你的选票有多少?印尼地方选举拨款支出的机会主义商业周期

ERN: National Pub Date : 2019-10-03 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3303074
Tengku Munawar Chalil
{"title":"你的选票有多少?印尼地方选举拨款支出的机会主义商业周期","authors":"Tengku Munawar Chalil","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3303074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The opportunistic political cycle’s theories argued that the incumbent raises the visible expenses in the election time. The paper presents an alternative case that the public planning cycle impedes the incumbent to hike these expenditures. As a short-cut, the incumbent prefers to increase the grants to the voters, which can be comprehended as the vote-buying action. The paper tests the argument by using Indonesia local election and grants spending data from 2008 to 2013. Through treating the endogeneity of incumbency, the analysis results suggest that when the incumbent is participating in the election, the increase in these expenses are observed. Moreover, the hike of grant expenditures is mediated if the incumbent is in a loose electoral contest, where the political concentration is high. In the opposite, the grant expenditures increase to a greater extent if the incumbent participates in a tight election.","PeriodicalId":221919,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Much Is Your Vote? Opportunistic Business Cycles of Grant Expenditures in Indonesia’s Local Election\",\"authors\":\"Tengku Munawar Chalil\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3303074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The opportunistic political cycle’s theories argued that the incumbent raises the visible expenses in the election time. The paper presents an alternative case that the public planning cycle impedes the incumbent to hike these expenditures. As a short-cut, the incumbent prefers to increase the grants to the voters, which can be comprehended as the vote-buying action. The paper tests the argument by using Indonesia local election and grants spending data from 2008 to 2013. Through treating the endogeneity of incumbency, the analysis results suggest that when the incumbent is participating in the election, the increase in these expenses are observed. Moreover, the hike of grant expenditures is mediated if the incumbent is in a loose electoral contest, where the political concentration is high. In the opposite, the grant expenditures increase to a greater extent if the incumbent participates in a tight election.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: National\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: National\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3303074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3303074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机会主义政治周期理论认为,现任者在选举期间增加了看得见的开支。本文提出了另一种情况,即公共规划周期阻碍了现任者增加这些支出。作为一种捷径,现任者倾向于增加对选民的补助,这可以理解为贿选行为。本文通过使用印度尼西亚2008年至2013年的地方选举和拨款支出数据来验证这一论点。通过对任期内生性的处理,分析结果表明,当在职者参与选举时,这些费用会增加。此外,如果现任总统处于政治集中度高的松散选举中,则可以调节补助金支出的增加。相反,如果在职人员参加激烈的选举,则补助金支出增加的幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Much Is Your Vote? Opportunistic Business Cycles of Grant Expenditures in Indonesia’s Local Election
The opportunistic political cycle’s theories argued that the incumbent raises the visible expenses in the election time. The paper presents an alternative case that the public planning cycle impedes the incumbent to hike these expenditures. As a short-cut, the incumbent prefers to increase the grants to the voters, which can be comprehended as the vote-buying action. The paper tests the argument by using Indonesia local election and grants spending data from 2008 to 2013. Through treating the endogeneity of incumbency, the analysis results suggest that when the incumbent is participating in the election, the increase in these expenses are observed. Moreover, the hike of grant expenditures is mediated if the incumbent is in a loose electoral contest, where the political concentration is high. In the opposite, the grant expenditures increase to a greater extent if the incumbent participates in a tight election.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信