巴西间质性肺疾病多中心登记

M. R. Soares, C. Pereira, A. Botelho, A. Gimenez, Bruno Beraldo, C. Ferraz, E. Mancuzo, F. Machado, F. Toledo, G. Miranda, Maria Auxiliadora Carmo Moreira, M. Taube, M.D.C. Castro, M. Cerezoli, R. Boaventura, Regina Tibana, Tarciane Aline Prata, E. Coletta, R. Ferreira
{"title":"巴西间质性肺疾病多中心登记","authors":"M. R. Soares, C. Pereira, A. Botelho, A. Gimenez, Bruno Beraldo, C. Ferraz, E. Mancuzo, F. Machado, F. Toledo, G. Miranda, Maria Auxiliadora Carmo Moreira, M. Taube, M.D.C. Castro, M. Cerezoli, R. Boaventura, Regina Tibana, Tarciane Aline Prata, E. Coletta, R. Ferreira","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relative frequency of different ILD varies in different countries; in Brazil is unknown. The aim of present study was to describe the frequency of ILD in Brazil. Methods: Patients from 5 centers evaluated during 2014-2017 were included. All patients were evaluated by pulmonologists, radiologists and pathologists involved with ILD. IPF was characterized according ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT 2011 guideline. HP was characterized as definitive, probable and possible. Diagnosis of CTD, including IPAF, followed standard criteria. Familial interstitial pneumonia was the final diagnosis when ILD in first degree relatives was reported. Results: A total of 1,015 patients with ILD were enrolled. Mean age was 61 ± 15 yrs.; 53% were female. FVC was 69.2 ± 19.7% of predicted. Drugs with potential to cause ILD were reported by 12%, GERD symptoms by 42%, occupational exposure by 13% and to possible etiologies for HP by 53%. Autoantibodies were detected in significant levels in 31% (ANA 10.5%). Biopsies contributory to diagnosis were obtained by bronchoscopy in in 97 (9.6%), by surgical lung biopsy in 162 (16.0%) and from diverse sites in 42 (4.1%). Final diagnoses are shown in Figure. Conclusions: CTD-ILD are the most common cause for ILD in Brazil (21.7%), followed by HP (19%). IPF was diagnosed in 10% of cases, familial interstitial pneumonia in 8%, sarcoidosis in 7%. In 9% of diagnosis was undefined.","PeriodicalId":178396,"journal":{"name":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Registry of Interstitial Lung Diseases in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Soares, C. Pereira, A. Botelho, A. Gimenez, Bruno Beraldo, C. Ferraz, E. Mancuzo, F. Machado, F. Toledo, G. Miranda, Maria Auxiliadora Carmo Moreira, M. Taube, M.D.C. Castro, M. Cerezoli, R. Boaventura, Regina Tibana, Tarciane Aline Prata, E. Coletta, R. Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relative frequency of different ILD varies in different countries; in Brazil is unknown. The aim of present study was to describe the frequency of ILD in Brazil. Methods: Patients from 5 centers evaluated during 2014-2017 were included. All patients were evaluated by pulmonologists, radiologists and pathologists involved with ILD. IPF was characterized according ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT 2011 guideline. HP was characterized as definitive, probable and possible. Diagnosis of CTD, including IPAF, followed standard criteria. Familial interstitial pneumonia was the final diagnosis when ILD in first degree relatives was reported. Results: A total of 1,015 patients with ILD were enrolled. Mean age was 61 ± 15 yrs.; 53% were female. FVC was 69.2 ± 19.7% of predicted. Drugs with potential to cause ILD were reported by 12%, GERD symptoms by 42%, occupational exposure by 13% and to possible etiologies for HP by 53%. Autoantibodies were detected in significant levels in 31% (ANA 10.5%). Biopsies contributory to diagnosis were obtained by bronchoscopy in in 97 (9.6%), by surgical lung biopsy in 162 (16.0%) and from diverse sites in 42 (4.1%). Final diagnoses are shown in Figure. Conclusions: CTD-ILD are the most common cause for ILD in Brazil (21.7%), followed by HP (19%). IPF was diagnosed in 10% of cases, familial interstitial pneumonia in 8%, sarcoidosis in 7%. In 9% of diagnosis was undefined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ILD/DPLD of known origin\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ILD/DPLD of known origin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

不同ILD的相对频率在不同国家有所不同;在巴西是未知的。本研究的目的是描述巴西ILD的发生率。方法:纳入2014-2017年5个中心评估的患者。所有患者均由肺病专家、放射科医生和与ILD相关的病理学家进行评估。根据ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT 2011指南对IPF进行表征。HP被定性为确定的、可能的和可能的。CTD的诊断,包括IPAF,符合标准标准。家族性间质性肺炎是一级亲属间质性ILD的最终诊断。结果:共纳入1015例ILD患者。平均年龄61±15岁;53%为女性。FVC为预测值的69.2±19.7%。有可能导致ILD的药物占12%,有GERD症状的占42%,有职业暴露的占13%,有可能导致HP病因的占53%。31%的患者检测到显著水平的自身抗体(ANA 10.5%)。通过支气管镜活检有助于诊断的有97例(9.6%),通过外科肺活检的有162例(16.0%),不同部位活检的有42例(4.1%)。最终诊断结果如图所示。结论:CTD-ILD是巴西最常见的ILD原因(21.7%),其次是HP(19%)。10%的病例被诊断为IPF, 8%的病例被诊断为家族间质性肺炎,7%的病例被诊断为结节病。9%的诊断不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter Registry of Interstitial Lung Diseases in Brazil
The relative frequency of different ILD varies in different countries; in Brazil is unknown. The aim of present study was to describe the frequency of ILD in Brazil. Methods: Patients from 5 centers evaluated during 2014-2017 were included. All patients were evaluated by pulmonologists, radiologists and pathologists involved with ILD. IPF was characterized according ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT 2011 guideline. HP was characterized as definitive, probable and possible. Diagnosis of CTD, including IPAF, followed standard criteria. Familial interstitial pneumonia was the final diagnosis when ILD in first degree relatives was reported. Results: A total of 1,015 patients with ILD were enrolled. Mean age was 61 ± 15 yrs.; 53% were female. FVC was 69.2 ± 19.7% of predicted. Drugs with potential to cause ILD were reported by 12%, GERD symptoms by 42%, occupational exposure by 13% and to possible etiologies for HP by 53%. Autoantibodies were detected in significant levels in 31% (ANA 10.5%). Biopsies contributory to diagnosis were obtained by bronchoscopy in in 97 (9.6%), by surgical lung biopsy in 162 (16.0%) and from diverse sites in 42 (4.1%). Final diagnoses are shown in Figure. Conclusions: CTD-ILD are the most common cause for ILD in Brazil (21.7%), followed by HP (19%). IPF was diagnosed in 10% of cases, familial interstitial pneumonia in 8%, sarcoidosis in 7%. In 9% of diagnosis was undefined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信