参数存在量化的距离约束内逼近

Carlos Grandón, A. Goldsztejn
{"title":"参数存在量化的距离约束内逼近","authors":"Carlos Grandón, A. Goldsztejn","doi":"10.1145/1141277.1141668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents and compares two methods for checking if a box is included inside the solution set of an equality constraint with existential quantification of its parameters. We focus on distance constraints, where each existentially quantified parameter has only one occurrence, because of their usefulness and their simplicity. The first method relies on a specific quantifier elimination based on geometric considerations whereas the second method relies on computations with generalized intervals (interval whose bounds are not constrained to be ordered). We show that on two dimensions problems, the two methods yield equivalent results. However, when dealing with higher dimensions, generalized intervals are more efficient.","PeriodicalId":269830,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inner approximation of distance constraints with existential quantification of parameters\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Grandón, A. Goldsztejn\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1141277.1141668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents and compares two methods for checking if a box is included inside the solution set of an equality constraint with existential quantification of its parameters. We focus on distance constraints, where each existentially quantified parameter has only one occurrence, because of their usefulness and their simplicity. The first method relies on a specific quantifier elimination based on geometric considerations whereas the second method relies on computations with generalized intervals (interval whose bounds are not constrained to be ordered). We show that on two dimensions problems, the two methods yield equivalent results. However, when dealing with higher dimensions, generalized intervals are more efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文给出并比较了用参数存在量化的等式约束解集中是否包含框的两种检验方法。我们专注于距离约束,其中每个存在量化参数只出现一次,因为它们的有用性和简单性。第一种方法依赖于基于几何考虑的特定量词消除,而第二种方法依赖于广义区间(其边界不受约束为有序的区间)的计算。我们证明了在二维问题上,这两种方法的结果是等价的。然而,当处理高维时,广义区间更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inner approximation of distance constraints with existential quantification of parameters
This paper presents and compares two methods for checking if a box is included inside the solution set of an equality constraint with existential quantification of its parameters. We focus on distance constraints, where each existentially quantified parameter has only one occurrence, because of their usefulness and their simplicity. The first method relies on a specific quantifier elimination based on geometric considerations whereas the second method relies on computations with generalized intervals (interval whose bounds are not constrained to be ordered). We show that on two dimensions problems, the two methods yield equivalent results. However, when dealing with higher dimensions, generalized intervals are more efficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信