骨科手术中手套穿孔的流行病学

K. Madhukar, K. Basha, Cheemala Vikram Reddy
{"title":"骨科手术中手套穿孔的流行病学","authors":"K. Madhukar, K. Basha, Cheemala Vikram Reddy","doi":"10.18231/2455-6777.2018.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgical glove perforation is one of cause for percutaneous transfer of disease. Among many HIV HBV & HCV are deadliest diseases. Among the other surgical specialities, orthopaedics has the highest rate of glove perforation. Hence this study was conducted to study the incidence of glove perforation & their pattern in our institute.\nMaterials and Methods: all the gloves (1444) collected from 286 operations which occurred during 3months period were tested, out of which 172 were major procedures and 114 were minor procedures. During the procedure, if any perforation was detected to naked eye examination then they were labelled as perforated. And rest the gloves were tested as per American society for testing and material standard (ASTM d5151 - 06) guidelines for any perforations. \nResults: In our prospective study, perforation occurred in 74(26%) surgeries. Total of 173(12%) gloves were perforated, 51(17.83%) from major & 23(8.04%) from minor procedures, the primary surgeon was most commonly involved (68%). Only 53(30.6%) glove perforation was detected during the procedure. Among the double glove users, inner glove perforation was seen in only 5% of cases. The most common fingers involved was left index (38%), then right index finger (28%) followed by left thumb (20%) and right thumb was (14%).the primary surgeon was most commonly involved (68%). The mean duration of the surgery in which perforation was noticed was 76+6minutes.\nConclusion: Double glove practice is better than the use of the single glove. Gloves have to be changed regularly in prolonged procedures. \n\nKeywords: Glove perforation, Orthopaedic surgeries, Double glove.","PeriodicalId":274774,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemology of glove perforation in orthopaedic surgeries\",\"authors\":\"K. Madhukar, K. Basha, Cheemala Vikram Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/2455-6777.2018.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Surgical glove perforation is one of cause for percutaneous transfer of disease. Among many HIV HBV & HCV are deadliest diseases. Among the other surgical specialities, orthopaedics has the highest rate of glove perforation. Hence this study was conducted to study the incidence of glove perforation & their pattern in our institute.\\nMaterials and Methods: all the gloves (1444) collected from 286 operations which occurred during 3months period were tested, out of which 172 were major procedures and 114 were minor procedures. During the procedure, if any perforation was detected to naked eye examination then they were labelled as perforated. And rest the gloves were tested as per American society for testing and material standard (ASTM d5151 - 06) guidelines for any perforations. \\nResults: In our prospective study, perforation occurred in 74(26%) surgeries. Total of 173(12%) gloves were perforated, 51(17.83%) from major & 23(8.04%) from minor procedures, the primary surgeon was most commonly involved (68%). Only 53(30.6%) glove perforation was detected during the procedure. Among the double glove users, inner glove perforation was seen in only 5% of cases. The most common fingers involved was left index (38%), then right index finger (28%) followed by left thumb (20%) and right thumb was (14%).the primary surgeon was most commonly involved (68%). The mean duration of the surgery in which perforation was noticed was 76+6minutes.\\nConclusion: Double glove practice is better than the use of the single glove. Gloves have to be changed regularly in prolonged procedures. \\n\\nKeywords: Glove perforation, Orthopaedic surgeries, Double glove.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/2455-6777.2018.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/2455-6777.2018.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术手套穿孔是疾病经皮转移的原因之一。在许多HIV、HBV和HCV是最致命的疾病。在其他外科专业中,矫形外科的手套穿孔率最高。因此,本研究对我院手套穿孔的发生率及其模式进行了研究。材料与方法:对近3个月286例手术采集的手套1444只进行检测,其中大手术172只,小手术114只。在手术过程中,如果肉眼检查发现任何穿孔,则将其标记为穿孔。其余的手套都按照美国测试协会和材料标准(ASTM d5151 - 06)指南进行了任何穿孔的测试。结果:在我们的前瞻性研究中,74例(26%)手术发生穿孔。共有173例(12%)手套穿孔,其中大手术51例(17.83%),小手术23例(8.04%),主要手术者最常见(68%)。手术过程中仅检测到53例(30.6%)手套穿孔。在双手套使用者中,手套内侧穿孔仅见于5%的病例。最常见的手指是左手食指(38%),其次是右手食指(28%),其次是左手拇指(20%)和右手拇指(14%)。主要外科医生最常受累(68%)。发现穿孔的平均手术时间为76+6分钟。结论:双手套练习比单手套练习效果更好。在长时间的手术过程中,手套必须定期更换。关键词:手套穿孔,骨科手术,双手套。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epidemology of glove perforation in orthopaedic surgeries
Introduction: Surgical glove perforation is one of cause for percutaneous transfer of disease. Among many HIV HBV & HCV are deadliest diseases. Among the other surgical specialities, orthopaedics has the highest rate of glove perforation. Hence this study was conducted to study the incidence of glove perforation & their pattern in our institute. Materials and Methods: all the gloves (1444) collected from 286 operations which occurred during 3months period were tested, out of which 172 were major procedures and 114 were minor procedures. During the procedure, if any perforation was detected to naked eye examination then they were labelled as perforated. And rest the gloves were tested as per American society for testing and material standard (ASTM d5151 - 06) guidelines for any perforations. Results: In our prospective study, perforation occurred in 74(26%) surgeries. Total of 173(12%) gloves were perforated, 51(17.83%) from major & 23(8.04%) from minor procedures, the primary surgeon was most commonly involved (68%). Only 53(30.6%) glove perforation was detected during the procedure. Among the double glove users, inner glove perforation was seen in only 5% of cases. The most common fingers involved was left index (38%), then right index finger (28%) followed by left thumb (20%) and right thumb was (14%).the primary surgeon was most commonly involved (68%). The mean duration of the surgery in which perforation was noticed was 76+6minutes. Conclusion: Double glove practice is better than the use of the single glove. Gloves have to be changed regularly in prolonged procedures. Keywords: Glove perforation, Orthopaedic surgeries, Double glove.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信