year in land for cash agreement or 4%–7% of the actual yield of the bio-fortified cassava in land for cassava outputs agreements. However, this agreement between the landlords and tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers is verbal where both parties try as much as possible to honour the agreements. Variables such as access to credit, landownership status, access to bio-fortified cassava stems and extension contacts influenced the decision to adopt bio-fortified cassava technology, while age, perception and training influenced the intensity of adoption of bio-fortified cassava technology. The result of the t-test analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the farm sizes (34739.467 at 1%) and yields (0.593 at 1%) of the landlords and tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers. The findings of the study indicated that tenant bio-fortified cassava farmers were being faced with the problem of insecure land access, thus the need to implement policies that will increase access to land resources among the tenant farmers in Nigeria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信