具有基于内容的需求工程评估经验

Sabine Teufl, Maged Khalil, Dongyue Mou, Eva Geisberger
{"title":"具有基于内容的需求工程评估经验","authors":"Sabine Teufl, Maged Khalil, Dongyue Mou, Eva Geisberger","doi":"10.1109/RE.2011.6051668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying strengths and weaknesses in requirements engineering (RE) activities and deriving corresponding improvement and rectification recommendations are the main goals of the presented content-based RE assessment approach, which relies on a well-founded RE reference model. Two representative examples from our case study pool, carried out for companies with established RE practices in different domains, demonstrate the approach, its results and benefits.","PeriodicalId":385129,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience with content-based requirements engineering assessments\",\"authors\":\"Sabine Teufl, Maged Khalil, Dongyue Mou, Eva Geisberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RE.2011.6051668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identifying strengths and weaknesses in requirements engineering (RE) activities and deriving corresponding improvement and rectification recommendations are the main goals of the presented content-based RE assessment approach, which relies on a well-founded RE reference model. Two representative examples from our case study pool, carried out for companies with established RE practices in different domains, demonstrate the approach, its results and benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2011.6051668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2011.6051668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

识别需求工程(RE)活动中的优势和劣势,并得出相应的改进和纠正建议,是所提出的基于内容的需求工程评估方法的主要目标,该方法依赖于一个建立良好的需求工程参考模型。我们的案例研究池中有两个代表性的例子,它们是针对在不同领域已建立可再生能源实践的公司进行的,展示了这种方法、结果和好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience with content-based requirements engineering assessments
Identifying strengths and weaknesses in requirements engineering (RE) activities and deriving corresponding improvement and rectification recommendations are the main goals of the presented content-based RE assessment approach, which relies on a well-founded RE reference model. Two representative examples from our case study pool, carried out for companies with established RE practices in different domains, demonstrate the approach, its results and benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信