{"title":"LPC声码器在TMS320C30 EVM上的SPOX和C实现比较","authors":"D. Kilpatrick, T. Jannett","doi":"10.1109/SECON.1995.513095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper describes a comparison of a C implementation of a linear predictive voice coder (LPC) and an implementation based on Spectron Microsystem's Signal Processing Operating System (SPOX). The hardware platform was a Texas Instruments TMS320C30 Evaluation Module. The SPOX and C implementations were compared based on execution time, ease of program development and maintenance, and portability to different hardware platforms. The vocoder algorithms and the results of the comparison of both implementations are presented.","PeriodicalId":334874,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '95. Visualize the Future","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of SPOX and C implementations of a LPC vocoder on the TMS320C30 EVM\",\"authors\":\"D. Kilpatrick, T. Jannett\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SECON.1995.513095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper describes a comparison of a C implementation of a linear predictive voice coder (LPC) and an implementation based on Spectron Microsystem's Signal Processing Operating System (SPOX). The hardware platform was a Texas Instruments TMS320C30 Evaluation Module. The SPOX and C implementations were compared based on execution time, ease of program development and maintenance, and portability to different hardware platforms. The vocoder algorithms and the results of the comparison of both implementations are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '95. Visualize the Future\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '95. Visualize the Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.1995.513095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '95. Visualize the Future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.1995.513095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison of SPOX and C implementations of a LPC vocoder on the TMS320C30 EVM
The paper describes a comparison of a C implementation of a linear predictive voice coder (LPC) and an implementation based on Spectron Microsystem's Signal Processing Operating System (SPOX). The hardware platform was a Texas Instruments TMS320C30 Evaluation Module. The SPOX and C implementations were compared based on execution time, ease of program development and maintenance, and portability to different hardware platforms. The vocoder algorithms and the results of the comparison of both implementations are presented.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
