{"title":"光导Autritte .《评论》","authors":"C. Macleod","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2023.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"borne debris in Jeremias Gotthelf’s Die Wassernot in Emmental (1838) before considering the efforts to resist the erosion of landscape and memory in max Frisch’s Der Mensch erscheint im Holozän (1927). Finally, Part 3 (“Triviality”) looks at spaces that contain junk in Gottfried Keller’s Der grüne Heinrich (1854–55) and surfaces that collect dust and sand in two crime novels by Friedrich Glauser from 1936. Frederick’s deeply researched case studies proceed from careful textual analyses anchored in historical and philosophical contextualization. For example, the chapter on stifter offers a sophisticated reading of a lesser-known text by way of a deep dive into cryptogamic reproduction and classification. considering that collecting was practiced passionately throughout nineteenth-century Europe, it is unclear from Frederick’s study the extent to which his argument is specific to German-speaking culture. Unlike other scholarly forays into literary collecting, Frederick’s sources do not thematize collecting or utilize it as a structural principle. accordingly, his choice of texts, much like the objects they feature, are unexpected and unconventional. The chapter on Frisch, for instance, reveals how efforts to prevent deterioration involve the creation of waste itself when the protagonist’s struggle with dementia results in gathering and displaying information on unwieldy amounts of paper scraps. Thus, The Redemption of Things serves as a logical complement to Frederick’s previous monograph, Narratives Unsettled, which examines digressions and interruptions, elements normally dismissed as types of linguistic detritus. Frederick’s aptitude for discovering relevance in the irrelevant makes for a fascinating read. Even less-persuasive chapters are still richly informative and provoke readers to examine the oft-overlooked pieces and particulates of the world around them with new eyes and newfound curiosity. in the end, the author delivers what his title promises: a model for nonrestorative collecting which acknowledges collection as dispersal and underscores the continuities between realism and modernism. Through amassing such necessarily incomplete or insignificant things, the collector recognizes the precariousness of material culture as essential to modern existence. in accepting an object’s inevitable decay into immateriality, we come to accept the materiality, contingency, and irrevocable decline of our own bodies. only through loss can redemption occur. The redemption of things, as Frederick reminds us, “does not save us from the world of scattered things by ‘fixing’ or ‘restoring’ them; it allows for these things to be experienced fully.” collecting is no longer a mechanism for overcoming alienation and impermanence, but a means of coming to terms with them as conditions of modernity. Those appreciative of austrian and swiss literature along with scholars interested in material culture, collecting, and nonfunctional or “marginal” objects will likely be most attracted to Frederick’s book. Yet his work reaches beyond this primary readership in its attention to multiple disciplines and affirmative turn to literature in contributing to and shaping cultural discourses of past and present.","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optische Autritte. Marktszenen in der medialen Konkurrenz von Journal-, Almanachs- und Bücherliteratur by Stephanie Gleißner et al. (review)\",\"authors\":\"C. Macleod\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/gyr.2023.0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"borne debris in Jeremias Gotthelf’s Die Wassernot in Emmental (1838) before considering the efforts to resist the erosion of landscape and memory in max Frisch’s Der Mensch erscheint im Holozän (1927). Finally, Part 3 (“Triviality”) looks at spaces that contain junk in Gottfried Keller’s Der grüne Heinrich (1854–55) and surfaces that collect dust and sand in two crime novels by Friedrich Glauser from 1936. Frederick’s deeply researched case studies proceed from careful textual analyses anchored in historical and philosophical contextualization. For example, the chapter on stifter offers a sophisticated reading of a lesser-known text by way of a deep dive into cryptogamic reproduction and classification. considering that collecting was practiced passionately throughout nineteenth-century Europe, it is unclear from Frederick’s study the extent to which his argument is specific to German-speaking culture. Unlike other scholarly forays into literary collecting, Frederick’s sources do not thematize collecting or utilize it as a structural principle. accordingly, his choice of texts, much like the objects they feature, are unexpected and unconventional. The chapter on Frisch, for instance, reveals how efforts to prevent deterioration involve the creation of waste itself when the protagonist’s struggle with dementia results in gathering and displaying information on unwieldy amounts of paper scraps. Thus, The Redemption of Things serves as a logical complement to Frederick’s previous monograph, Narratives Unsettled, which examines digressions and interruptions, elements normally dismissed as types of linguistic detritus. Frederick’s aptitude for discovering relevance in the irrelevant makes for a fascinating read. Even less-persuasive chapters are still richly informative and provoke readers to examine the oft-overlooked pieces and particulates of the world around them with new eyes and newfound curiosity. in the end, the author delivers what his title promises: a model for nonrestorative collecting which acknowledges collection as dispersal and underscores the continuities between realism and modernism. Through amassing such necessarily incomplete or insignificant things, the collector recognizes the precariousness of material culture as essential to modern existence. in accepting an object’s inevitable decay into immateriality, we come to accept the materiality, contingency, and irrevocable decline of our own bodies. only through loss can redemption occur. The redemption of things, as Frederick reminds us, “does not save us from the world of scattered things by ‘fixing’ or ‘restoring’ them; it allows for these things to be experienced fully.” collecting is no longer a mechanism for overcoming alienation and impermanence, but a means of coming to terms with them as conditions of modernity. Those appreciative of austrian and swiss literature along with scholars interested in material culture, collecting, and nonfunctional or “marginal” objects will likely be most attracted to Frederick’s book. Yet his work reaches beyond this primary readership in its attention to multiple disciplines and affirmative turn to literature in contributing to and shaping cultural discourses of past and present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2023.0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Goethe Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2023.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在杰里米亚斯·戈特尔夫的《爱门塔尔的战争》(1838年)中,他先考虑了在马克斯·弗里施的《人的生活》Holozän(1927年)中抵抗景观和记忆侵蚀的努力。最后,第三部分(“琐碎”)将探讨戈特弗里德·凯勒(Gottfried Keller)的《Der gr ne Heinrich》(1854-55)中包含垃圾的空间,以及弗里德里希·格劳瑟(Friedrich Glauser) 1936年的两部犯罪小说中收集灰尘和沙子的表面。弗雷德里克的深入研究的案例研究,从仔细的文本分析锚定在历史和哲学语境。例如,关于stifter的章节提供了一个鲜为人知的文本的复杂阅读,通过深入研究密码复制和分类。考虑到整个19世纪的欧洲都热衷于收藏,从弗雷德里克的研究中我们不清楚他的论点在多大程度上是针对德语文化的。与其他对文学收藏的学术尝试不同,弗雷德里克的资料来源没有将收藏主题化,也没有将其作为一种结构原则。因此,他对文本的选择,就像它们所呈现的对象一样,是出乎意料和非常规的。例如,关于弗里施的那一章揭示了,当主人公与痴呆症作斗争时,他不得不在大量的废纸上收集和显示信息,防止信息变质的努力本身就会产生浪费。因此,《事物的救赎》是对弗雷德里克之前的专著《未解决的叙述》的逻辑补充,后者研究了离题和中断,这些元素通常被视为语言碎片的类型。腓特烈在不相关的事物中发现关联的天赋使他的作品引人入胜。即使是不那么有说服力的章节,也能提供丰富的信息,激发读者用新的眼光和新发现的好奇心来审视他们周围世界中经常被忽视的片段和细节。最后,作者提供了他的标题所承诺的:一个非恢复性收藏的模型,它承认收藏是分散的,并强调现实主义和现代主义之间的连续性。通过收集这些必然不完整或无关紧要的东西,收藏家认识到物质文化的不稳定性对现代生活至关重要。在接受一个物体不可避免地腐朽为非物质性时,我们开始接受我们自己身体的物质性、偶然性和不可逆转的衰落。只有经历损失,才能获得救赎。正如腓特烈提醒我们的那样,事物的救赎“并不是通过‘修复’或‘恢复’事物来把我们从纷乱的世界中拯救出来;它允许这些事情被充分体验。“收集不再是一种克服异化和无常的机制,而是一种作为现代性条件与它们达成协议的手段。那些欣赏奥地利和瑞士文学的人,以及对物质文化、收藏和非功能性或“边缘”物品感兴趣的学者,最有可能被弗雷德里克的书所吸引。然而,他的作品超越了这一主要读者群体,因为它关注多学科,并积极转向文学,为过去和现在的文化话语做出贡献和塑造。
Optische Autritte. Marktszenen in der medialen Konkurrenz von Journal-, Almanachs- und Bücherliteratur by Stephanie Gleißner et al. (review)
borne debris in Jeremias Gotthelf’s Die Wassernot in Emmental (1838) before considering the efforts to resist the erosion of landscape and memory in max Frisch’s Der Mensch erscheint im Holozän (1927). Finally, Part 3 (“Triviality”) looks at spaces that contain junk in Gottfried Keller’s Der grüne Heinrich (1854–55) and surfaces that collect dust and sand in two crime novels by Friedrich Glauser from 1936. Frederick’s deeply researched case studies proceed from careful textual analyses anchored in historical and philosophical contextualization. For example, the chapter on stifter offers a sophisticated reading of a lesser-known text by way of a deep dive into cryptogamic reproduction and classification. considering that collecting was practiced passionately throughout nineteenth-century Europe, it is unclear from Frederick’s study the extent to which his argument is specific to German-speaking culture. Unlike other scholarly forays into literary collecting, Frederick’s sources do not thematize collecting or utilize it as a structural principle. accordingly, his choice of texts, much like the objects they feature, are unexpected and unconventional. The chapter on Frisch, for instance, reveals how efforts to prevent deterioration involve the creation of waste itself when the protagonist’s struggle with dementia results in gathering and displaying information on unwieldy amounts of paper scraps. Thus, The Redemption of Things serves as a logical complement to Frederick’s previous monograph, Narratives Unsettled, which examines digressions and interruptions, elements normally dismissed as types of linguistic detritus. Frederick’s aptitude for discovering relevance in the irrelevant makes for a fascinating read. Even less-persuasive chapters are still richly informative and provoke readers to examine the oft-overlooked pieces and particulates of the world around them with new eyes and newfound curiosity. in the end, the author delivers what his title promises: a model for nonrestorative collecting which acknowledges collection as dispersal and underscores the continuities between realism and modernism. Through amassing such necessarily incomplete or insignificant things, the collector recognizes the precariousness of material culture as essential to modern existence. in accepting an object’s inevitable decay into immateriality, we come to accept the materiality, contingency, and irrevocable decline of our own bodies. only through loss can redemption occur. The redemption of things, as Frederick reminds us, “does not save us from the world of scattered things by ‘fixing’ or ‘restoring’ them; it allows for these things to be experienced fully.” collecting is no longer a mechanism for overcoming alienation and impermanence, but a means of coming to terms with them as conditions of modernity. Those appreciative of austrian and swiss literature along with scholars interested in material culture, collecting, and nonfunctional or “marginal” objects will likely be most attracted to Frederick’s book. Yet his work reaches beyond this primary readership in its attention to multiple disciplines and affirmative turn to literature in contributing to and shaping cultural discourses of past and present.