供应商什么时候表现得机会主义?金融市场对企业IT外包关系影响的实证研究

R. Kishore, Akie Iriyama, Laxmi Gunupudi
{"title":"供应商什么时候表现得机会主义?金融市场对企业IT外包关系影响的实证研究","authors":"R. Kishore, Akie Iriyama, Laxmi Gunupudi","doi":"10.1145/3084381.3084387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firms experience knowledge spillovers when working with outsourcing partners. This problem may be more severe when a firm and its rivals enter into outsourcing relationships with the same vendor. In such a network of outsourcing relationships, the common vendor may become the conduit for knowledge leakage from one firm to the other due to its own opportunistic calculus. Rooted in transaction cost economics (TCE), we propose that a vendor will utilize the knowledge gained from focal or rival firms whenever it is in the interest of the vendor to do so, resulting in losses or gains to rivals of a focal firm when the focal firm announces a new contract with the common vendor. Using a sample of 510 IT outsourcing contract announcements, we observed such losses and gains through cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) that accrue to rival firms around the date of announcement of a new IT outsourcing contract by a focal firm. Results support our hypotheses and show negative CARs for rivals that in the past had a relationship with the focal vendor but do not have a current relationship with the vendor. We also find that the rival firm size relative to the focal firm size plays an important role in vendor calculus and resulting knowledge spillovers. Knowledge leaks from a rival to a focal firm, and the rival experiences a negative CAR, when the rival is relatively larger in size compared to the focal firm and is no longer in a relationship with the vendor. However, in contrast, when the rival is relatively larger in size compared to the focal firm and is currently in a relationship with the vendor, knowledge leaks from the focal firm to the rival who experiences a positive CAR.","PeriodicalId":441637,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research","volume":"139 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Do Vendors Behave Opportunistically?: An Empirical Study of Financial Market Impacts on Firms in IT Outsourcing Relationships\",\"authors\":\"R. Kishore, Akie Iriyama, Laxmi Gunupudi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3084381.3084387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Firms experience knowledge spillovers when working with outsourcing partners. This problem may be more severe when a firm and its rivals enter into outsourcing relationships with the same vendor. In such a network of outsourcing relationships, the common vendor may become the conduit for knowledge leakage from one firm to the other due to its own opportunistic calculus. Rooted in transaction cost economics (TCE), we propose that a vendor will utilize the knowledge gained from focal or rival firms whenever it is in the interest of the vendor to do so, resulting in losses or gains to rivals of a focal firm when the focal firm announces a new contract with the common vendor. Using a sample of 510 IT outsourcing contract announcements, we observed such losses and gains through cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) that accrue to rival firms around the date of announcement of a new IT outsourcing contract by a focal firm. Results support our hypotheses and show negative CARs for rivals that in the past had a relationship with the focal vendor but do not have a current relationship with the vendor. We also find that the rival firm size relative to the focal firm size plays an important role in vendor calculus and resulting knowledge spillovers. Knowledge leaks from a rival to a focal firm, and the rival experiences a negative CAR, when the rival is relatively larger in size compared to the focal firm and is no longer in a relationship with the vendor. However, in contrast, when the rival is relatively larger in size compared to the focal firm and is currently in a relationship with the vendor, knowledge leaks from the focal firm to the rival who experiences a positive CAR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research\",\"volume\":\"139 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3084381.3084387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3084381.3084387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业在与外包伙伴合作时会经历知识溢出。当一家公司及其竞争对手与同一家供应商建立外包关系时,这个问题可能会更加严重。在这样一个外包关系的网络中,共同的供应商可能会成为知识从一个公司泄漏到另一个公司的渠道,因为它自己的机会主义计算。基于交易成本经济学(TCE),我们提出,只要符合供应商的利益,供应商就会利用从焦点公司或竞争对手那里获得的知识,当焦点公司宣布与共同供应商签订新合同时,焦点公司的竞争对手就会损失或获利。使用510个IT外包合同公告的样本,我们通过累积异常回报(car)观察到这种损失和收益,这些异常回报是在核心公司宣布新的IT外包合同的日期前后累积到竞争对手公司的。结果支持我们的假设,并显示过去与重点供应商有关系但目前与供应商没有关系的竞争对手的负面car。我们还发现,竞争对手的企业规模相对于焦点企业的规模在供应商演算和由此产生的知识溢出中起着重要作用。当竞争对手的规模相对于核心企业更大,并且不再与供应商保持关系时,竞争对手的知识泄漏到核心企业,并且竞争对手经历负CAR。然而,相比之下,当竞争对手的规模比焦点公司大,并且目前与供应商有关系时,知识就会从焦点公司泄露给经历积极CAR的竞争对手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Do Vendors Behave Opportunistically?: An Empirical Study of Financial Market Impacts on Firms in IT Outsourcing Relationships
Firms experience knowledge spillovers when working with outsourcing partners. This problem may be more severe when a firm and its rivals enter into outsourcing relationships with the same vendor. In such a network of outsourcing relationships, the common vendor may become the conduit for knowledge leakage from one firm to the other due to its own opportunistic calculus. Rooted in transaction cost economics (TCE), we propose that a vendor will utilize the knowledge gained from focal or rival firms whenever it is in the interest of the vendor to do so, resulting in losses or gains to rivals of a focal firm when the focal firm announces a new contract with the common vendor. Using a sample of 510 IT outsourcing contract announcements, we observed such losses and gains through cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) that accrue to rival firms around the date of announcement of a new IT outsourcing contract by a focal firm. Results support our hypotheses and show negative CARs for rivals that in the past had a relationship with the focal vendor but do not have a current relationship with the vendor. We also find that the rival firm size relative to the focal firm size plays an important role in vendor calculus and resulting knowledge spillovers. Knowledge leaks from a rival to a focal firm, and the rival experiences a negative CAR, when the rival is relatively larger in size compared to the focal firm and is no longer in a relationship with the vendor. However, in contrast, when the rival is relatively larger in size compared to the focal firm and is currently in a relationship with the vendor, knowledge leaks from the focal firm to the rival who experiences a positive CAR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信