自传与语言写作的政治与美学

T. Pióro
{"title":"自传与语言写作的政治与美学","authors":"T. Pióro","doi":"10.7311/pjas.11/2/2017.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article begins with a description of The Grand Piano: An Experiment in Collective Autobiography, which was written by ten Language poets from San Francisco, focusing on the paradoxes implied by “collective autobiography.” It then proceeds to close readings of three contributions to this work, by Carla Harryman and Lyn Hejinian, examining the relations between poetics, politics, gender and ideology their texts bring to the fore. Harryman anecdotally describes her critical stance towards the Romantic lyric and its enduring influence on some avant-garde American poets (Robert Creeley is the victim in question), while Hejinian, combining personal reminiscences of political protest with attempts at situating it within a tradition of critical thought, from Adorno through Said to Debord, makes a case for the relevance of Language writing to a future remaking of the polis. The article is, in the main, descriptive, not critical or polemical; the only doubt I voice in it concerns the difficulty involved in reading Language poems and the uncertain status of pleasure such difficulty implies, for surely it is for the sake of future pleasures we would like to have the polis reinvented, or at least improved?","PeriodicalId":384144,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal for American Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autobiography and the Politics and Aesthetics of Language Writing\",\"authors\":\"T. Pióro\",\"doi\":\"10.7311/pjas.11/2/2017.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article begins with a description of The Grand Piano: An Experiment in Collective Autobiography, which was written by ten Language poets from San Francisco, focusing on the paradoxes implied by “collective autobiography.” It then proceeds to close readings of three contributions to this work, by Carla Harryman and Lyn Hejinian, examining the relations between poetics, politics, gender and ideology their texts bring to the fore. Harryman anecdotally describes her critical stance towards the Romantic lyric and its enduring influence on some avant-garde American poets (Robert Creeley is the victim in question), while Hejinian, combining personal reminiscences of political protest with attempts at situating it within a tradition of critical thought, from Adorno through Said to Debord, makes a case for the relevance of Language writing to a future remaking of the polis. The article is, in the main, descriptive, not critical or polemical; the only doubt I voice in it concerns the difficulty involved in reading Language poems and the uncertain status of pleasure such difficulty implies, for surely it is for the sake of future pleasures we would like to have the polis reinvented, or at least improved?\",\"PeriodicalId\":384144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal for American Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal for American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7311/pjas.11/2/2017.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal for American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7311/pjas.11/2/2017.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文首先对十位来自旧金山的语言诗人创作的《大钢琴:集体自传的实验》进行了描述,重点探讨了“集体自传”所隐含的悖论。接下来,我们将仔细阅读卡拉·哈里曼(Carla Harryman)和林恩·海吉尼安(Lyn Hejinian)对这部作品的三篇贡献,考察他们的文本所带来的诗学、政治、性别和意识形态之间的关系。哈里曼以轶事的方式描述了她对浪漫主义抒情诗的批判立场,以及它对一些美国前卫诗人的持久影响(罗伯特·克里利是问题中的受害者),而赫吉尼安则将个人对政治抗议的回忆与试图将其置于批判思想传统中的尝试结合起来,从阿多诺到赛义德再到德波,提出了语言写作与未来重建城市的相关性。这篇文章主要是描述性的,而不是批评性的或论战性的;我在书中表达的唯一疑问是关于阅读语言诗歌的困难,以及这种困难所暗示的不确定的快乐状态,因为为了未来的快乐,我们当然希望城邦被重新发明,或者至少得到改善?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autobiography and the Politics and Aesthetics of Language Writing
The article begins with a description of The Grand Piano: An Experiment in Collective Autobiography, which was written by ten Language poets from San Francisco, focusing on the paradoxes implied by “collective autobiography.” It then proceeds to close readings of three contributions to this work, by Carla Harryman and Lyn Hejinian, examining the relations between poetics, politics, gender and ideology their texts bring to the fore. Harryman anecdotally describes her critical stance towards the Romantic lyric and its enduring influence on some avant-garde American poets (Robert Creeley is the victim in question), while Hejinian, combining personal reminiscences of political protest with attempts at situating it within a tradition of critical thought, from Adorno through Said to Debord, makes a case for the relevance of Language writing to a future remaking of the polis. The article is, in the main, descriptive, not critical or polemical; the only doubt I voice in it concerns the difficulty involved in reading Language poems and the uncertain status of pleasure such difficulty implies, for surely it is for the sake of future pleasures we would like to have the polis reinvented, or at least improved?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信