{"title":"州和地方预算削减在营利性学校出勤率和学生借款上升中的作用:公共部门和营利性部门之间的溢出效应","authors":"Sarena Goodman, Alice Henriques Volz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2662217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 2000 and 2010, U.S. public postsecondary schools experienced widespread decreases in appropriations funding. We document that every 10 percent cut in appropriations statewide increased for-profit attendance by 2 percent, owing to students who otherwise would have attended public institutions. We hypothesize that public institutions price adjusted in response to funding cuts which, together with a shift in attendance toward a higher-borrowing sector, induced greater reliance on debt financing among students. We estimate a corresponding increase in annual borrowing of 0.7 percent, driven by for-profit borrowers. Finally, we detect meaningful changes in public universities’ tuition, faculty, and competitive admissions slots.","PeriodicalId":269992,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of State and Local Budget Cuts in the Run-Up of For-Profit Attendance and Student Borrowing: Spillovers between the Public and For-Profit Sectors\",\"authors\":\"Sarena Goodman, Alice Henriques Volz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2662217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Between 2000 and 2010, U.S. public postsecondary schools experienced widespread decreases in appropriations funding. We document that every 10 percent cut in appropriations statewide increased for-profit attendance by 2 percent, owing to students who otherwise would have attended public institutions. We hypothesize that public institutions price adjusted in response to funding cuts which, together with a shift in attendance toward a higher-borrowing sector, induced greater reliance on debt financing among students. We estimate a corresponding increase in annual borrowing of 0.7 percent, driven by for-profit borrowers. Finally, we detect meaningful changes in public universities’ tuition, faculty, and competitive admissions slots.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2662217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2662217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Role of State and Local Budget Cuts in the Run-Up of For-Profit Attendance and Student Borrowing: Spillovers between the Public and For-Profit Sectors
Between 2000 and 2010, U.S. public postsecondary schools experienced widespread decreases in appropriations funding. We document that every 10 percent cut in appropriations statewide increased for-profit attendance by 2 percent, owing to students who otherwise would have attended public institutions. We hypothesize that public institutions price adjusted in response to funding cuts which, together with a shift in attendance toward a higher-borrowing sector, induced greater reliance on debt financing among students. We estimate a corresponding increase in annual borrowing of 0.7 percent, driven by for-profit borrowers. Finally, we detect meaningful changes in public universities’ tuition, faculty, and competitive admissions slots.